Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:09 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:09
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Strengthen|                                    
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,476
Own Kudos:
5,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,476
Kudos: 5,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AnishPassi
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
661
 [4]
Given Kudos: 18
Status:GMAT Coach
Affiliations: The GMAT Co.
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Posts: 112
Kudos: 661
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Story

Art restorers who have been studying the factors that cause Renaissance oil paintings to deteriorate physically when subject to climatic changes have found that the oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to these changes well.

This one is a fairly long sentence. Let’s make sure we understand what’s going on here.

Renaissance oil paintings deteriorate physically under climatic changes.

Certain art restorers have been studying the factors that cause such deterioration.

These art restorers have found that the oil paint used in these paintings does not deteriorate.
(So probably the deterioration is caused by something else.)

The restorers therefore hypothesize that it is a layer of material called gesso, which is under the paint, that causes the deterioration.

Oil paintings have a layer of a material called gesso under the paint. The restorers claim that the deterioration is caused by this layer of gesso.

Why is the word ‘therefore’ used in this statement?

This sentence is based on the previous one.

Essentially: Since the oil paint adjusts to the climatic changes, this other material must be responsible for the deterioration of oil paintings.


Question Stem


Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the restorers’ hypothesis?

Framework: The correct answer choice should lead me to believe even more that the oil paintings deteriorate under climatic changes because of the layer of gesso.

This could happen by eliminating other possible reasons, or by highlighting something about the layer of gesso that makes it the more likely culprit. There could be other ways too. These are what I can think of.

Let’s get into the options.


Answer choice analysis


(A) Renaissance oil paintings with a thin layer of gesso are less likely to show deterioration in response to climatic changes than those with a thicker layer.
Correct.
What impact do you think the following variation has on the hypothesis:

A’. Renaissance oil paintings with a thin layer of gesso are EQUALLY LIKELY to show deterioration in response to climatic changes than those with a thicker layer.

If the chance of a painting deteriorating is not impacted by the amount of gesso in oil paintings, I’m inclined to believe that the gesso layer is not the culprit.

On the flip side, the original answer choice tells us that thinner the layer of gesso, lower the chance that the oil painting is deteriorated.

i.e., ↓ gesso —> ↓ chance of deterioration

This does make me believe more that it is the gesso layer that causes the deterioration.

(B) Renaissance oil paintings are often painted on wooden panels, which swell when humidity increases and contract when it declines.
Incorrect.
    1. Humidity is a climatic condition. So I won’t straight away decide that the answer choice is irrelevant.
    2. How would the expansion and contraction of the panel on which the painting is made impact the painting?

I imagine such recurring expansion and contraction of the panel would negatively impact the painting.

By giving an alternate potential reason, this answer choice weakens the hypothesis.

(C) Oil paint expands and contracts readily in response to changes in temperature, but it absorbs little water and so is little affected by changes in humidity.
Incorrect.
We are already given in the passage that “the oil paint used in these paintings actually adjusts to [climatic] changes well”. So, how exactly oil paint physically changes under climatic changes is irrelevant.
No impact.

(D) An especially hard and nonabsorbent type of gesso was the raw material for moldings on the frames of Renaissance oil paintings.
Incorrect.
So the frames also have a form of gesso in them. And that type of gesso is hard and nonabsorbent. Even if we take ‘hard and nonabsorbent’ to be qualities that prevent deterioration from climatic changes, we have no information about the type of gesso used in the layer under the paint. Remember, the hypothesis is that the layer of gesso, which is under the paint, causes the deterioration.

No impact.

(E) Gesso layers applied by Renaissance painters typically consisted of a coarse base layer onto which several increasingly fine-grained layers were applied.
Incorrect.
This answer choice is about how the gesso layers were applied. That on its own does not help me understand whether the layer of gesso was responsible for the deterioration.

No impact.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ankita1122


Yeah, I can't see why this would be tempting, except as a distraction. Maybe the exact thoughts you and I went through now ("Why on Earth would this matter?") can slow someone down enough to make this question harder overall. But not every answer choice is going to be tempting. Some of them are quite out there!
User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
Ankita1122


Yeah, I can't see why this would be tempting, except as a distraction. Maybe the exact thoughts you and I went through now ("Why on Earth would this matter?") can slow someone down enough to make this question harder overall. But not every answer choice is going to be tempting. Some of them are quite out there!

Hi DmitryFarber -

Regarding (d) -- can we assume that 'hard and nonabsorbent' are qualities for "adjusting for climatic changes well" ? If we could, i think option (D) would strengthen the hypothesis and would be an answer, right ?

Reason -
If the hypothesis is (X) is causing (Y). Then one way to strengthen this hypothesis is to eliminate other potential causes for (Y).

If 'hard and nonabsorbent' are qualities for "adjusting for climatic changes well" - then (Option D) would be eliminating ANOTHER POTENTIAL CAUSE for deterioration.

Specifically - option D would be eliminating this cause : Gesso, found under frames, CANNOT BE held responsible for deterioration.

Thereby, strengthening the hypothesis - Gesso, under the painting specifically, MORE LIKELY is the cause of deterioration (given oil nor gesso under the frames are the cause behind deterioration)

Thoughts ?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta2

Generally, the answer to "Can we assume X?" is no. Unless something is a basic idea that everyone knows, then it can't be used as underlying knowledge. In this case, I have no idea if those qualities are helpful, and even if they were, knowing the specific properties of the gesso in the frame wouldn't tell us anything about the gesso in the paintings.
User avatar
stackskillz
Joined: 28 Feb 2022
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 165
Posts: 62
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conc: The restorers therefore hypothesize that it is a layer of material called gesso, which is under the paint, that causes the deterioration.

(A) Renaissance oil paintings with a thin layer of gesso are less likely to show deterioration in response to climatic changes than those with a thicker layer. - This shows that changing the amount of gesso changes the liklihood of deterioration. Therefore, this supports the passage. Keep

(B) Renaissance oil paintings are often painted on wooden panels, which swell when humidity increases and contract when it declines. - Doesn't explain the connection of gesso with deterioration. Drop

(C) Oil paint expands and contracts readily in response to changes in temperature, but it absorbs little water and so is little affected by changes in humidity. - Again, the passage establishes that the oil pain adjusts to climate changes and gesso is hypothesized as the cause of deterioration. This option doesn't provide any support for the conclusion. Drop

(D) An especially hard and nonabsorbent type of gesso was the raw material for moldings on the frames of Renaissance oil paintings. - Explains what gesso can be used for, but not why it causes deterioration. Drop

(E) Gesso layers applied by Renaissance painters typically consisted of a coarse base layer onto which several increasingly fine-grained layers were applied. - Explains what gesso consists of. Drop
User avatar
ImpactGMAT
Joined: 10 Sep 2020
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Posts: 8
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to see option which talks about quality of Gesso is responsible for painting to deteriorate so option A is answer. 

While option D & E just said Gesso is used in renaissance painting but had no clue that it is reason for deterioration of paintings­
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts