GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Jun 2018, 07:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Assize courts differ from other French courts because they

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2005
Posts: 89
Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 12 Sep 2013, 23:31
3
19
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

53% (01:02) correct 47% (01:12) wrong based on 1037 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.
A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges

Originally posted by ngobaotrung on 15 May 2005, 04:24.
Last edited by fameatop on 12 Sep 2013, 23:31, edited 1 time in total.
OA added & Tagged
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 233
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2005, 04:54
E.

The use of because doesnt seem appropriate. Also D is wrong because it is unnecessarily wordy
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 531
Location: Canuckland
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2005, 12:43
My choice is B,

I didn't go for E because the second clause doesn't clearly show what exactly is the difference. But I may be wrong.

Can anyone explain why 'additionally' in the original is wrong? It sounds weird there, but what't the rule?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 824
Location: Hyderabad
Re: SC-Assize [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2005, 12:59
ngobaotrung wrote:
173.Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.


A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges


they has no clear antecedent - choose D

but then, "composition is of" is incorrect! will go with E
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1102
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2005, 03:19
B or E ? :?

B for me
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1102
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2005, 07:14
Can someone please explain me why B is wrong ?

we can not say "X differs from Y because" or there is another reason ?
4 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 333
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2014, 08:32
4
4
ngobaotrung wrote:
Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.
A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges


Antmavel wrote:
Can someone please explain me why B is wrong ?

we can not say "X differs from Y because" or there is another reason ?


B is wrong because this is'nt a cause- and- effect relationship...because means " literal" cause and effect......


LETS CHECK IT HERE
-- has - " being composed of " caused the difference ? NO !!!!!
It is better to use a qualifier " in that ---- it means " being composed of ......" is the only certain way in which the two courts differ......

JACK DIFFERS FROM JILL BECAUSE JACK IS MORE INTELLIGENT....... WRONG
JACK DIFFERS FROM JILL IN THAT JACK IS MORE INTELLIGENT....... RIGHT



ANS IS "E"........


KUDOS IF YOU PLEASE.......
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2012
Posts: 7
Location: United States
Twilight: Sparkle
Concentration: Accounting, Economics
GPA: 3.85
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2014, 17:01
I think differ ....... in that is more idiomatic than differ because . I am just guessing btw
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 333
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2014, 07:25
semwal wrote:
ngobaotrung wrote:
Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.
A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges


Antmavel wrote:
Can someone please explain me why B is wrong ?

we can not say "X differs from Y because" or there is another reason ?


B is wrong because this is'nt a cause- and- effect relationship...because means " literal" cause and effect......


LETS CHECK IT HERE
-- has - " being composed of " caused the difference ? NO !!!!!
It is better to use a qualifier " in that ---- it means " being composed of ......" is the only certain way in which the two courts differ......

JACK DIFFERS FROM JILL BECAUSE JACK IS MORE INTELLIGENT....... WRONG
JACK DIFFERS FROM JILL IN THAT JACK IS MORE INTELLIGENT....... RIGHT



ANS IS "E"........


KUDOS IF YOU PLEASE.......


MAY I REQUEST EXPERTS TO CHECK AND CONFIRM IF ABOVE ASSESSMENT IS CORRECT............THANKS IN ADVANCE.......
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 135
Location: India
Dheeraj: Madaraboina
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2014, 07:53
1
3
semwal wrote:
semwal wrote:
ngobaotrung wrote:
Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.
A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges


Antmavel wrote:
Can someone please explain me why B is wrong ?

we can not say "X differs from Y because" or there is another reason ?


B is wrong because this is'nt a cause- and- effect relationship...because means " literal" cause and effect......


LETS CHECK IT HERE
-- has - " being composed of " caused the difference ? NO !!!!!
It is better to use a qualifier " in that ---- it means " being composed of ......" is the only certain way in which the two courts differ......

JACK DIFFERS FROM JILL BECAUSE JACK IS MORE INTELLIGENT....... WRONG
JACK DIFFERS FROM JILL IN THAT JACK IS MORE INTELLIGENT....... RIGHT



ANS IS "E"........


KUDOS IF YOU PLEASE.......


MAY I REQUEST EXPERTS TO CHECK AND CONFIRM IF ABOVE ASSESSMENT IS CORRECT............THANKS IN ADVANCE.......



whenever i see the word "because" i substitute the word "caused by" in place of "because" and check whether the meaning conveyed is same or if sentence changes the meaning.

By the above rule we can eliminate A,B,C.
Between D and E, composed is better than composition .
Hence E .
Hope this helps .
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Jun 2014
Posts: 46
GPA: 3.6
WE: Operations (Energy and Utilities)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2015, 00:16
another reason to eliminate D.
In D their is a possessive pronoun which has no predecessor.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 241
GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2015, 22:19
1
1
"And also" is one the many redundancies. This eliminates B and C.

'In that' and 'because' are both correct usages for giving a reason. In fact, A would have been correct had the word 'additionally' not been there. So eliminate A.

D vs E
GMAT prefers verb to nouns. (Of course not at a cost of meaning and diction)

This helps eliminate D


Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.
A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally additionally is redundant here
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges and also is redundant
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges and also is redundant
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges verb vs noun - go for the verb if the meaning is not disturbed
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges correct form
_________________

Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Nov 2015
Posts: 78
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2016, 10:19
A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2016
Posts: 17
Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2016, 23:31
here is the explanation

A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
this is wrong because before coming it is having additionally, as coming is the modifier so here it is modifying additionally
which is wrong .Hence this is wrong

B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
and also in not used together. Incorrect

C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
same reason as B . Incorrect

D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
here they have converted verb to noun, composed to composition , this is not the correct form. Incorrect

E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges
we are left with answer choice E

Please let me know , if I am wrong ! :roll:
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 179
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Tuck
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2017, 09:28
Could anyone explain the options in detail? why 'and also' is redundant?
i was stuck between C and E.

what first 'They" refers to here?

it should refer to the nearest noun right ? since all the options have they, we can ignore it.
Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3200
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2017, 11:41
brs1cob wrote:
Could anyone explain the options in detail? why 'and also' is redundant?
i was stuck between C and E.

what first 'They" refers to here?

it should refer to the nearest noun right ? since all the options have they, we can ignore it.


"And" implies more than one thing - so does "also". Therefore together the usage is redundant.

No, a pronoun does not necessarily refer to the nearest noun.

If a pronoun that is the subject of a clause has two possible antecedents, one of which is the subject of another clause within the sentence, the pronoun would, by virtue of parallelism, unambiguously refer to the subject antecedent.
Thus "they" refers to "Assize courts".
Expert Post
Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2017, 11:47
Top Contributor
Assize courts differ from other French courts because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally coming from either that court or one sitting with nine jurors - ordinary citizens whose names are drawn by lot from the electoral rolls.

A. because they are composed of a presiding judge and two judges additionally
B. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also two other judges
C. because they are composed of a presiding judge and also of two other judges
D. in that their composition is of a presiding judge and two other judges
E. in that they are composed of a presiding judge and two other judges

A, B and C are wrong not for the use of "and also" alone. Primarily they are incorrect due to the wrong use of "because" to describe an extant state through a causal state. "And also" or "and additionally" are at least stylistically unneeded verbiage since the sentence can do even without the "also" or "additionally".

However, we cannot ignore the reference for the word 'they' or 'their that easily because it happens to be there in all the choices. That 'they' may refer to the proximate noun cannot be vouched for since the other contention that a pronoun first refers to the subject rather than an object of a preposition is also strong. This question leaves a lot of ambiguity.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Re: Assize courts differ from other French courts because they   [#permalink] 14 Mar 2017, 11:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Assize courts differ from other French courts because they

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.