Argument: Multiple global warming causes —> one of the major = ozone layer depletion.
Ozone layer depletion —> multiple effects (some positive/some negative) : one do them = rays enter and affect some animals
Option Analysis
A. All wavelengths are not harmful for eyes - Wrong. As mentioned above “some positive, some negative - but there can also be a case that all negative”. Hence we cannot generalise.
B. Human eyes are not infected by harmful wavelengths.
Wrong. The effect on human eyes has not been specified.
C Very few species of animals are exposed to these harmful wavelengths of light.
Wrong. Some may include ~ 48% or 10%. We cannot say very few.
D Some harmful radiations can easily enter earth’s environment due to ozone depletion
Correct. The statement clearly states that the radiation’s enter. Though we cannot ascertain the ease of entry, we can overlook that fact.
E Due to global warming, the temperature of the earth is increasing which in turn cause eye infection in some species of animals.
Wrong. Though it is known that temperature increases because of global warming, we are assuming the correlation of temperature increase and eye infection. The scope of argument does not cover this relation.
Posted from my mobile device