It is currently 23 Feb 2018, 06:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

With the muddy field delaying the advance

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Moderator
avatar
D
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 983
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member CAT Tests
With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 02:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:37) correct 33% (01:35) wrong based on 154 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily.

(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily

(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease

(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Always try to face your worst fear because nothing GOOD comes easy. You must be UNCOMFORTABLE to get to your COMFORT ZONE
Joined: 15 Aug 2014
Posts: 352
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 02:38
HKD1710 wrote:
With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily.

(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily

(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease

(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left


tough one!! what is the source of this question :(
_________________

"When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe, then you’ll be successful.” - Eric Thomas

I need to work on timing badly!!

SC Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1584
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Analyst (Retail)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 02:52
(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily - Incorrect - Usage of with is inappropriate in this context.

(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them - Incorrect - Awkward structure

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few - Correct - The only doubt I had here was the usage of 'these'

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease - Incorrect - Tense error. The French tried to advance but were delayed by the muddy field. Usage of 'had been' is not appropriate.

(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left - Incorrect - Wordy and sentence is in Passive Voice.

Between C and E, C is a better option.
Moderator
avatar
D
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 983
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 540 Q45 V20
GPA: 2.49
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 03:22
smartguy595 wrote:
tough one!! what is the source of this question :(


Its from Magoosh. Please see the tags :)

It would be good to know the following w.r.t. SCs like this one:

1. What to do when such a questions appears
2. what should be a general approach for such questions
3. Such a SC question looks time consuming so how to tackle it in a faster way
_________________

---------------------------------------------------------------
Target - 720-740
http://gmatclub.com/forum/information-on-new-gmat-esr-report-beta-221111.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/list-of-one-year-full-time-mba-programs-222103.html

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
D
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5660
With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 03:48
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi @HKD171,

The Q is not so tough as it may seem to be..
It is normal tendency to believe a Q to be tough when it is fully underlined, but it is not the case always..
Here you will find all choices EXCEPT C glaringly wrong.
Do not lose focus because it is completely underlined..
lets analuse the immediate thing that should strike us..


With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily.

(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily
.. the construction of three clause is not done properly
And the biggest Flaw is Preposition+Noun+Participle is almost always dicey in GMAT. we have an OG Q to on this issue


(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them
'delaying' should be a reason to eliminate it immediately as in A. Can be eliminated for the wordy and awkward construction

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few
usage of AND has cleared the wordiness that existed, joining different clauses correctly and 'modifier' with 'allowing ' correctly modifies preceding claause..

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease
usage of HAD BEEN and conditional WOULD is not appropriate..
Also BY muddy field should be DUE TO muddy field


(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left
the FRENCH INFANTRYMEN has also become subject and thus 'THEM and THEIR' can be ambiguous.
The construction on them, so their.. reduced, and the English.. left does not follow the proper construction


EDITING- forgot to put down the main point for A
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html


BANGALORE/-

2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4327
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 03:55
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily.

Quote:
This looks like a Magoosh topic. Mike is the one who can combine history, theology and English judiciously.



(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily --- The use of a preposition along with a noun followed by a participle, in the given context is wrong, because it involves two different agents doing two different things, and because the first part, essentially a modifier, cannot modify the agent of the second part namely the English longbowmen.

(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them ---Combination of a subordinate conjunction ‘when’ with a noun and a participle is grammatically wrong for the same reason as in A.

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few --- the best in the given context, of course with the small pinprick of the demonstrative pronoun ‘these’, as Vyshak pointed out.

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease --- varying widely with the intent of the original; use of ‘would' is particularly wrong.

(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left --- so their numbers were reduced implies a cause and effect, which is not there in the context, and then the unnecessary passive voice
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 338
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
Re: With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 04:03
HKD1710 wrote:
With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily.

(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily

(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them

(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease

(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left



Let me try this one!

(A) With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen, the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them, with the English infantry eventually eliminating their reduced numbers easily.

The first part of the sentence "With the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen" presents the reason ( contributory cause) why the English were able to inflict damage .However, " with" does not convey the reason. We generally use words such as since/because for presenting the reason.Hence, the use of with is wrong.

The second part of the sentence " the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt were able to inflict significant damage on them" looks grammatically correct.The only issue that may bother is the use of passive voice when active voice could have been used.

The third part of the sentence "with the English infantry eventually eliminating off their reduced numbers easily" is used to describe the result of the previous clause.Use of verbing modifier would have been better. With does not do justice when we need to present the result of the previous clause.Also " eliminating off their reduced numbers" is clumsy.



(B) When the muddy field delaying the advance of the French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt, with the English longbowmen being able to inflict significant damage on them, their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily was able to eliminate them

Use of multiple phrases .What is the phrase with " with" describing".

The followingpost by mike garry may help to explain the use of with.

maxwell-s-theory-of-electromagnetism-in-1865-was-the-first-163428.html#p1294666


(C) The muddy field delayed the advance of the French infantrymen at the battle of Agincourt, allowing the English longbowmen to inflict significant damage on them, and as the number of the French infantrymen was reduced, the English infantry easily could eliminate these remaining few

Correct. Usage of these is correct. These is followed by noun few.The sentence corrects the meaning and construction issues in A.

(D) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt tried to advance but had been delayed by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen inflicted significant damage on them, and the English infantry eventually would eliminate their reduced numbers with ease


The French tried to advance but were delayed by the muddy field. Usage of 'had been' is not appropriate.



(E) The French infantrymen at the Battle of Agincourt were delayed in their advance by the muddy field, and the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them, so their numbers were reduced, and the English infantry easily could eliminate those left

The sentence is divided uselessly into three independent clauses .The meaning of the sentence is lost when the the reason ( contributory cause) why the English were able to inflict damage is presented in a separate and unrelated clause to "the English longbowmen at the Battle of Agincourt inflicted significant damage on them".



i hope the above analysis is helpful and correct.


Do press Kudos if you find the above helpful.

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 338
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Reviews Badge
With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2016, 04:05
The following post from mikemcgarry may be relevant to the above.

maxwell-s-theory-of-electromagnetism-in-1865-was-the-first-163428.html#p1294666


mikemcgarry wrote:
intheend14 wrote:
Mike, a quick query for you. I read through your linked post on Magoosh about Dropping Common Words in Parallel on the GMAT. I understood all the explanations except this one.

As I read it, if you have "with + noun/phrase + participial phrase," this is incorrect on the GMAT. You should have a regular noun + verb phrase instead? Can you please clarify if I have misunderstood.

Dear intheend14,
I'm happy to respond. :-) This is a very subtle issue. It depends very much on context. It's perfectly correct if the "with" expresses the ordinary uses of "with" --- accompaniment, means, or manner:
accompaniment: I went to town with my friend writing a book.
mean: He dug the first scoop of earth with a spade once used by 19th century railroad workers.
manner: He strut into the room with a gait simply broadcasting his confidence across the room..
Those constructions are not problematic.

The problem occurs when a writer replaces a valid subordinate clause structure with this "with" structure.

Since the shipment from Uzbekistan was late, the salesman was unable to close the deal. = correct
With the shipment from Uzbekistan being late, the salesman was unable to close the deal. = atrociously incorrect

Since our infantry has overrun most of the city, aerial attacks would not be effective at this time. = correct
With our infantry having overrun most of the city, aerial attacks would not be effective at this time = atrociously incorrect

Does this distinction make sense?
Mike :-)




I donot mind Kudos.

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali


Last edited by samichange on 27 Mar 2016, 04:06, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1908
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
With the muddy field delaying the advance [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jan 2018, 14:30
Official explanation for why D is incorrect:

(D) This choice has a combination of small problems. The tense mismatch in the first part, "tried … but had been delayed," doesn't make sense. Presumably, the "trying" and the "being delayed" would be more or less simultaneous. Also, that first part is very wordy. The overall sentence is just connect with a string of and's, and this gives no sense of the logical interconnection of these events, what cause what. The antecedent of "their" is ambiguous. The hypothetical tense, "would eliminate," is strange and awkward for a factual historical event. This choice is incorrect.
With the muddy field delaying the advance   [#permalink] 11 Jan 2018, 14:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

With the muddy field delaying the advance

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.