NEW HERE? LEARN MORE
closeclose
Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:12 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:12
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New posts
New comers' posts

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel

Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags:
Find Similar Topics 
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
L
akela
VP
VP
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 1232
Own Kudos [?]: 4555 [48]
Given Kudos: 128
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 26 Aug 2018, 10:17
4
Kudos
44
Bookmarks
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:18) correct 45% (02:09) wrong based on 1048 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans interbred with Neanderthals, but DNA testing of a Neanderthal’s remains indicates that this is not the case. The DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the anthropologist’s argument?

(A) At least some Neanderthals lived at the same time and in the same places as prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans.
(B) DNA testing of remains is significantly less reliable than DNA testing of samples from living species.
(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.
(D) Neanderthals and prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans were completely isolated from each other geographically.
(E) Any similarity in the DNA of two species must be the result of interbreeding.

Resource: LSAT
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C

Originally posted by akela on 01 Aug 2017, 21:26.
Last edited by akela on 26 Aug 2018, 10:17, edited 1 time in total.
avatar
B
therick79
Current Student
Joined: 27 Jul 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [2]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: United States (MS)
Schools: Owen '23 (A) Booth Exec MBA '23 (A) Kellogg (D) CBS (S) UCLA Anderson (D) NYU Stern (WL) Mendoza'23 (WD)
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   01 Aug 2017, 23:48
2
Kudos
I don't know what is technically the right answer, but I'd have to pick A. That seems to me to fit the best.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
User avatar
G
akshayk
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 280
Own Kudos [?]: 370 [3]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Send PM
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   02 Aug 2017, 09:35
3
Kudos
Akela wrote:
Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans interbred with Neanderthals, but DNA testing of a Neanderthal’s remains indicates that this is not the case. The DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal.

Old Belief - Prehistoric homesapinen ancestors of contemporary humans interbred with Neanderthals.
Contradiction - DNA testing of Neanderthal remains indicates this is NOT the case.
Result - DNA of contemporary humans is SIGNIFICANTLY different from that of N's.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the anthropologist’s argument?
Quote:
(A) At least some Neanderthals lived at the same time and in the same places as prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans.

The argument is about the similarity or lack thereof of the DNA, so this is irrelevant. OUT!


Quote:
(B) DNA testing of remains is significantly less reliable than DNA testing of samples from living species.

This is a far-fetched assumption that LSAT has made for us, but the argument in no shape or form refers to this idea. OUT!


Quote:
(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.

If pre-historic homosapien's interbred with neanderthals, then the author would have to assume that the contemporary human's DNA has not evolved at all to showcase similarity. And is further proven as the researcher test the DNA of contemporary humans with neanderthals. This is a good option. KEEP!


Quote:
(D) Neanderthals and prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans were completely isolated from each other geographically.

Contradicts the old belief i.e. the premise so this is OUT!


Quote:
(E) Any similarity in the DNA of two species must be the result of interbreeding.

Let's say this is true, but we did not find any overlap in the DNA. Does that mean they did not interbreed especially when we have not compared the DNA of prehistoric homosapiens with neanderthals. Close, but C is better. This is OUT too!

C is the right answer.
User avatar
B
saurabhSuman
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   05 Sep 2017, 19:25
from what I understand in choice C is Unlike DNA of Homo Sapiens, DNA of contemporary humans are much more closer to Neanderthals.
but the argument says otherwise "The DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal."
akshayk
Can you please elaborate on what you mean by "evolving to showcase similarity" in these lines
"If pre-historic homosapien's interbred with neanderthals, then the author would have to assume that the contemporary human's DNA has not evolved at all to showcase similarity. And is further proven as the researcher test the DNA of contemporary humans with neanderthals. This is a good option. KEEP!
"
User avatar
L
arvind910619
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   Updated on: 09 Sep 2017, 02:59
Hi mikemcgarry

I chose E but that is not the answer .
C is the answer .
I chose option E because it says similarity in DNA is caused by interbreeding than the DNAs are different and that is why the conclusion follows.
Regarding C I did not understood it in the first place but I'm more close reading it says that the DNA of ancestors is not more similar to the DNA of the Neanderthal than the DNA of the modern human beings .
Please help me in my reasoning and what is rationale for C to be the correct answer

Originally posted by arvind910619 on 06 Sep 2017, 02:20.
Last edited by arvind910619 on 09 Sep 2017, 02:59, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
L
gmatexam439
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [1]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: McDonough '21 (A$) Jones '21 (A$) Kelley '23 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   09 Sep 2017, 01:29
1
Kudos
Masshole wrote:
Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans interbred with Neanderthals, but DNA testing of a Neanderthal’s remains indicates that this is not the case. The DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the anthropologist’s argument?

(A) At least some Neanderthals lived at the same time and in the same places as prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans.
(B) DNA testing of remains is significantly less reliable than DNA testing of samples from living species.
(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.
(D) Neanderthals and prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans were completely isolated from each other geographically.
(E) Any similarity in the DNA of two species must be the result of interbreeding.

Resource: LSAT


abhimahna
Please explain option C and E. Why is C correct and E wrong?
The conclusion of the argument is that "the ancestors didn't breed with neanderthals". I think E correctly shows that.

Regards
User avatar
L
abhimahna
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [0]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   09 Sep 2017, 02:21
Expert Reply
gmatexam439 wrote:
abhimahna
Please explain option C and E. Why is C correct and E wrong?
The conclusion of the argument is that "the ancestors didn't breed with neanderthals". I think E correctly shows that.

Regards


Hi gmatexam439 ,

Here is the catch. We are told that since their DNAs donot match, they didn't interbreed.

Note that we cannot NEVER assume that if they match they MUST interbreed.

This is a common mistake that we all do.

Take the following example:

If I am an Indian IT Male, I cannot get into Harvard.

Now, if you say the following, it would be 100% incorrect.

If I am not an Indian IT Make, I must get into Harvard. Really?? What if I am chinese?

So, be extremely careful about such situations.

C is correctly saying that DNA doesn't change in time, meaning my current DNAs are similar to the DNAs of my ex-ex-ex-ex-ex grand parent.

Does that make sense?
User avatar
L
arvind910619
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [0]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   09 Sep 2017, 02:59
Hi mikemcgarry

I chose E but that is not the answer .
C is the answer .
I chose option E because it says similarity in DNA is caused by interbreeding than the DNAs are different and that is why the conclusion follows.
Regarding C I did not understood it in the first place but I'm more close reading it says that the DNA of ancestors is not more similar to the DNA of the Neanderthal than the DNA of the modern human beings .
Please help me in my reasoning and what is rationale for C to be the correct answer
User avatar
B
subrataroy0210
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2015
Posts: 60
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [3]
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
Schools: IIMA (D) ISB '19 (WD) IIMB (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   09 Sep 2017, 04:35
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans interbred with Neanderthals, but DNA testing of a Neanderthal’s remains indicates that this is not the case. The DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal.

Conclusion: Since DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal, the prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans did not interbreed with Neanderthals.

Falsification Situation:
1) What if the remains only give partial information about the DNA of the Neanderthals?
2) It is not necessary that when A and B breed, the offspring C will have the DNA traces of both A and B in a significant amount.

Possible assumptions:
1) DNA does not destroy with time and thus the remains do not provide any partial information.
2) The offspring has DNA traces of both the parents in significant proportion.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the anthropologist’s argument?

(A) At least some Neanderthals lived at the same time and in the same places as prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans.
Negate: No Neanderthals lived at the same time and in the same places as prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans.
This rather supports the fact that prehistoric Homo sapiens and Neanderthals did not breed; they never got a chance.

(B) DNA testing of remains is significantly less reliable than DNA testing of samples from living species.
Negate: DNA testing of remains is significantly reliable than DNA testing of samples from living species.
This means that the DNA testing of the remains is reliable and thus the conclusion is okay.

(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.
Negate: The DNA of PHS ancestors of contemporary humans was significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.
This information tells us that the PHS is not the ancestors of contemporary human as the DNA will not match. This information destroys the conclusion from within because it makes us believe that the DNA-testing is faulty. This option is a possible conclusion.

(D) Neanderthals and prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans were completely isolated from each other geographically.
Negate: Neanderthals and prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans were not completely isolated from each other geographically.
This does not affect the conclusion.

(E) Any similarity in the DNA of two species must be the result of interbreeding.
Negate: No similarity in the DNA of two species must be the result of interbreeding.
As per the argument, the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of the remains of Neanderthals are significantly different but we cannot say that there is no similarity between them. Thus, this information does not affect the conclusion.
User avatar
L
gmatexam439
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [0]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: McDonough '21 (A$) Jones '21 (A$) Kelley '23 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   10 Sep 2017, 03:12
abhimahna wrote:
gmatexam439 wrote:
abhimahna
Please explain option C and E. Why is C correct and E wrong?
The conclusion of the argument is that "the ancestors didn't breed with neanderthals". I think E correctly shows that.

Regards


Hi gmatexam439 ,

Here is the catch. We are told that since their DNAs donot match, they didn't interbreed.

Note that we cannot NEVER assume that if they match they MUST interbreed.

This is a common mistake that we all do.

Take the following example:

If I am an Indian IT Male, I cannot get into Harvard.

Now, if you say the following, it would be 100% incorrect.

If I am not an Indian IT Make, I must get into Harvard. Really?? What if I am chinese?

So, be extremely careful about such situations.

C is correctly saying that DNA doesn't change in time, meaning my current DNAs are similar to the DNAs of my ex-ex-ex-ex-ex grand parent.

Does that make sense?


Hi @abhimanha Bro,

The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors (father) of contemporary humans (child) was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals (step mom) than is the DNA of contemporary humans (child).

This argument is basically saying father's dna wasn't similar to step-mom's dna. father's dna was similar to dna of child.

So we are basically stating that dna of father and child are same that's why they are ancestors and successors. but the same is not the case with step-mom and child.

Is my understanding of the statement correct?

Regards
User avatar
L
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6917
Own Kudos [?]: 63649 [4]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   10 Sep 2017, 08:53
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
arvind910619 wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry

I chose E but that is not the answer .
C is the answer .
I chose option E because it says similarity in DNA is caused by interbreeding than the DNAs are different and that is why the conclusion follows.
Regarding C I did not understood it in the first place but I'm more close reading it says that the DNA of ancestors is not more similar to the DNA of the Neanderthal than the DNA of the modern human beings .
Please help me in my reasoning and what is rationale for C to be the correct answer

Quote:
(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.

The author uses the evidence that "the DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal" to conclude that prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans did NOT interbreed with Neanderthals. In other words, according to the author, if the PHS ancestors of contemporary humans HAD interbred with Neanderthals, the DNA of the Neanderthal would have been passed down to contemporary humans and there would not be significant differences between the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of the Neanderthal.

If we negate choice (C), that would mean that the differences between the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of their PHS ancestors are COMPARABLE to the differences between the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of the Neanderthal. This would tells us that we CANNOT rely on similarity of DNA to determine whether contemporary humans descended from a particular group (since we KNOW that contemporary humans descended from their PHS ancestors).

This would nullify the author's evidence, so choice (C) is the best answer.

I hope this helps!
User avatar
L
arvind910619
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Status:Learning
Posts: 876
Own Kudos [?]: 566 [1]
Given Kudos: 755
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   11 Sep 2017, 06:40
1
Kudos
GMATNinja wrote:
arvind910619 wrote:
Hi mikemcgarry

I chose E but that is not the answer .
C is the answer .
I chose option E because it says similarity in DNA is caused by interbreeding than the DNAs are different and that is why the conclusion follows.
Regarding C I did not understood it in the first place but I'm more close reading it says that the DNA of ancestors is not more similar to the DNA of the Neanderthal than the DNA of the modern human beings .
Please help me in my reasoning and what is rationale for C to be the correct answer

Quote:
(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.

The author uses the evidence that "the DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal" to conclude that prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans did NOT interbreed with Neanderthals. In other words, according to the author, if the PHS ancestors of contemporary humans HAD interbred with Neanderthals, the DNA of the Neanderthal would have been passed down to contemporary humans and there would not be significant differences between the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of the Neanderthal.

If we negate choice (C), that would mean that the differences between the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of their PHS ancestors are COMPARABLE to the differences between the DNA of contemporary humans and the DNA of the Neanderthal. This would tells us that we CANNOT rely on similarity of DNA to determine whether contemporary humans descended from a particular group (since we KNOW that contemporary humans descended from their PHS ancestors).

This would nullify the author's evidence, so choice (C) is the best answer.

I hope this helps!

Hi GMATNinja ,

Thanks for the wonderful explanation.

Regards,
Arvind
User avatar
P
Kritisood
Director
Director
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Posts: 521
Own Kudos [?]: 1034 [0]
Given Kudos: 1091
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Send PM
Reviews Badge
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   17 Dec 2019, 04:54
I was down to C and E because of POE, but didnt really understand C, hence chose E. After reading C 5 plus times, i still cant understand how it proves that contemporary humans DNA hasnt evolved at all to showcase similarity. Please help.
User avatar
L
CrackverbalGMAT
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7624 [3]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   18 Dec 2019, 00:27
2
Kudos
Kritisood wrote:
I was down to C and E because of POE, but didnt really understand C, hence chose E. After reading C 5 plus times, i still cant understand how it proves that contemporary humans DNA hasnt evolved at all to showcase similarity. Please help.


One good reason to eliminate option E is the fact that E is a blanket statement of sorts ("any two species") and is extreme. Look at the keywords "any similarity" and "must be".

Now, let's look at Option C:
(C) The DNA of prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more similar to that of Neanderthals than is the DNA of contemporary humans.

One of the reasons why C is overlooked is the convoluted language. Once you disentangle the reasoning, it will be easy to see why it is the right answer.

Let’s try paraphrasing option C –
The DNA of the PH ancestors was more similar to the DNA of contemporary humans than it was similar to the Neanderthals. This means that the contemporary human’s DNA was not evolved at all—only then would it be significantly more similar to that of the Homo sapiens (ancestors). Does that help?
avatar
B
Yellkrishna
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2019
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 33 [0]
Given Kudos: 33
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   17 May 2020, 18:33
The conclusion is that the ancestors of humans did not interbreed with Neanderthals.

The reason stated is that the DNA of Neanderthals is significantly different from DNA of humans.

A. While this statement is necessary for the above premise to happen, the conclusion is not dependent on it.

B. This is out of scope.

C. This is a good option. If the DNA of human ancestors is closer to that of the Neanderthals, them the argument fails. Lets keep it.

D. This is out of scope.

E. If the stimulus would have said that the Neanderthal DNA was ‘completely different’ from human DNA instead of ‘significantly different’ then this argument would have held. But now as such, significantly different means that there are some similarities between the two DNAs. Hence, this argument does not hold.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
B
ngochuyen1904
Current Student
Joined: 05 Aug 2019
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: Viet Nam
Schools: Darden '23 (A) Goizueta "23 (A)
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   18 Jul 2020, 20:04
Premise:
The DNA of contemporary humans is significantly different from that of the Neanderthal

Conclusion:
Prehistoric Homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans interbred with Neanderthals

Pre-think:
In order to analyze this argument, we have to assume another thing is that If Homo sapiens are ancestors of contemporary humans, then the DNA of contemporary humans has at least some similarity with DNA of Homo sapiens

So, what if DNA of contemporary humans has more similarity with that of Neanderthal than with that of Homo sapiens?
Now, our conclusion collapses. Since how come contemporary humans whose DNA has more similarity with DNA of Neanderthal but contemporary humans are descendants of Homo sapiens, not of Neanderthal? It’s illogical

That’s exactly what option C is saying
User avatar
VerbalBot
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17206
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink] New post   09 Aug 2023, 02:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
gmatclubot
Re: Anthropologist: It was formerly believed that prehistoric Homo sapiens [#permalink]
09 Aug 2023, 02:16
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
mysterymanrog
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne
Main navigation
GMAT Resources
Partners
MBA Resources
www.gmac.com|www.mba.com | | GMAT Club Rules | Terms and Conditions