Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Updated on: 18 May 2016, 22:17
Originally posted by sahmedmartinez on 18 May 2016, 10:19.
Last edited by Kurtosis on 18 May 2016, 22:17, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Kurtosis on 18 May 2016, 22:17, edited 1 time in total.
Added OA
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
79% (01:06) correct
21%
(01:06)
wrong
based on 270
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
ABCD is a quadrilateral with parallel sides. Is ABCD a rectangle?
(1) AC and BD bisect each other.
(2) Sum of <DAB and <BCD is less than 180 degrees.
(1) AC and BD bisect each other.
(2) Sum of <DAB and <BCD is less than 180 degrees.
18 May 2016, 14:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
sahmedmartinez
Dear sahmedmartinez,
I'm happy to respond.
I don't know the source of this question, but it seems to be expecting a slightly more formal understanding of geometry than the GMAT expects.
For example, in a formal geometry class, it would always be the case that if we named the quadrilateral ABCD, that this is the order of the vertices as we move continuously around the perimeter in one direction or another. In other words, if the top has A on the left and B on the right, and the bottom has C on the left and D on the right, then technically, by these standards, it would be illegal to call that quadrilateral ABCD---we would have to call it ABDC or something such as that. The GMAT always conforms to this rigorous standard in its own labeling, but it tends not to ask questions demanding that students understand this standard.
In this problem, we have to understand and apply this standard. In particular, we have to know that calling the quadrilateral ABCD means that A is opposite C and B is opposite D, so that AC and BD are diagonals, and that <DAB and <BCD are opposite angles.
Here's another geometry fact. There are four properties of parallelograms, which I like to call the BIG FOUR:
1) Opposite sides are parallel
2) Opposite sides are equal
3) Opposite angles are equal
4) Diagonals bisect each other
Any one of those is enough to guarantee that the shape is a parallelogram; thus, any one automatically implies the other three. I discuss this a little more in this blog article.
Now, with all that background, we can address the question.
Statement #1: AC and BD bisect each other.
If the diagonals bisect each other, then it is definitely a parallelogram and it definitely has all the other parallelogram properties. A rectangle is a special case of the parallelogram category, so ABCD could be a rectangle, but it doesn't have to be. We can give no definitive answer to the prompt question. This statement, alone and by itself, is not sufficient.
Statement #2: Sum of <DAB and <BCD is less than 180 degrees.
The sum of two opposite angles is less than 180 degrees. This is decisive. All the angles of rectangle, by definition, are right angles, 90 degree angles, so the sum of two opposite angles or any two angle in a rectangle would be equal to 180 degrees. If we can pick any two angles of the four, add them, and get anything other than 180 degrees, then the shape is most definitely not a rectangle. We can give a definitive "NO!" to the prompt question. Because we can arrive at a definitive answer, this statement is entirely sufficient all by itself.
First statement is not sufficient, but the second is. OA = (B)
Incidentally, that second statement is interesting. If the sum of opposite angles in a quadrilateral equals 180 degrees, then the quadrilateral could be rectangle, but that alone is not enough to guarantee it. It's possible for a completely irregular quadrilateral to have two opposite angles that equal 90 degrees.
Does all this make sense?
Mike
18 May 2016, 14:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thanks Mike,
So the reason I posted this question was because I came across it here:
f1gmat (dot) com / gmat-data-sufficiency-process-elimination#
The author concludes that statement 2 is not sufficient on its own, and his logic seemed flawed. I followed the same thought process as you; any sum of those two angles other than 180 is certainly no rectangle, and statement two is sufficient on its own. I've never come across an author use an example incorrectly, so I wanted to verify on this forum.
Thanks for the clarification.
So the reason I posted this question was because I came across it here:
f1gmat (dot) com / gmat-data-sufficiency-process-elimination#
The author concludes that statement 2 is not sufficient on its own, and his logic seemed flawed. I followed the same thought process as you; any sum of those two angles other than 180 is certainly no rectangle, and statement two is sufficient on its own. I've never come across an author use an example incorrectly, so I wanted to verify on this forum.
Thanks for the clarification.
