betterscore
According to a recent theory, Archean-age gold-quartz vein systems were formed more than two billion years ago from magmatic fluids that originated from molten granite-like bodies deep beneath the surface of the Earth. This theory is contrary to the widely held view that the systems were deposited from metamorphic fluids, that is, from fluids that formed during the dehydration of wet sedimentary rocks.
The recently developed theory has considerable practical importance. Most of the gold deposits discovered during the original gold rushes were exposed at the Earth's surface and were found because they had shed trails of alluvial gold that were easily traced by simple prospecting methods. Although these same methods still lead to an occasional discovery, most deposits not yet discovered have gone undetected because they are buried and have no surface expression.
The challenge in exploration is therefore to unravel the subsurface geology of an area and pinpoint the position of buried minerals. Methods widely used today include analysis of aerial images that yield a broad geological overview; geophysical techniques that provide data on the magnetic, electrical, and mineralogical properties of the rocks being investigated; and sensitive chemical tests that are able to detect the subtle chemical halos that often envelop mineralization. However, none of these high-technology methods are of any value if the sites to which they are applied have never mineralized, and to maximize the chances of discovery the explorer must therefore pay particular attention to selecting the ground formations most likely to be mineralized. Such ground selection relies to varying degrees on conceptual models, which take into account theoretical studies of relevant factors.
These models are constructed primarily from empirical observations of known mineral deposits and from theories of ore-forming processes. The explorer uses the models to identify those geological features that are critical to the formation of the mineralization being modeled, and then tries to select areas for exploration that exhibit as many of the critical features as possible.
Hi experts
AndrewN IanStewart AjiteshArun zhanboI felt a sense of community to come back as a break from my TOEFL practice, but I also once again felt the mighty power of GMAT RC questions. I am confused about the Question 7, since I do not feel interested at any of the five options even though I have checked all previous posts and the official explanations. Could you experts share some thoughts when you have time please? Thank you!
betterscore
109. The theory mentioned in lines 1-5 relates to the conceptual models discussed in the passage in which of the following ways?(A) It may furnish a valid account of ore-forming processes, and, hence, can support conceptual models that have great practical significance.
(B) It suggests that certain geological formations, long believed to be mineralized, are in fact mineralized, thus confirming current conceptual models.
(C) It suggests that there may not be enough similarity across Archean-age gold-quartz vein systems to warrant the formulation of conceptual models.
(D) It corrects existing theories about the chemical halos of gold deposits, and thus provides a basis for correcting current conceptual models.
(E) It suggests that simple prospecting methods still have a higher success rate in the discovery of gold deposits than do more modern methods.
The theory mentioned in line 1-5 is the recent theory, the core of this passage. This recent theory is also the antecedent of the pronoun "
It" appearing in all five options. On the other hand, the conceptual models show in the end of the third paragraph and the final paragraph.
Before I checked the options, my understanding for the relationship between the recent theory and the models was quite simple: the recent theory indicates that some gold is buried deep beneath Earth, and in order to pinpoint the locations of the buried gold, people need to use the models in addition to high-tech prospecting methods. So basically, these models are helpful for people who believe in the recent theory and attempt to find golds. But we could not know whether the recent theory plays a role in the development of these models, or the other way around, because it is not mentioned in the passage. These were my thinking lines.
But none of the five options presents such a straightforward relationship as mine, and the correct answer, (A), looks quite convoluted to me. I hope to analyze one option at a time, but first I hope to concentrate on the option (A):
(A) It may furnish a valid account of ore-forming processes, and, hence, can support conceptual models that have great practical significance.
From the passage we know that "It," or the recent theory, contends that Archean-age gold-quartz vein systems were formed more than two billion years ago from magmatic fluids that originated from molten granite-like bodies deep beneath the surface of the Earth. And we know that this recent view is contrary to the widely held view that the systems were deposited from metamorphic fluids. (Although the recent theory also appears in other paragraphs, its exact description rests only in the first paragraph.)
Meanwhile, from the passage we know that the conceptual models consider
theoretical studies of relevant factors, and are constructed primarily from empirical observations of known mineral deposits and from
theories of ore-forming processes. The models are used to identify geological features so people can select the ground formations most likely to be mineralized.
I thought that "
theoretical studies of relevant factors" and "
theories of ore-forming processes" refer to other studies than the recent theory mentioned in the first paragraph, because: (1) the recent theory is about "gold-quartz vein systems" and I am unsure whether ore is part of the systems; (2) in light of the sequence of the paragraphs, I am under the impression that the recent theory is the motive for people's trying to prospect for the underground world, not the tool used in the process.
The option (A) will be more acceptable to me if the recent theory is one of the theories on which the models are constructed. But, I still do not get why the recent theory can provide a valid description of ore-forming processes. Neither can I understand the following official explanations colored in green color.
Sajjad1994
Official Explanation
109. The theory mentioned in lines 1-5 relates to the conceptual models discussed in the passage in which of the following ways?
This question requires considering the conceptual models described in lines 35–41 in light of the recent theory (lines 1–5), which the author assures the reader has considerable practical importance (lines 10–11). The conceptual models are derived from observation and from theories of ore-forming processes.
Therefore, the recent theory may explain ore formation in a way that leads to the development of an updated model, and that model may then aid in the discovery of gold deposits.
A. Correct. The theory provides an explanation of ore formation, which aids in creating a conceptual model that may help explorers find gold deposits.
*
Besides, could I check the reasons of elimination of other four options?
(B) It suggests that certain geological formations, long believed to be mineralized, are in fact mineralized, thus confirming current conceptual models.
-->The recent theory is just a theory, so it cannot suggest that some things are indeed mineralized, right?
(C) It suggests that there may not be enough similarity across Archean-age gold-quartz vein systems to warrant the formulation of conceptual models.
-->The passage does not give any suggestion in this regard.
(D) It corrects existing theories about the chemical halos of gold deposits, and thus provides a basis for correcting current conceptual models.
-->Chemical halos are mentioned in descriptions of the high-tech prospecting methods, but the theories about chemical halos are not addressed in the passage, let alone correction to the theories.
(E) It suggests that simple prospecting methods still have a higher success rate in the discovery of gold deposits than do more modern methods.
-->I actually felt slightly interested at this option, since there seems to be several challenges in exploration of the deep buried gold (the passage indeed uses the word "challenge" in the beginning of the third paragraph.) But the adverb "still" in (E) is a red flag, because we know that most remaining gold deposits are deep buried and undetected under the simple prospecting methods.
Thank you for your time and thoughts!
Thank you for helping me learn.