Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:44 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:44
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Abhijit199311
Joined: 13 Oct 2019
Last visit: 28 Jan 2021
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 128
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,783
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
However, according to https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... 71-30.html, Ron mentioned that WITH + N-Ving also expresses an action happening AT THE SAME TIME as the main action as well.
Quote:

When you use "with + xxx + ___ing", the idea is that you're talking about simultaneity.

So, my question is why "the last year" is considered concurrent with "now"?

OA : WITH the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are now using...
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
427
 [1]
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 427
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn

However, my understanding is that WITH + N-Ving also expresses an action happening AT THE SAME TIME as the main action as well.
OA : WITH the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are now using...

So, why "the last year" is considered concurrent with "now"?

Your understanding is fairly restrictive, and I'm not sure if I would fully endorse it.

But in any event, these things that have happened "in the last year" are continuing to happen -- the cost is still plummeting, and the service is still becoming more common. If you read "with + active participle" in this manner, then this is exactly how you should understand this modifier.
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear AnthonyRitz,
AnthonyRitz

But in any event, these things that have happened "in the last year" are continuing to happen -- the cost is still plummeting, and the service is still becoming more common. If you read "with + active participle" in this manner, then this is exactly how you should understand this modifier.
I agree with you above.
But then we have no solid reasons to reject choice E. because WHILE clause and the MAIN clause are both happening at the same time, right?

Mitch said those 2 clauses are not concurrent. I'm confused here.
Quote:
A while-modifier must serve to express an action happening AT THE SAME TIME as the main action.
E: While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year, many people are now using
Here, the red portion happened IN THE LAST YEAR, whereas the blue portion is happening NOW.
Since the while-modifier does not serve to express an action happening at the same time as the main action, eliminate E.
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
427
 [2]
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 427
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn
Dear AnthonyRitz,
AnthonyRitz

But in any event, these things that have happened "in the last year" are continuing to happen -- the cost is still plummeting, and the service is still becoming more common. If you read "with + active participle" in this manner, then this is exactly how you should understand this modifier.
I agree with you above.
But then we have no solid reasons to reject choice E. because WHILE clause and the MAIN clause are both happening at the same time, right?

Mitch said those 2 clauses are not concurrent. I'm confused here.
Quote:
A while-modifier must serve to express an action happening AT THE SAME TIME as the main action.
E: While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year, many people are now using
Here, the red portion happened IN THE LAST YEAR, whereas the blue portion is happening NOW.
Since the while-modifier does not serve to express an action happening at the same time as the main action, eliminate E.

Something that has gone on for the past year is not "while" something is happening strictly now. But it is ongoing into the present. You're comparing two structures that are not equally burdensome in their requirements. I did suggest above that your understanding of "with + active participle" seems a bit too restrictive to me. Ongoing into the present seems fine there. But it doesn't work to say something going on over the past year is/was "while" something is happening just now.

As a bonus, this "while" could be read as "although," creating ambiguity and further illogic (these are not contrasting ideas).
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,986
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,986
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I read "while" in E to mean "although", and not "at the same that", in part because "while" in E replaces "because" in A, so I expect each answer to somehow express a logical connection between the first clause and the second. The verb tenses in E also make that the only reasonable way to interpret "while". Then E becomes wrong because it makes no sense -- it doesn't make sense to say "although phones are cheaper, people are making more calls". You'd want to say something that means the opposite, something more like "because phones are cheaper, people are making more calls".

This amplifies the point Anthony made above, that learning specific rules is often a really restrictive way to approach SC. Simple English words like "while" almost always have multiple uses and multiple meanings. "While" can mean "at the same time as", and then naturally you'd normally (though not always) need matching verb tenses, because you usually need matching verb tenses when two things are happening simultaneously. But "while" has other meanings, and when it means "although" or "whereas", you do not need matching verb tenses. The point is, there's no English "rule" about the verb tenses you can use with the word "while". We choose our verb tenses because of the meaning we're trying to convey. "While" sometimes requires matching verb tenses because it sometimes means two things are happening at the same time.
avatar
DwightSchrute
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Dec 2018
Last visit: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.8
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 34
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
is the usage of "with" in D correct?

With the Sales declining, CEO announced...
This is wrong usage of with sales declining is a separate event and the ceo has nothing to do with it.
Similarly in choice D, the cost of wireless is a separate event and many people have nothing to do with it.

If someone could help.
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 427
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DwightSchrute
is the usage of "with" in D correct?

With the Sales declining, CEO announced...
This is wrong usage of with sales declining is a separate event and the ceo has nothing to do with it.
Similarly in choice D, the cost of wireless is a separate event and many people have nothing to do with it.

If someone could help.

I don't think either of these is wrong. Who says I cannot say, "With sales declining, the CEO announced..."?
avatar
DwightSchrute
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Dec 2018
Last visit: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.8
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Posts: 34
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnthonyRitz
DwightSchrute
is the usage of "with" in D correct?

With the Sales declining, CEO announced...
This is wrong usage of with sales declining is a separate event and the ceo has nothing to do with it.
Similarly in choice D, the cost of wireless is a separate event and many people have nothing to do with it.

If someone could help.

I don't think either of these is wrong. Who says I cannot say, "With sales declining, the CEO announced..."?

I am not quiet sure but from what I could read about the usage of with, the doer has to be the same for both actions.

https://magoosh.com/gmat/verbal/sentenc ... orrection/

Here is another question in which the usage of with is wrong because the doer of the with action is different, as explained by senior gmatclub members,
https://gmatclub.com/forum/with-the-mud ... l#p1665019

I would love to be corrected and finally know how to go about the usages of with.
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 427
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DwightSchrute
AnthonyRitz
DwightSchrute
is the usage of "with" in D correct?

With the Sales declining, CEO announced...
This is wrong usage of with sales declining is a separate event and the ceo has nothing to do with it.
Similarly in choice D, the cost of wireless is a separate event and many people have nothing to do with it.

If someone could help.

I don't think either of these is wrong. Who says I cannot say, "With sales declining, the CEO announced..."?

I am not quiet sure but from what I could read about the usage of with, the doer has to be the same for both actions.

https://magoosh.com/gmat/verbal/sentenc ... orrection/

Here is another question in which the usage of with is wrong because the doer of the with action is different, as explained by senior gmatclub members,
https://gmatclub.com/forum/with-the-mud ... l#p1665019

I would love to be corrected and finally know how to go about the usages of with.

Ah, I see. I don't fully agree with the rationale of Mike's post, even though I respect Mike a ton. The "with" modifier certainly requires a degree of logical relation, but I don't think you can fully rely on a "same actor" rule, and this official question pretty well establishes my point on the matter.

Here's another example regarded as correct by the New York Times:

"With the prevalence of fierce bidding wars for apartments in Manhattan, homes that get poached within a day of the open house, and interest rates that keep inching up, a buyer could become so frustrated by hunting for real estate in the [area] that he or she might just decide to give up."

As for the sentence in question in this thread, "many people" could, in some loose sense, "have" plummeting wireless service costs and increasingly common mobile phones. That's good enough for me.
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.

(D) With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are

(E) While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year and mobile phones are increasingly common, many people are
I choose E because:
As the cost is reducing and mobile phones are becoming common, people are using more and more calls .
It indicates action can happen simultaneously in loose sense, so presence of while is not un-justified
Grammatically also I didn’t find any issue , while IC, IC(independent clause)

D. I rejected D
When I read ,it sounds like:
many people are now using their mobile phones, With the cost of wireless service plummeting xx
it sounds horrible to me as people are not using mobile with cost of wirless plumeeting xx
so I rejected D


Could you please advise whats wrong if we assume: while ( happening at same time duration ) and with ( with the cost) as explained above.

Thanks!

AndrewN EMPOWERgmatVerbal AjiteshArun GMATNinja
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imSKR
Could you please advise . it was my natural thought process to reach at an answer but later found it wrong. Could you please advise what did I miss for this line of reasoning.
Hi imSKR,

I don't think I've understood your question, but we can take option E out because it appears to be introducing a contrast (while X, Y). That is not the intended meaning of the sentence.
User avatar
mSKR
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Last visit: 10 Mar 2024
Posts: 1,290
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
Posts: 1,290
Kudos: 938
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AjiteshArun
imSKR
Could you please advise . it was my natural thought process to reach at an answer but later found it wrong. Could you please advise what did I miss for this line of reasoning.
Hi imSKR,

I don't think I've understood your question, but we can take option E out because it appears to be introducing a contrast (while X, Y). That is not the intended meaning of the sentence.


i edited the question for better clarity.
Question1: why do not we take while happening at same time rather than contrast in E
Question2: Why do we not take meaning as: with xx, many people using ( sounds wrong that many people using mobile phones, with the cost xx) in D

Thanks!
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imSKR
AjiteshArun
imSKR
Could you please advise . it was my natural thought process to reach at an answer but later found it wrong. Could you please advise what did I miss for this line of reasoning.
Hi imSKR,

I don't think I've understood your question, but we can take option E out because it appears to be introducing a contrast (while X, Y). That is not the intended meaning of the sentence.


i edited the question for better clarity.
Question1: why do not we take while happening at same time rather than contrast in E
Question2: Why do we not take meaning as: with xx, many people using ( sounds wrong that many people using mobile phones, with the cost xx) in D

Thanks!
Hello, imSKR. There are two issues with interpreting while in choice (E) as as, the first of which AjiteshArun has already pointed out: there is no way you can disprove the reading that while indicates a contrast instead. The second is more subtle, but even if you replace while with as, you can still see that a second verb is missing in the latter portion of the sentence that would qualify it as a parallel element to the first:

As the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year and mobile phones are increasingly common, many people are...

Tease out what this as is saying: 1) As the cost has plummeted and 2) as mobile phones are common. What? The second as reads more like a since. We need to insert another verb for the second part to work: as mobile phones are growing increasingly common. Now the second part better fits our interpretation.

With all of this said, the first point above, that while can be interpreted as although, still holds. The point of this exercise was to show you that even if you choose to interpret while as as, you still have a problem.

I hope that helps. Thank you for calling my attention to the question.

- Andrew
User avatar
Vivek1707
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi could someone explain how is the parallelism working in option D
I eliminated D cause I felt that "Mobile phones becoming" is not parallels to "cost of service plummeting".
Would request some expert to help me understand what am I missing
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Vivek1707
Hi could someone explain how is the parallelism working in option D
I eliminated D cause I felt that "Mobile phones becoming" is not parallels to "cost of service plummeting".
Would request some expert to help me understand what am I missing
What's happening to the cost of wireless service? It is plummeting

What's happening to mobile phones? They are becoming increasingly common.

So, these phrases are indeed parallel Vivek. What specific doubt do you have?
avatar
aarkay87
Joined: 14 May 2020
Last visit: 29 Jan 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 180
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
Posts: 121
Kudos: 49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mikemcgarry sir,

Tagging you for further guidance on OA - D; As per one of your articles, structure with + [noun] + [participle] can be tested if the sentence makes sense without the participle phrase, just “with” + [noun].

Link: https://magoosh.com/gmat/with-noun-part ... orrection/

After removing participle in the OA, the sentence will become: With the cost of wireless service and mobile phones, many people are now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.

This, in my understanding, doesn't convey the original meaning. Could you please look into the same & guide?

Regards
Rohit
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackVerbalGMAT
twilight
Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.

(A) Because of wireless service costs plummeting in the last year, and as mobile phones are increasingly common, many people

(B) As the cost of wireless service plummeted in the last year and as mobile phones became increasingly common, many people

(C) In the last year, with the cost of wireless service plummeting, and mobile phones have become increasingly common, there are many people

(D) With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are

(E) While the cost of wireless service has plummeted in the last year and mobile phones are increasingly common, many people are

This question is based on Modifiers and Parallelism.

The modifier at the beginning of the sentence provides reasons for the fact that people are using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region and on weekends.

In Options A and B, there is a verb missing. The subject of the sentence is “many people”. There should be a verb after the subject to complete the idea but it is missing in both the options. Furthermore, as the modifier gives two reasons, the two reasons must be expressed in a structure that is similar. But Option A also lacks parallelism. Option B maintains parallelism but the sentence is still incomplete. So, Options A and B can be eliminated.

Option C contains a verb but lacks parallelism in the modifier – the prepositional phrase “with the cost of wireless service plummeting” is not parallel in structure to the clause “mobile phones have become increasingly common”. So, Option C can be eliminated.

Option D maintains the parallelism. The preposition ‘with’ has been mentioned only once but it applies to both the reasons – “the cost of wireless service plummeting” and “mobile phones becoming increasingly common”. So, Option D is correct.

The parallelism is maintained in this option also. However, this option contains the conjunction ‘while’, which implies a contrast not required in the sentence. So, Option E can also be eliminated.

Therefore, D is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.

Why "using" is not a verb of "people" in (B)?
   1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts