Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 144
Location: India

Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 06 Dec 2013, 03:11
Question Stats:
72% (01:07) correct 28% (01:35) wrong based on 128 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 36, 0.72, and 3.005 are terminating decimals. If a, b, c, d and e are integers and p = 2^a*3^b and q = 2^c*3^d*5^e, is p/q a terminating decimal? (1) a > c (2) b > d OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: ifabcdandeareintegersandp2a3bandq2c3d5eispqaterminatingdecimal125789.html
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by humans on 24 May 2009, 05:40.
Last edited by Bunuel on 06 Dec 2013, 03:11, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question and added the OA.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59578

Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Dec 2013, 03:16
hfbamafan wrote: Is another reason A is wrong because 2^c could be 0? 2^c cannot be zero for any value of c. Theory:Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are nonnegative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\). Note that if denominator already has only 2s and/or 5s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not. For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be the terminating decimal. We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced. BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION: If a, b, c, d and e are integers and p = 2^a3^b and q = 2^c3^d5^e, is p/q a terminating decimal?Question: is \(\frac{2^a*3^b}{2^c*3^d*5^e}\) a terminating decimal? The question basically asks whether we cans reduce 3^d in the denominator so to have only powers of 2 and 5 left, which can be rephrased is b (the power of 3 in the nominator) greater than or equal to d (the power of 3 in the denominator): is b>=d? (1) a > c. Not sufficient. (2) b > d. Sufficient. Answer: B. OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: ifabcdandeareintegersandp2a3bandq2c3d5eispqaterminatingdecimal125789.html
_________________




SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 1805

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 May 2009, 13:40
humans wrote: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits is a terminating decimal. For example, 36, 0.72, and 3.005 are terminating decimals. If a, b, c, d and e are integers and p = 2^a*3^b and q = 2^c*3^d*5^e, is p/q a terminating decimal? (1) a > c (2) b > d
Got confused on this one. p/q = (2^a*3^b) / (2^c*3^d*5^e) p/q = 2^(ac) 3^(bd) (1 / 5^e) Its B. (1) a > c is not suff because b and d are unknown. NSF (2) b > d is suff because 2^(ac) and 5^e is always terminating decimal isrrespective of the values of a, c and e. Suff.



Manager
Joined: 14 May 2009
Posts: 166
Schools: Stanford, Harvard, Berkeley, INSEAD

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 May 2009, 23:59
Tricky question.
\(p/q = ((2^a)*(3^b))/((2^c)*(2^d)*(5^e)) = ((2^(ac))*(3^(bd)))/(5^e)\) If \(e>0\), then we have some multiple of 5 in the denominator, and that's ok, it will terminate. Likewise if \(e<=0\) then we have a bunch of 5's up top. If we have a bunch of 2's in the denominator, then it's irrelevant too. The only problem is if we have 3's in the denominator, if we do, it's repeating, if not, it's not repeating. How do we ensure there are no 3's down below? Make sure the exponent on the 3 is positive, or \(bd>0\) or \(b>d\).
Looking at the answer choices, the answer is clearly \(B\).



Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2009
Posts: 219

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 May 2009, 23:10
Nice question. Will add it to my list. Great explainations.



Manager
Joined: 10 Aug 2008
Posts: 58

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 May 2009, 08:01
Good Question !
Only 2 equation satisfy the Condition. Hence Satetment 2 is suff But statemnet 1 is not suff
B



Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 7

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Apr 2011, 23:16
I understand the explanations above. However, I'm also interested in other scenarios. For example, let's say you break a fraction's numerator and denominator down to their prime factorizations and then reduce the original fraction to yield the reduced fraction. Will the presence of any prime numbers, other than 2 and 5, in the denominator of the reduced fraction yield a repeating (i.e. nonterminating) decimal?



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1829

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Apr 2011, 01:05
TheRake wrote: I understand the explanations above. However, I'm also interested in other scenarios. For example, let's say you break a fraction's numerator and denominator down to their prime factorizations and then reduce the original fraction to yield the reduced fraction. Will the presence of any prime numbers, other than 2 and 5, in the denominator of the reduced fraction yield a repeating (i.e. nonterminating) decimal? Yes, that's precisely the rule: if you have reduced your fraction (that step is crucially important), and there's a prime factor of the denominator different from 2 or 5, you'll get a repeating decimal. If 2 and/or 5 are the only prime factors of your denominator, the decimal terminates. It's easier to see why this should be true by thinking of the opposite problem: how you would write a terminating decimal as a fraction. It has to be possible to write any terminating decimal as a fraction with some power of 10 in the denominator  that is, with no primes besides 2 or 5 in the denominator. For example, if you start with 0.056, you can write that as the fraction 56/1000. Now sometimes when you reduce your fraction, some or all of the 2s or 5s might cancel (as they do here: 56/1000 = 7/125 = 7/(5^3) ), but no new prime besides 2 or 5 could ever show up. Conversely, if you start with a reduced fraction and there's some prime besides 2 or 5 in the denominator, there's not going to be any way to rewrite that fraction (by multiplying the top and bottom by the same number) to ever get a power of 10 in the denominator, because that other prime will always be there.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1232
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology

Re: DS  Number System
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Apr 2011, 08:04
The answer is B, because then 3 is always in the numerator, and 2 or 5 can divide this number in a finite manner.
_________________
Formula of Life > Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant) GMAT Club Premium Membership  big benefits and savings



Manager
Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 113
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 2.54
WE: Accounting (Hospitality and Tourism)

Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Dec 2013, 01:47
Is another reason A is wrong because 2^c could be 0?
_________________
4/28 GMATPrep 42Q 36V 640



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59578

Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Dec 2013, 03:16




Re: Any decimal that has only a finite number of nonzero digits
[#permalink]
06 Dec 2013, 03:16






