Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 18:42 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 18:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Raksat
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Last visit: 13 Feb 2025
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
524
 [12]
Given Kudos: 489
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 151
Kudos: 524
 [12]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2025
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
1,095
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1,071
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 231
Kudos: 1,095
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
sdahal
Joined: 27 Nov 2017
Last visit: 08 Aug 2019
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 8
Location: United States (TX)
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.95
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Raksat
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Last visit: 13 Feb 2025
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 489
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 151
Kudos: 524
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sdahal
the assumption made is that if civilizations rely heavily on irrigation then they are bound to collapse. Answer choice B says that whether or not they had relied on irrigation, the particular civilization was going to collapse. This dismantles the assumption, weakening the argument. Answer choice C however, only touches the surface of the argument. So why is the answer C?

This doesn't really relate to whether modern civilizations will collapse as a result of irrigation practices, since it refers to other reasons Sumerian civilization would have collapsed if not for the toxic salt buildup. If anything, it's pushing us in the wrong direction by providing more reasons that a civilization might collapse - it certainly doesn't weaken the argument.
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2025
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,071
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 231
Kudos: 1,095
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Raksat
sdahal
the assumption made is that if civilizations rely heavily on irrigation then they are bound to collapse. Answer choice B says that whether or not they had relied on irrigation, the particular civilization was going to collapse. This dismantles the assumption, weakening the argument. Answer choice C however, only touches the surface of the argument. So why is the answer C?

This doesn't really relate to whether modern civilizations will collapse as a result of irrigation practices, since it refers to other reasons Sumerian civilization would have collapsed if not for the toxic salt buildup. If anything, it's pushing us in the wrong direction by providing more reasons that a civilization might collapse - it certainly doesn't weaken the argument.
Thanks Raksat for the reply!

Yes, the author says that Sumerian civilization collapsed because it relied heavily on irrigation. Choice (B) simply says that if Sumerian civilization had NOT relied heavily on irrigation, it probably would have collapsed eventually. Other factors may have eventually caused its collapse, but those factors didn't cause the collapse. Heavy reliance on irrigation caused the collapse. Thus, the author's argument is not weakened.
avatar
prashant6923
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Last visit: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 52
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
Posts: 69
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why not E?E also weakens the statement.
avatar
rahulswimmer
Joined: 30 Sep 2017
Last visit: 20 Jan 2020
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Posts: 14
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer should be D. Argument , towards its end states that If moderns rely significantly on irrigation , then they will collapse. D states that modern dont rely heavily on irrigation, so they have less chances of collapsing.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
IN2MBB2PE
Joined: 20 Aug 2020
Last visit: 17 Feb 2024
Posts: 130
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 130
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja help needed boss!

How come answer choice C is correct. It says - "Many" - even if it's 90%, the remaining 10% over the years will create built up salts and eventually the civilization will fall, it would make sense if this was "ALL" instead of "MANY". this is why I did not pick this one.

Moreover, what if there are other civilizations where there's only a few farmers using the new technique, what if the MANY is concentrated in one region, that civilization can still fail?

Also What's "MANY" means in these questions?



GMATNinjaTwo
Quote:
Archaeologist : For 2,000 years the ancient Sumerians depended on irrigation to sustain the agriculture that fed their civilization. But eventually irrigation built up in the soil toxic levels of the salts and other impurities left behind when water evaporates. When its soil became unable to support agriculture , Sumerian civilization collapsed. A similar fate is thus likely to befall modern civilizations that continue to rely heavily on irrigation for agriculture.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the archaeologist's argument above?

A. Most modern civilizations could not feed themselves through agriculture without relying heavily on irrigation.
B. Factors unrelated to the use of irrigation would probably have caused Sumerian civilization to collapse sooner or later.
C. Many modern farmers use irrigation techniques that avoid the buildup of salts and other toxic impurities in the soil.
D. Many modern civilizations don't rely to any significant extent on irrigation for agriculture.
E. The soil of ancient Sumerian already contained some toxic salts and other impurities before the Sumerians started using irrigation for agriculture.
rahulswimmer
Answer should be D. Argument , towards its end states that If moderns rely significantly on irrigation , then they will collapse. D states that modern dont rely heavily on irrigation, so they have less chances of collapsing.
The author's conclusion is that "A similar fate is likely to befall modern civilizations that continue to rely heavily on irrigation for agriculture." This conclusion is only concerned with civilizations that rely heavily on irrigation. If they continue to rely heavily on irrigation, then they will likely collapse. The conclusion is not concerned with the "many modern civilizations" that DON'T rely on irrigation, so choice (D) is not relevant to the author's conclusion.

prashant6923
Why not E?E also weakens the statement.
As for choice (E), even though the soil contained some toxic salts, the Sumerians were still able to sustain their agriculture. In other words, the level of toxic salts was not a problem. However, because of heavy irrigation, the toxic salts built up and became a problem.

It's a bit like saying that a man had a heart attack because he ate too much fatty fast-food that clogged his arteries. His arteries may have contained some fats before he started eating the fast food, but the fats were not a problem until he continued to eat fast-food, causing the fats to build up to dangerous levels.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IN2MBB2PE
GMATNinja help needed boss!

How come answer choice C is correct. It says - "Many" - even if it's 90%, the remaining 10% over the years will create built up salts and eventually the civilization will fall, it would make sense if this was "ALL" instead of "MANY". this is why I did not pick this one.

Moreover, what if there are other civilizations where there's only a few farmers using the new technique, what if the MANY is concentrated in one region, that civilization can still fail?

Also What's "MANY" means in these questions?



GMATNinjaTwo
Quote:
Archaeologist : For 2,000 years the ancient Sumerians depended on irrigation to sustain the agriculture that fed their civilization. But eventually irrigation built up in the soil toxic levels of the salts and other impurities left behind when water evaporates. When its soil became unable to support agriculture , Sumerian civilization collapsed. A similar fate is thus likely to befall modern civilizations that continue to rely heavily on irrigation for agriculture.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the archaeologist's argument above?

A. Most modern civilizations could not feed themselves through agriculture without relying heavily on irrigation.
B. Factors unrelated to the use of irrigation would probably have caused Sumerian civilization to collapse sooner or later.
C. Many modern farmers use irrigation techniques that avoid the buildup of salts and other toxic impurities in the soil.
D. Many modern civilizations don't rely to any significant extent on irrigation for agriculture.
E. The soil of ancient Sumerian already contained some toxic salts and other impurities before the Sumerians started using irrigation for agriculture.
rahulswimmer
Answer should be D. Argument , towards its end states that If moderns rely significantly on irrigation , then they will collapse. D states that modern dont rely heavily on irrigation, so they have less chances of collapsing.
The author's conclusion is that "A similar fate is likely to befall modern civilizations that continue to rely heavily on irrigation for agriculture." This conclusion is only concerned with civilizations that rely heavily on irrigation. If they continue to rely heavily on irrigation, then they will likely collapse. The conclusion is not concerned with the "many modern civilizations" that DON'T rely on irrigation, so choice (D) is not relevant to the author's conclusion.

prashant6923
Why not E?E also weakens the statement.
As for choice (E), even though the soil contained some toxic salts, the Sumerians were still able to sustain their agriculture. In other words, the level of toxic salts was not a problem. However, because of heavy irrigation, the toxic salts built up and became a problem.

It's a bit like saying that a man had a heart attack because he ate too much fatty fast-food that clogged his arteries. His arteries may have contained some fats before he started eating the fast food, but the fats were not a problem until he continued to eat fast-food, causing the fats to build up to dangerous levels.
The correct answer choice is the one that "most weakens" the archaeologist's argument. So, we don't need an option that proves that NO modern civilization will EVER experience a similar fate. Instead, we just need the option that weakens the argument more than the other ones do.

The archeologist thinks that modern civilizations that rely on irrigation are likely to collapse because of a build up of toxic salts. (C) tells us that many modern civilizations that rely on irrigation have resolved the toxic salts issue. So, are these societies still likely to collapse for this reason?

They are certainly not as likely to collapse as it seemed before we knew this information. The word "many" in this context just means "a large number" -- so, a large number of modern civilizations have figured out a solution for the toxic salts, and won't suffer the same fate as the Sumerians.

Now, is it possible that some modern civilizations still have an issue with toxic salts, and will collapse? Sure! "Many" doesn't mean "all" -- but again, we don't need to prove that ALL modern, irrigation-based societies will be fine. Instead, we just need to weaken the conclusion that these societies are likely to collapse for this reason.

(C) does exactly that by showing that the salt issue isn't as big of a problem for many modern societies as it was for the Sumerians.

I hope that helps!
avatar
ash720
Joined: 07 Jan 2020
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prashant6923
Why not E?E also weakens the statement.

I was solving the question and end up with C and E. How to choose which one is most correct.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
minalgambhir
Joined: 15 Aug 2020
Last visit: 08 Jun 2024
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 135
Kudos: 53
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CONCLUSION - Modern civilizations that rely heavily on irrigation are likely to fall

GIVEN -

1)Sumerians depended on irrigation
2) Irrigation led to toxic salts development in the soil as a result, the soil became unable to support agriculture
3) Sumerian civilization collapsed

WEAKNER- What new information reduces the belief in the conclusion?

ANSWER CHOICE ANALYSIS -

A) Irrelevant to conclusion
B) Factors unrelated to use of irrigation - not talked in the passage
C) CORRECT
D) Opposing the premise stated in the argument
E) Sumerians are not mentioned in the conclusion
User avatar
shwetank07
Joined: 22 May 2018
Last visit: 11 Dec 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 476
GPA: 3.88
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
weaken : toxicity ain't happening --> soil will not be damaged --> irrigation and agriculture all fine --> modern civilization wont collapse !

A. Most modern civilizations could not feed themselves through agriculture without relying heavily on irrigation : NOT CONCLUSIVE
B. Factors unrelated to the use of irrigation would probably have caused Sumerian civilization to collapse sooner or later : OUT OF SCOPE
C. Many modern farmers use irrigation techniques that avoid the buildup of salts and other toxic impurities in the soil : CORRECT
D. Many modern civilizations don't rely to any significant extent on irrigation for agriculture : IRRELEVANT
E. The soil of ancient Sumerian already contained some toxic salts and other impurities before the Sumerians started using irrigation for agriculture : OUT OF SCOPE
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts