Coldfire wrote:
For me this is analogous to saying that : a person is a criminal beacuse he uses guns to kill innocent people.
A.C ''D'' Says
its like saying that : ''A person is a criminal because he uses guns'' A/C D is just incomplete, it's not sufficient to employ scientific methods, but you have to employ them to examine the questions raised.. just like it is not sufficient to be a criminal if you use guns, but you have to use them to kill innocent people..
I feel like A/C ''D'' omits a mandatory condition for a field of study to be a geniune scientific entreprise.
Can you help me find the breach in this reasoning ?
thank you
Hi Coldfire,
You're right about the fact that option D does not include a mandatory condition for a field of study to be a genuine scientific enterprise. It is, however, sufficient.
To understand this in your example, we can go with something like this:
P1: X uses guns to kill innocent people.
SA: {Anyone who uses guns to kill innocent people is a criminal}
C: Therefore, X is a criminal.
Here's
an explanation of this question. If you want to work on the concepts needed to solve assumption questions in general, you could go through the session on assumption questions in my
cr respawn course: