Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:00 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:00
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jasonfodor
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Last visit: 23 Aug 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
16
Given Kudos: 4
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 30
Kudos: 16
are you suppose to ignore caluses set off in commas? 19 Oct 2017, 16:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kind of something learned throughout grade school: you can ignore clauses set off in commas.

BUT

I saw this sentence in a Manhattan test prep book:

To get to his house, Jim biked along an old dirt road, which cut through the woods.

The example is used to show "to get to his house" refers to Jim and "which cut through the woods" modifies road and all that makes sense. However if you take out the clause between the commas it reads: To get to his house which cut through the woods. Doesn't make sense although the sentence is considered correct.

So can you ignore what's set in commas?

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
avatar
cxa0897
avatar
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 15 May 2017
Last visit: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 206
Own Kudos:
99
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 206
Kudos: 99
are you suppose to ignore caluses set off in commas? 19 Oct 2017, 17:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jasonfodor
kind of something learned throughout grade school: you can ignore clauses set off in commas.

BUT

I saw this sentence in a Manhattan test prep book:

To get to his house, Jim biked along an old dirt road, which cut through the woods.

The example is used to show "to get to his house" refers to Jim and "which cut through the woods" modifies road and all that makes sense. However if you take out the clause between the commas it reads: To get to his house which cut through the woods. Doesn't make sense although the sentence is considered correct.

So can you ignore what's set in commas?
Show more

You can not ignore the part in the comma here, and there are no rules regarding this that I'm aware of. Basically, take anything you learned in school or through conversation and evaluate with a grain of salt. Gmat english is a different ball game.

If there is anything we can ignore in this sentence, it is the part after the comma, though you would still need to be aware of tense if it were a SC question. Anything that starts with "which" is usually able to be removed without impacting the meaning of the sentence. Not always, but generally.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
are you suppose to ignore caluses set off in commas? 21 Oct 2017, 19:07
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jasonfodor
kind of something learned throughout grade school: you can ignore clauses set off in commas.

BUT

I saw this sentence in a Manhattan test prep book:

To get to his house, Jim biked along an old dirt road, which cut through the woods.

The example is used to show "to get to his house" refers to Jim and "which cut through the woods" modifies road and all that makes sense. However if you take out the clause between the commas it reads: To get to his house which cut through the woods. Doesn't make sense although the sentence is considered correct.

So can you ignore what's set in commas?
Show more
The error(s) in an SC question can be anywhere, so it's not a good idea to condition yourself to skip any part of the sentence automatically.
User avatar
ss3617
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2017
Last visit: 21 Jun 2019
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
61
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V40
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 115
Kudos: 61
are you suppose to ignore caluses set off in commas? 22 Oct 2017, 05:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You cannot ignore in all the cases. You need to take a subjective call. Understanding meaning of the sentence will be more important. You will start getting better as you practice.
User avatar
ccooley
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Last visit: 06 Jun 2020
Posts: 931
Own Kudos:
1,642
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 931
Kudos: 1,642
are you suppose to ignore caluses set off in commas? 08 Nov 2017, 12:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jasonfodor
kind of something learned throughout grade school: you can ignore clauses set off in commas.

BUT

I saw this sentence in a Manhattan test prep book:

To get to his house, Jim biked along an old dirt road, which cut through the woods.

The example is used to show "to get to his house" refers to Jim and "which cut through the woods" modifies road and all that makes sense. However if you take out the clause between the commas it reads: To get to his house which cut through the woods. Doesn't make sense although the sentence is considered correct.

So can you ignore what's set in commas?
Show more

This is a very interesting topic to bring up! There is a GMAT grammar rule that relates to this, but it's more complex than what you've described here. I'll just say what it is first, and then explain it:

When you're trying to find the main subject and verb of a sentence or clause, you can ignore modifiers.

Okay, why would you want to find the main subject and verb? There are two reasons. One, you might be trying to see whether the subject and verb agree in number. Here's a pair of example sentences:

University employees, who are frustrated with the limited local options available after the closing of the cafeteria on campus, is requesting a longer lunch break.
University employees, who are frustrated with the limited local options available after the closing of the cafeteria on campus, are requesting a longer lunch break.

You might see a split like this one on the GMAT: one sentence includes the singular verb 'is,' while the other includes the plural verb 'are.' Since 'is' or 'are' is the main verb in this sentence, you'll need to find the main subject and determine whether it's singular or plural. To do so, you can ignore the lengthy modifier between the commas. However, you don't ignore it just because it's between the commas! You ignore it because it's a modifier. Sometimes, modifiers occur between two commas. At other times, modifiers occur at the beginning of a sentence, or at the end of a sentence, or without any commas at all.

In your sentence, there are two modifiers. One is at the beginning of the sentence, and the other is at the end. If you wanted to find the main subject and verb of the sentence, you could ignore those modifiers.

To get to his house, Jim biked along an old dirt road,which cut through the woods.

By the way, how do you know that those two parts of the sentence are modifiers? The first one starts with the preposition 'to,' and the second one starts with the relative pronoun 'which.' The bit in the middle, which has no 'modifier markers,' is actually the main body of the sentence. The main subject is 'Jim' and the main verb is 'biked.'

Two, you might cross off modifiers if you were wondering whether the core structure of the sentence was correct. For example, here's a sentence with a bad core:

The boys, who enjoyed playing with action figures, which they purchased at the dollar store.

If we start crossing off modifiers, we end up with a very short 'sentence':

The boys, who enjoyed playing with action figures,which they purchased at the dollar store.

'The boys' isn't a complete sentence by itself, so we know that the overall sentence must be incorrect.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
miag
189 posts
u1983
Current Student
710 posts
MikeScarn
Current Student
275 posts