Last visit was: 17 Jun 2025, 22:59 It is currently 17 Jun 2025, 22:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 15,545
Own Kudos:
45,693
 [5]
Given Kudos: 6,057
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,545
Kudos: 45,693
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shikha2023gmat
Joined: 02 Apr 2023
Last visit: 18 Feb 2024
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 4
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Nielgmat
Joined: 08 Apr 2022
Last visit: 01 Apr 2024
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
135
 [4]
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 130
Kudos: 135
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mailolo
Joined: 08 Apr 2023
Last visit: 09 Nov 2023
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 10
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, MartyMurray . Request help with Q5. Earthquakes & drought both have been cited as possible causes of "migration" & not "demise". Option C states -evidence of earthquakes may shed light on "understanding of decline". Migration yes but decline? Also, in that sense option E is competent too coz it discusses the common effect of drought & earthquakes i.e change in course of rivers while C misses out on drought
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,509
Own Kudos:
4,826
 [3]
Given Kudos: 142
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,509
Kudos: 4,826
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mailolo
Hi, MartyMurray . Request help with Q5.
Here's an explanation for Question 5.

5. The author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements?

(A) Because the Indus Valley region is prone to earthquakes, it is most likely that an earthquake destroyed the Indus Valley civilization.

Scanning the passage for "earthquakes," we see that it says the following:

    Or, a massive earthquake in this seismically volatile region may have changed the course of rivers and disrupted many cities, spurring a migration of refugees to the countryside.

We see that the author mentions earthquakes as one possible cause of the disappearance of the Indus Valley civilization, not as the "most likely" cause.

So, in saying "it is most likely," this choice goes beyond what's supported by the passage.

Eliminate

(B) Only a disaster as catastrophic as an earthquake would have caused the demise of a civilization as sophisticated as the Indus Valley civilization.

The author says that evidence "suggests" that a major disaster caused the demise of the Indus Valley civilization but does not generalize that statement to one about "a civilization as sophisticated as the Indus Valley civilization." In other words the author does not suggest that the demise of any such civilization would be caused only by "a disaster as catastrophic as an earthquake."

So, this choice is not supported by the passage.

Eliminate.

(C) Archaeologists' understanding of the decline of the Indus Valley civilization would benefit from a search for signs of earthquake damage in its cities.

The author says the following about "understanding of the decline of the Indus Valley civilization."

    The causes of the civilization's decline, however, are not certain

Then, later in the passage the author suggests the following:

    Or, a massive earthquake in this seismically volatile region may have changed the course of rivers and disrupted many cities, spurring a migration of refugees to the countryside.

Given that the author says that the causes of the decline are "not certain" and indicates that one possible cause of the decline is "a massive earthquake," it makes sense that the author "would agree" that "Archaeologists' understanding of the decline of the Indus Valley civilization would benefit from a search for signs of earthquake damage in its cities." After all, such a search would likely help archeologists to determine whether a massive earthquake was indeed the cause of the decline.

Now, since the passage mentions that an earthquake may have spurred a "migration" whereas this choice mentions "the decline," some people may be reluctant to choose this choice because a "migration" may be different from a "decline." Here's the thing though.

The discussion of an earthquake causing migration appears in the context of the author's discussion of "the causes of the civilization's decline." Also, the author says that a disaster could have caused "the large empire disintegrating into many regional cultures," which would be a type of decline. So, we can presume that the author considers "migration of refugees to the countryside" a decline in the Indus Valley civilization, particularly since the author uses the word "refugees," which has connotations of a decline in circumstances associated with forced fleeing from a disaster.

So, this choice is supported by the passage.

Keep.

(D) The cities of the Indus Valley civilization should have been better prepared for the possibility of a major earthquake.

The author neither says or implies anything about the level of preparation for an earthquake of the cities of the Indus Valley civilization or what the cities "should" have done.

Also, the author doesn't even conclude that earthquakes caused the demise of the Indus Valley civilization.

Eliminate.

(E) The demise of the Indus Valley civilization was most likely caused by the catastrophic alteration of the courses of its major rivers.

Scanning the passage for information on "alteration of the courses of its major rivers," we see the following:

    a massive earthquake in this seismically volatile region may have changed the course of rivers and disrupted many cities

We see that the author mentions "alteration," or change of the courses of rivers as one possible cause of the disappearance of the Indus Valley civilization, not as the "most likely" cause.

So, in saying "was most likely caused," this choice goes beyond what the passage supports.

Eliminate.

The correct answer is (C).
User avatar
mailolo
Joined: 08 Apr 2023
Last visit: 09 Nov 2023
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 10
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@MartyMurphy Thanks , much appreciated!
User avatar
AkankshaUniyal
Joined: 02 Aug 2021
Last visit: 07 Jun 2024
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 41
Location: India
Posts: 19
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone explain question 6, Please?
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 15,545
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,057
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,545
Kudos: 45,693
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AkankshaUniyal
Can someone explain question 6, Please?

Explanation

6. The author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements about archaeological investigations. into the Indus Valley civilization?

Difficulty Level: Hard

Explanation

Step 1: Identify the Question Type

The question asks for something with which the author is “most likely to agree,” making this an Inference question.

Step 2: Research the Relevant Text

The question asks about archaeological investigations into the Indus Valley civilization. That’s discussed generally in the first paragraph, with the remaining paragraphs providing details gleaned from recent investigations.

Step 3: Make a Prediction

There are lots of details in the passage, so start by identifying the major themes. The first paragraph shows how the civilization was “long considered archaeologically uninteresting” but is now being seen as “without parallel” thanks to recent investigations. The next two paragraphs provide evidence from those recent investigations. And the last paragraph shows how recent investigations counter at least one longstanding theory and provide evidence for alternate theories. Start with those ideas, and use clues in the answer choices to do research as necessary.

Step 4: Evaluate the Answer Choices

(B) is correct. This is supported by the first and last paragraphs. In the first paragraph, it’s only the recent research that has revealed evidence of the region’s unique nature. And in the last paragraph, the recent research is responsible for countering a long-standing theory that now looks to be unreliable.

(A) is Out of Scope. There is no suggestion that any data was controlled by a small group of scholars.

(C) is Extreme. The Sumerian tablets mentioned in lines 32–34 do refer to the civilization, but there’s no indication that those tablets contain the only written references.

(D) is an Extreme Distortion. The author never says that archaeologists have misinterpreted most data. In fact, the author never suggests an misinterpretation at all. It’s just that the new data provides a more complete picture that was previously unknown.

(E) is Out of Scope. There is no suggestion of any recent trends in archaeology in general, nor is there any indication that archaeologists rely too much on written evidence.

Answer: B
User avatar
danymasri98
Joined: 01 Nov 2022
Last visit: 29 Nov 2024
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 634
Location: Lebanon
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V37
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
Posts: 42
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could you post the solution for question 3?
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 15,545
Own Kudos:
45,693
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,057
GPA: 3.62
Posts: 15,545
Kudos: 45,693
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
danymasri98
Could you post the solution for question 3?

Explanation

3. Based on the passage, which one of the following most accurately describes the author's stance regarding Wheeler's theory?

Difficulty Level: 550

Explanation

Step 1: Identify the Question Type

The question asks for the “author’s stance” on Wheeler’s theory, as “based on the passage.” That makes this an Inference question.

Step 2: Research the Relevant Text

Wheeler’s theory is in the fourth paragraph, and the author’s reaction to that theory begins on line 41.

Step 3: Make a Prediction

Wheeler’s theory is about the cause of the civilization’s decline. Wheeler claims the people were massacred by Indo-Aryans. But, the author is quick to dismiss that theory by pointing out the “lack of written evidence” (line 42) as well as the lack of “archaeological evidence” (lines 44–45). And the author goes on to show how the newly excavated evidence supports an alternative explanation: The civilization just moved and got split up (lines 49–53). The correct answer should point out the author’s reasoned dismissal of Wheeler’s theory.

Step 4: Evaluate the Answer Choices

(E) is correct. The author used the new evidence to reject Wheeler’s theory, and the author is absolutely clear about it.

(A) is opposite. The author rejects the theory, so it would hardly be considered a worthy contribution to archaeology.

(B) is opposite. The author does not accept anything about the theory.

(C) is a Distortion. The disagreement comes across as rather forceful, not slight. And there’s no indication that the author has any respect for the theory.

(D) is an Extreme Distortion. The author does reject the theory, but never goes so far as to say it was completely unworthy of any attention whatsoever. It was probably worth considering at one point, but now seems obsolete because of the newly found evidence.

Answer: E
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7331 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15545 posts