Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 27 Sep 2026, 02:16 |
It is currently 27 Sep 2026, 02:16 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 2701:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Sep 2807:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 28, 2026 - Oct. 16, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Sep 2911:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
" Description: Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thur Sept. 29, 2026 - Dec. 3, 2026, 11:00am-1:00pm EST
Oct 0102:00 AM EDT
-03:00 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
Oct 0107:00 AM BST
-08:00 AM GMT
Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event for Top MBA Programs! Buy tickets - Virtual series that’s all set to equip you to -excel in your MBA interviews.
Oct 0301:00 PM EDT
-04:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays Oct. 3, 2026 - Dec. 26, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm EST
31 Mar 2022, 07:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
VIGHNESHKAMATH
This sounds like an attempt to distill SC reasoning down to a list of memorized rules (something like: "if a 'to+verb' answers the question 'why?', it must be acting as an adverb that modifies the verb..."). Such rules are tempting. One less thing to think about on test day, right?
The problem is that "rules" like this encourage you to do the opposite of what you actually need to do on SC, which is to use your brain and think really hard about meaning and context every single time.
So, forget about coming up with a rule, and instead just ask yourself, "What does this word or phrase logically modify? And does that actually make sense?" The GMAT won't ever ask you to label parts of speech, and neither will we.
I hope that helps a bit!
Afn24
Joined: 03 Aug 2021
Last visit: 10 Aug 2026
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 194
Location: India
Schools: Columbia CBS '24 Darden '24 ESADE Fuqua '24 Haas '24 Harvard '24 Kellogg '24 LBS '24 Said '23 Sloan '24 Stanford '24 Wharton '24 Yale '24 Anderson '24 CEIBS '24
GMAT 1: 470 Q27 V28
GMAT 2: 590 Q43 V28
GMAT 3: 600 Q39 V34
Products:
Schools: Columbia CBS '24 Darden '24 ESADE Fuqua '24 Haas '24 Harvard '24 Kellogg '24 LBS '24 Said '23 Sloan '24 Stanford '24 Wharton '24 Yale '24 Anderson '24 CEIBS '24
GMAT 3: 600 Q39 V34
Posts: 80
Kudos:
26
09 Dec 2022, 06:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
Idiom Tested.
Substance X results from reaction Between A and B to produce C
(sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide) - Is nested Parallelism
So E is correct.
Substance X results from reaction Between A and B to produce C
(sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide) - Is nested Parallelism
So E is correct.
23 Nov 2023, 12:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
generis
MartyMurray KarishmaB GMATNinja
The meaning conveyed by (E) seems very wrong. I was stuck between (D) and (E), and (D) seemed to be the lesser of the two evils.
(E) seems to convey that "Acid rain and snow result from chemical reactions between X and Y to produce Z". It seems as though "Acid rain" and "snow" result from these chemical reactions with the intent to produce Z. How can that be possible? How can they have an intention?
I know this is an old question, but I need to know if I should be okay with such objects/phenomena having an intention.
23 Nov 2023, 23:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
SlowTortoise
This is common usage: 'Hydrogen and Oxygen combine to produce water' or 'Hydrogen reacts with Oxygen to produce water.'
There needn't be an actual intent. It just means 'it leads to this,' not 'with the intent to' here. You are reading too much into the use of 'to.' There are many many different contexts in which it is used.
