Last visit was: 17 May 2024, 21:11 It is currently 17 May 2024, 21:11
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# An engineering firm has suggested the construction of an underwater oi

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93334
Own Kudos [?]: 624556 [2]
Given Kudos: 81898
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 93334
Own Kudos [?]: 624556 [0]
Given Kudos: 81898
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2019
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 17 [0]
Given Kudos: 102
GMAT 1: 600 Q43 V30
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2017
Posts: 250
Own Kudos [?]: 122 [0]
Given Kudos: 64
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V31
GRE 1: Q169 V160
GPA: 2.83
Re: An engineering firm has suggested the construction of an underwater oi [#permalink]
Took 3 Minutes. Imo C is the answer.

A. The first explains circumstances that call the position taken by the author into question; the second holds factual information which contradicts that position.----> the first is not a circumstance that is called into question. Reject

B. The first provides a description of a certain factor that may weaken the argument's favored viewpoint; the second is that viewpoint.-------> First might be correct but second is wrong as its not the argument's favored viewpoint. second provides a reason or a goal to be achieved.

C. The first is a comparison formulated in order to establish grounds for the argument's conclusion; the second is the aim leading to that conclusion. Correct. First is definitely a comparison between the two types of bridges.Second is definitely an aim as 'it says in order to reduce xxxx'

D. The first is evidence in support of the position that the argument chooses to undermine; the second is the reasoning behind the questioning of that position. First is not a piece of evidence. It says 'would'

E. The first is a proposal that is supported by the position of the argument; the second is further evidence used to strengthen that proposal. First is not a proposal and its not supported by the position of the argument. The position of the argument and 1st bold faced sentence are in opposite directions.
Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2020
Posts: 148
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
An engineering firm has suggested the construction of an underwater oi [#permalink]
Lets move sentence by sentence -

1) SUGGESTIO - Construction of oil pipe to connect the source of oil with the power stations
2) FACT - Route contains 1.3 m wide river and building the bridge costs twice
3) REASONING - to reduce the risk of water pollution due to rupture
4) CONCLUSION - Government has rightly planned to build a bridge

BOLDFACE 1 - Fact - Tone not specified in the argument
BOLDFACE 2 - Reasoning - in the direction of conclusion

ANSWER CHOICE ANALYSIS -

A)
First explains the circumstances - CORRECT, call the position in the question - INCORRECT
Second holds factual information - INCORRECT

B)
First a description of certain factor - CORRECT, which may weaken the argument - CORRECT
Second is that viewpoint - INCORRECT

C)
First is a comparison - CORRECT, to establish grounds for conclusion - CORRECT
Second is the aim leading to conclusion - CORRECT

D)
First is an evidence - CORRECT, support the position which is undermined -INCORRECT
Second is the reasoning - CORRECT, behind questioning of that position - INCORRECT

E)
First is proposal - INCORRECT, supported by the position - INCORRECT
Second is the evidence - CORRECT, used to strengthen that proposal - INCORRECT

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17311
Own Kudos [?]: 851 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: An engineering firm has suggested the construction of an underwater oi [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: An engineering firm has suggested the construction of an underwater oi [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6929 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts