MrWhite
Hi Ajitesh, hope your exam went well

Am sitting mine on Monday 😅
I wanted to ask:
1) how representative Mocks 1-6 are for the real exam, if possible section wise comment (quant/verbal/DI)
2) what is the relative difficulty for quant/verbal compared to classic?
3) Did you feel the test to be section adaptive? (Performance in 1 section determines difficulty of initial questions on the next?)
4) Were the RC passages long (ie 2-3 long paragraphs or 1 long paragraph or 2 short para)? In my experience with official mocks all of them were either 1 long para or 2 medium paragraph with max 4-5 questions per RC.
5) Was DS more logic / statistics based? Questions from OG and DI review seem to be less pure math and more applied based. Wanted to see how the real exam is.
6) if you could give a rough breakdown of topics for quant / verbal that you encountered eg: even mix of percentage/overlapping set questions, bold face Cr etc
I know am being ambitious with my questions, but answers to some of them above, especially Q1-3 would be really insightful! Thanks for being open to questions, appreciate the gesture!
Hi MrWhite,
I'll just say that the part that I was interested in went very well.
1. The mocks are quite representative as far as the verbal section is concerned. I've seen some mocks with 13 RC questions and others with just 10. There were a couple of questions in the mocks that I didn't really find to be clear, but I didn't see anything like that during my actual test. DI was different for me, but this may just have been bad luck, as I got a heavy MSR.
2. Similar (verbal: high confidence).
3. I was looking for this, but I couldn't tell whether the algorithm was doing anything new behind the scenes.
4. I got two medium (a little less than 1 screen height) and two long (~1.5 screen height) passages. I didn't get any short passages.
5. Yes, I did feel that they were deprioritising quant in DS.
6. I got one boldface question in verbal. I didn't even try to track topics in quant.
All the best for your test!