Among tennis fans, vigorous debate has raged about whether Roger Feder

Question

Among tennis fans, vigorous debate has raged about  whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and whether either should be  dubbed “the greatest player of all time.”

(A) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and whether either should be

(B) if Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and if either should be

(C) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether they will have been

(D) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether either should be
 
(E) if Roger Federer is better than Rafael Nadal and one or the other will be

Day 5 Question of the Verbal Contest:  GMAT Club RATT Race  
Please make sure to post a brief reply without revealing your solution to enter the contest!

https://gmatclub.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/unnamed.jpg

Nevernevergiveup · Accepted Answer

We have 2 3-2 splits among the answer choices here.

1. If vs Whether
2. better vs best

There is no conditional scenario here so if is not preferred.  Thus eliminating B and E. 
There are only two people in comparison here............Federer and Nadal.............so comparative form better is used rather than superlative form best......... This eliminates A and C and thus retaining only D.

(A) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the  best  player and whether either should be....... incorrect due to best as describes above.
 
(B) if Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and if either should be.......... conditional if plays the spoilsport here.

(C) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether they will have been........ .this removes the  best  error but introduces pronoun error with  they . they seem to refer fans incorrectly.

(D)  whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and 
whether either should be  
 
(E) if Roger Federer is better than Rafael Nadal and one or the other will be............. this contains conditional if error and also changes the intended meaning due to change in comparison structure and future tense will be is incorrect here

tarunk31 · Answer

Among tennis fans, vigorous debate has raged about whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and whether either should be dubbed “the greatest player of all time.”

among fans debate is about two things who is better and whether either should be dubbed “the greatest player of all time.” We cannot say that A is best than B. When we are comparing two things we should use comparative adjectives such as better.
 Let's do POE

(A) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and whether either should be

Best is wrong as explanined above.
 
(B) if Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and if either should be

Best is not correct and better should be used instead.
 
 if introduces a condition that if A then B. Here we are talking about a preference therefore whether should be used. Whenever in confusion regarding whether to use if or whether. Restructure the sentence in if A then B form. Further "whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player" is a noun clause/substantive clause which basically acts as a noun. Before this noun clause we have preposition about. So "about whether...." is basically a prepositional phrase. This is fine. If always introduces a dependent clause and if clause cannot be the object of preposition (here "about"). Object of prepositions are always nouns(including noun phrases and noun clauses).
 
(C) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether they will have been

"will have been" indicates future perfect progressive tense that implies that something will be going on before a specified time in the future. First error therefore is that future time is not specified here and progressive tense doesn't make sense. Further, from the meaning of original sentence we are talking about either of them should be dubbed greatest in the "present" and not in the "future".
 
(D) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether either should be

This is fine. Better is used for comparison between two players. Sentence is in present tense.
 
(E) if Roger Federer is better than Rafael Nadal and one or the other will be

if is wrong as analyzed above. Further "one" and "other" don't go together. One another and each other are idiomatic pairs.

QuanVsVerb · Answer

split #1 if vs whether
split #2 better vs best
split #3 either vs they

pushkar2014 · Answer

Among tennis fans, vigorous debate has raged about whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and whether either should be dubbed “the greatest player of all time.”

(A) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and whether either should be ......... best is wrong . we are comparing two people 
 
(B) if Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the best player and if either should be .......... WHETHER is preferred . IF is used for conditionals
 
(C) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether they will have been ........  they will have been ...is awkward and verbose
 
(D) whether Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal is the better player and whether either should be............ correct choice

(E) if Roger Federer is better than Rafael Nadal and one or the other will be........... IF is used for conditionals .

souvik101990 · Answer

This sentence as written contains an error: When two things (or people in this case) are compared, the correct form of the word is “better,” not “best.”

Eliminate choice (A).

In the answer choices, there is a 3-2 split between “whether” and “if.” Because two people are being compared, “whether” is correct. “If” is generally not used in comparisons but only for the conditional, as in “If Roger Federer wins another Grand Slam title, he will be the greatest tennis player of all time.”

Eliminate choices (B) and (E) on this basis. (For the record, there are other problems with these two choices as well. Choice (B) contains the same error (“best”) as the original. And by changing the verb at the end from “should be” to “will be,” choice (E) alters the meaning of the sentence.)

Read choices (C) and (D) in parallel. They are alike until near the end, where (C) uses the pronoun “they” and (D) uses “either.” The subject of the clause is “Roger Federer or Rafael Nadal,” and because of the “or” and because each noun in the compound subject is singular, verbs and pronouns relating to the subject should be singular. The verb “is” is correctly used in both choices, but the plural “they” is incorrect in (C). Additionally, choice (C) uses the future perfect verb tense “will have been,” which alters the meaning of the sentence.

Answer choice (D) is correct.

JenniferAtKaplan · Answer

Congratulations to those of you who answered this tricky question correctly!

There were some votes for (A) as the correct answer, so let's see what we can learn from this particular trap. Always read carefully for meaning. There are two separate "whether" clauses in this sentence, and it's tempting to conflate their meanings, but if you read the second of them carefully, you'll see that whether either of these two players should be dubbed the greatest player ever is arguable. So, the first clause can't be saying that one of the two is the best ever. What about the best currently? If the writer of this sentence meant to say that, she would have placed a descriptive phrase in the first "whether" clause to introduce the "now" vs. "ever" contrast: "whether either is the best player among all current tennis players and whether either should be dubbed the greatest player of all time". There is no indication in the first "whether" clause to indicate that the writer means to make a distinction between "best at the moment" and "best ever," so we have to conclude that the first "whether" clause is merely asking about these two players compared to each other. Whenever you compare just two people or things, the correct idiom is the comparative, not the superlative: "the better of the two." This is the reason to eliminate (A).

sun01 · Answer

Why 'the' in comparative form.

I have never seen its use in comparison of two people or things.

Ramesh is longer than shyam.

Please clarify.

sayantanc2k · Answer

The demonstrative adjective "the" refers to the "player". When the structure  comparative adjective + than  is used , "the" is not to be used. However this is not such a case. The better player is definite here (observe the usage of "the" at the beginning of this sentence) and thus "the" is used: to refer to the "player", not to "better". Consider the following examples:

1. Who is THE better player between Roger and Nadal?
2. Roger is THE better player between Roger and Nadal.

Both the above sentences are correct and "the" refers to the definite player who is better between Roger and Nadal.

However we would not use "the" in the following case:

3.Who plays better?
4. Roger plays better than Nadal.

In example 3 and 4, there is no "player", hence no "the".

Rajeet123 · Answer

Can you please tell me when exactly should one use "If" and when should one use "whether". I always get confused.

amuban · Answer

The correct option is D.
Here we dont have any conditional scenario. Thus if should be avoided.
And whenever we compare between two things, we should go with comparitive form rather than superlative form.

So based on the aformentioned rules we can easily get the answer.
The correct answer should have whether & better................................

Abhishek009 · Answer

Please find here : https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-vs-whether-162818.html

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Among tennis fans, vigorous debate has raged about whether Roger Feder

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Among tennis fans, vigorous debate has raged about whether Roger Feder

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards