Oct 22 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join to learn strategies for tackling the longest, wordiest examples of Counting, Sets, & Series GMAT questions Oct 22 09:00 AM PDT  10:00 AM PDT Watch & learn the Do's and Don’ts for your upcoming interview Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions) Oct 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join an exclusive interview with the people behind the test. If you're taking the GMAT, this is a webinar you cannot afford to miss! Oct 26 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Want to score 90 percentile or higher on GMAT CR? Attend this free webinar to learn how to prethink assumptions and solve the most challenging questions in less than 2 minutes. Oct 27 07:00 AM EDT  09:00 AM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Pushing Hard
Affiliations: GNGO2, SSCRB
Joined: 30 Sep 2012
Posts: 74
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.33
WE: Analyst (Health Care)

As part of a certain game in which a computer generated a ra
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 25 Oct 2013, 14:24
Question Stats:
66% (01:50) correct 34% (02:03) wrong based on 85 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
As part of a certain game in which a computer generated a random number several times, 6 more numbers greater than 0 resulted than numbers less than 0. 0 never resulted. How many times was the result greater than zero? (1) 2 more numbers greater than 1 resulted than numbers less than 1. (2) The sum of all the numbers that resulted was 3.75.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
If you don’t make mistakes, you’re not working hard. And Now that’s a Huge mistake.
Originally posted by manishuol on 29 Apr 2013, 12:09.
Last edited by Bunuel on 25 Oct 2013, 14:24, edited 1 time in total.
RENAMED THE TOPIC.



Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Posts: 51
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)

Re: Computer generated a random number
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 May 2013, 05:00
Option E.
For every Six positive numbers the computer generates, it will generate a negative number. ( 6 more numbers greater than 0 resulted than numbers less than 0). And 0 is never resulted.
so in a set of 7 numbers the computer generates, there are 6 positive numbers and 1 negative number.
from statement 1: for every 2 numbers greater than 1, it generates a number less than 1. but this doesn't give info about how many times the game is played, hence we cannot determine how many times the numbers generated are >0. insufficient.
from stmt 2: sum of all the number is 3.75. clearly insufficient.
1+2 , again doesnt give any additonal info regarding the number of time the game is played or the values it generated that result in 3.75. so both combined as well insufficient.
hope it is clear.



Senior Manager
Status: 1,750 Q's attempted and counting
Affiliations: University of Florida
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 475
Location: United States (FL)
GMAT 1: 600 Q45 V29 GMAT 2: 590 Q35 V35 GMAT 3: 570 Q42 V28 GMAT 4: 610 Q44 V30
GPA: 3.45
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

Re: Computer generated a random number
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Oct 2013, 14:15
Official Explanation from GMAT Hacks
Answer: E The question splits the random numbers into two groups. There are p positive numbers and n negative numbers, and p = n + 6.
Statement (1) is sufficient. This also splits the numbers into two groups, but not the same groups. We can use the information to deduce how many more numbers are greater than zero than greater than one, but because we've only been given differences up to this point, we can't find the actual total. For instance, if there are 10 positive numbers, there are 4 negatives. With a total of 14, that would be 8 greater than 1 and 6 less than 1.
That scenario works, but the differences will remain the same if you add 10 to each number: 20 positives, 14 negatives, 18 greater than 1, and 16 less than 1.
Statement (2) is also insufficient. We know nothing specific about the numbers beyond their range. The answer would be much different if the numbers were closely bunched around 0 and 1 (say, 0.01 or 1.03) than if they were spread further out (say, 3 and 5).
Taken together, we still don't have enough information. Given a set of numbers that consists of a mix of positives and negatives, you can simplify the matter by assuming that many of them could cancel out. For instance, if there are 10 positives and 4 negatives, you could say that 4 of the positives are each 2 and 4 of the negatives are each 2. (That's a sum of 0.) Then you only have to consider the sum of the 6 remaining numbers, not the group of 14 as a whole. It's too timeconsuming to work out a pair of contradictory examples, but since we don't know anything about the size of the numbers, we could construct many different sets that fit the requirements that sum to 3.75. Choice (E) is correct.



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13383

Re: As part of a certain game in which a computer generated a ra
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Apr 2019, 19:04
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: As part of a certain game in which a computer generated a ra
[#permalink]
11 Apr 2019, 19:04






