It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 14:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Dallas Texas
Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2004, 09:08
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.

Which of the following hypotheses is best supported by the evidence above?

(A) The lower layer contains the remains of the city where the siege took place.
(B) The legend confuses stories from two different historical periods.
(C) The middle layer does not represent the period of the siege.
(D) The siege lasted for a long time before the city was destroyed
(E) The pottery of type 3 was imported to the city by traders.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2004, 09:15
C, None of the other choices can be understood from the passage..

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 842

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2004, 09:19
Agree with Bhai on this (C) should be it.

All other options are way out of scope

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2004, 09:34
wow, I was really stuck between C and D. C it is as D cannot indeed be inferred.
A) what if they were not even digging at the right spot?
B) out of scope
D) the siege could have lasted 1 day, we can't infer this
E) out of scope
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

02 Jul 2004, 02:43
(C) is the answer, even though (C) is marginal, but (C) is the only statement which can be somehow inferred from the passage, all the other statements cannot be even marginally inferred.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

02 Jul 2004, 02:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by