Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 09:31 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 09:31
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,826
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,826
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 19 Nov 2021, 09:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Naptiste
Hello,

I can't understand why a "possible workshop" is wrong? Can anyone precisely explain please ?

With which nouns can we use "possible"?

Are there other words similar to "possible", (restricted when used as adjectives)?

Would be very helpful, thanks!
Show more
Have you tried reviewing our last post?

Trying to memorize a list of nouns that can work with "possible" unfortunately isn't the way to go -- it's all about the context. In the context of this sentence, "possible workshop" doesn't really make sense. But that doesn't mean that "possible workshop" is always wrong, as we mentioned earlier:

Quote:
... I suppose, in theory, you could write about a potential workshop -- perhaps an abandoned warehouse that could one day be converted into a workshop, for instance.
Show more
As always, once you've eliminated any definite errors, you have to think really hard about the differences in meaning among the remaining choices and determine which choice is the best. Unfortunately there's no easy away around this sort of thing. :?

I hope that helps a bit!
User avatar
Jitu20
User avatar
Joined: 02 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
27
Given Kudos: 26
Schools: ESADE Fuqua '24 Judge '23 NUS Rotman '24 Bocconi
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
Schools: ESADE Fuqua '24 Judge '23 NUS Rotman '24 Bocconi
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
Posts: 53
Kudos: 27
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 11 Oct 2022, 00:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja, RonTargetTestPrep , GMATninja2 MartyTargetTestPrep I have read the above explanations regarding option C, however I am not fully convinced. Could you explain your approach to deciding between B and C, also unsure regarding what might be/ what might have been constructions and when they are used.
User avatar
himanshu0123
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Last visit: 20 Mar 2023
Posts: 189
Own Kudos:
5
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 189
Kudos: 5
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 11 Oct 2022, 01:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in B] what is the antecedent for 'what'?

typically I see sentences with 'what' ambiguous and awkward on Gmat. do you remember such examples?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 7,391
Own Kudos:
70,826
Given Kudos: 2,133
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,391
Kudos: 70,826
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 19 Oct 2022, 15:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jitu20
GMATNinja, RonTargetTestPrep , GMATninja2 MartyTargetTestPrep I have read the above explanations regarding option C, however I am not fully convinced. Could you explain your approach to deciding between B and C, also unsure regarding what might be/ what might have been constructions and when they are used.
Show more
If Tim eats what might have been a hamster, he's eating an animal and there's a chance that this animal was a hamster. Not a terribly appetizing thought, but not illogical either.

If Tim eats a possible hamster, it suggests that Tim actually ate a hamster, and this hamster happens to have the characteristic of "possible." This is nonsense. The hamster either exists or it doesn't!

Same deal here. If an excavation takes place at what might have been a workshop, it means there's a structure that could have been a workshop, but we don't know for sure. That's fine. Keep (B).

If an excavation takes place at a possible workshop, it means the structure was, in fact, a workshop, and this workshop was of the "possible" variety. This is nonsense. Kill (C).

I hope that helps!
User avatar
perseverance2021
User avatar
Joined: 26 May 2021
Last visit: 25 Dec 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 21
Posts: 14
Kudos: 2
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 28 Sep 2023, 00:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BillyZ
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including 7 intact statues.

(A) what might have been a workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including
(B) what might have been a workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures and
(C) the site of a possible workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures and
(D) the site of a possible workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including
(E) the site of a possible workshop where statues might have been reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including


SC24561.01
Show more

Hi AjiteshArun ,

Including is a preposition also. Is it because of comma before 'including', it is considered here as present participle ?

Thanks
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,627
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,627
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 28 Sep 2023, 02:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perseverance2021

"Including" is never a preposition. Prepositions are relational words like of, in, by, around, etc. Like most -ing words, it is typically a present participle. Some -ing words can also be gerunds (nouns), but that doesn't work here.

I'm curious what issue you're seeing, though, since no one mentioned participles in their explanation. Is there a usage that's bothering you?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
5,140
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 28 Sep 2023, 22:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perseverance2021
Hi AjiteshArun ,

Including is a preposition also. Is it because of comma before 'including', it is considered here as present participle ?

Thanks
Show more
Hi perseverance2021,

That's an interesting question. Although it is a word derived from a verb (and in some cases it retains some properties of verbs and even coordinators), including is used almost exclusively as a preposition. Any good dictionary (1, 2, 3, 4...) will also classify including as a preposition.

We can look at other ways of using including, but as far as the GMAT is concerned, we should generally not expect including to follow the rules that apply to structures like present participles. You could also go through this discussion on including [1:42:40]:


TL;DR: We should not look at including as a normal "comma -ing" on the GMAT.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
5,140
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 28 Sep 2023, 22:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
perseverance2021

"Including" is never a preposition. Prepositions are relational words like of, in, by, around, etc. Like most -ing words, it is typically a present participle. Some -ing words can also be gerunds (nouns), but that doesn't work here.

I'm curious what issue you're seeing, though, since no one mentioned participles in their explanation. Is there a usage that's bothering you?
Show more
Hi DmitryFarber,

Is there a reason you prefer to analyse including as a present participle rather than as a preposition? I would think that the use of including as a present participle is extremely limited compared to its use as a preposition.
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,627
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,627
 [1]
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 30 Sep 2023, 22:58
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To be honest, it just never occurred to me that the common uses of "including" would lead people to categorize it as a preposition. I can see the reasoning, and I bow to the sources cited, so I will stand corrected here. However, I'm not sure the classification changes anything about the reasoning required to reach the answer.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,079
Own Kudos:
5,140
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,079
Kudos: 5,140
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 01 Oct 2023, 19:15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
To be honest, it just never occurred to me that the common uses of "including" would lead people to categorize it as a preposition. I can see the reasoning, and I bow to the sources cited, so I will stand corrected here. However, I'm not sure the classification changes anything about the reasoning required to reach the answer.
Show more
Fair enough. I think most test takers know how to use including, but being told that including is a present participle could cause some confusion, because test takers may try to apply what they've learnt about present participles to words like including (my point is not specific to this question).

Thank you for clarifying your position.
User avatar
Raman109
User avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Jul 2025
Posts: 705
Own Kudos:
212
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 705
Kudos: 212
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where 20 Jan 2024, 10:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
An archaeological excavation at what might have been a workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including 7 intact statues.

Option Elimination -

(A) what might have been a workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including - " what might have been a workshop" is a noun clause acting as an object of a preposition "at." The usage of present perfect "have been" is correct as the "speculation" of this place being a workshop started in the past and continuous to the present. Comma + including can modify the clause and, more importantly, the nearest noun, as GMATIntensive has also pointed out. Here, "including" modifies the "human figures" and it doesn't make sense to say that fragments included "intact statues." Wrong.

(B) what might have been a workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures and - ok

(C) the site of a possible workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures and - We can say "digital workshop," "Gen AI workshop," "foundry workshop," but there is nothing like "possible workshop," or "impossible workshop." - Wrong.

(D) the site of a possible workshop where statues were reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including - the same issue as of C and comma + including.

(E) the site of a possible workshop where statues might have been reproduced yielded 1,532 fragments of human figures, including- the same issue as of C and comma + including.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
507 posts
bhanu29
363 posts