GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Oct 2019, 22:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 23 Jan 2019, 00:01
2
14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:29) correct 27% (01:45) wrong based on 770 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy.  Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Which of the following would most likely support the data’s implication?

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.


Cannot decide between A and C. Can someone help explain it?
Thanks in advance.

Originally posted by katelyntanglu on 30 Jul 2017, 06:39.
Last edited by Bunuel on 23 Jan 2019, 00:01, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Posts: 50
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V32
Reviews Badge
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2017, 07:03
1
A
Both bee and pollen of the flower are required for allergy as per premise. So if bee is not present the allergy reaction is not caused
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 31 Mar 2017
Posts: 38
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V42
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
GMAT 3: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.73
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2017, 10:53
1
1
katelyntanglu wrote:
Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy.  Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy. Which of the following would most likely support the data’s implication?

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.


Cannot decide between A and C. Can someone help explain it?
Thanks in advance.


This is an inference question.

We know that "research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy". Therefore, the answer is A since the premise states that the flower must be pollinated by a certain kind of bee

As for C, the passage does not state whether many cases have been observed only in the presence of a bee. Perck Pharma Corporation may have conducted studies with or without the presence of bees and still came to the conclusion that the bee must pollinate the flower for allergy to occur (for example, they could have found traces of the bee in the flowers). In inference question, we have to know something for a fact and C is an assumption. therefore, C is incorrect
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 13 Aug 2011
Posts: 13
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.94
WE: Operations (Health Care)
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2017, 13:04
1
1
katelyntanglu wrote:
Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy.  Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy. Which of the following would most likely support the data’s implication?

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.


Cannot decide between A and C. Can someone help explain it?
Thanks in advance.


To eliminate C

The key word here is Many cases. Many does not mean all.
The conclusion says - in all cases the bee is required to pollinate the flower for the allergy
_________________
GMAT PREP1 - 720
GMAT PREP2 - 760
GMAT ExamPack1 - Exam 1 - 740
GMAT ExamPack1 - Exam 2 - 720
GMAT ExamPack2 - Exam 1 - 720
GMAT ExamPack2 - Exam 2 - 740

GMAT - 710
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1007
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2017, 08:07
Imo A
Between A and C A is better .
Moreover we have to carefully the words such as all,many and some for questions like these .
_________________
Please give kudos if you find my answers useful
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2400
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 07:26
jwang516 wrote:
We know that "research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy". Therefore, the answer is A since the premise states that the flower must be pollinated by a certain kind of bee

As for C, the passage does not state whether many cases have been observed only in the presence of a bee. Perck Pharma Corporation may have conducted studies with or without the presence of bees and still came to the conclusion that the bee must pollinate the flower for allergy to occur (for example, they could have found traces of the bee in the flowers). In inference question, we have to know something for a fact and C is an assumption. therefore, C is incorrect


Hi jwang516,
This is a strengthen question and not an inference question.

Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy. Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Type - strengthen
Boil it down - Allergy is caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.
We have 2 necessary conditions to cause allergy here-
1. Pollen of the certain flower
2. Only when the flower has been pollinated a certain kind of bee


(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions - Correct - If the flower was not pollinated by that particular bee, then the pollen will not cause the allergy
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower. - Irrelevant
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee - Incorrect - we have no idea whether that pollen of that particular plant is involved here
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee - Incorrect
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present. - Incorrect - this weakens as pollen is not necessary

Answer A
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Aug 2018
Posts: 48
GMAT 1: 610 Q46 V28
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2018, 08:36
Skywalker18 wrote:
jwang516 wrote:
We know that "research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy". Therefore, the answer is A since the premise states that the flower must be pollinated by a certain kind of bee

As for C, the passage does not state whether many cases have been observed only in the presence of a bee. Perck Pharma Corporation may have conducted studies with or without the presence of bees and still came to the conclusion that the bee must pollinate the flower for allergy to occur (for example, they could have found traces of the bee in the flowers). In inference question, we have to know something for a fact and C is an assumption. therefore, C is incorrect


Hi jwang516,
This is a strengthen question and not an inference question.

Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy. Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Type - strengthen
Boil it down - Allergy is caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.
We have 2 necessary conditions to cause allergy here-
1. Pollen of the certain flower
2. Only when the flower has been pollinated a certain kind of bee


(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions - Correct - If the flower was not pollinated by that particular bee, then the pollen will not cause the allergy
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower. - Irrelevant
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee - Incorrect - we have no idea whether that pollen of that particular plant is involved here
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee - Incorrect
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present. - Incorrect - this weakens as pollen is not necessary

Answer A


Hi Skywalker18, VeritasKarishma

Got stuck between A and D.

Argument says that if the flowers are not pollinated by the specific bees the flower would not grow on to become allergic.

Option 'D' says that if the allergy has not developed that means the flower has grown with the presence of THE bee.

Won't this reason support data's implication in the argument ?

Option 'A' seemed too straight forward almost like it's stating the same thing mentioned in the argument.

Can you please explain the flaw in my reasoning ?

Many Thanks
Saurabh

Posted from my mobile device
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9705
Location: Pune, India
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2018, 04:17
1
katelyntanglu wrote:
Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy.  Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Which of the following would most likely support the data’s implication?

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.


Cannot decide between A and C. Can someone help explain it?
Thanks in advance.


Such questions are best explained by discussing the conditional statements framework:
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/1 ... tatements/

The argument tells us that as per the new research, the allergy happens ONLY IF a particular bee pollinates the flower.

Note how do we establish the ONLY IF relation:
Only if A, then B (Only if "that specific bee", then "allergy")
- B implies A (allergy implies that specific bee)
- Not A implies not B (No bee means no allergy)
If both the above points are established, then we can establish the "only if" relation. (Or if the only if relation is established, then the above two points are its implications)

Option (A) gives you "no bee means no allergy". This helps in establishing the only if relation.

(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee.
Option (D) gives you "not B implies not A". This does not help us in establishing the only if relation.

Let's look at other options too:
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
Doesn't help. We want to establish that when the bee pollinates, only then the allergy happens.

(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
"Many" is not good enough to establish the "only if bee, then allergy" case.

(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.
This questions the already established fact - this allergy is caused by the pollen of a particular flower.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 495
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2019, 18:10
Is there difference between "only if" and "if" statements?

Previously I understood as below.
If A then B
means
Not B, not A.

Similar concept we use in "x led y".
No Y, no x.

But in case of only if A then B.
If not A, not B.


Please explain. I want to correct myself if I am wrong.

VeritasKarishma wrote:
katelyntanglu wrote:
Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy.  Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Which of the following would most likely support the data’s implication?

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.


Cannot decide between A and C. Can someone help explain it?
Thanks in advance.


Such questions are best explained by discussing the conditional statements framework:
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/1 ... tatements/

The argument tells us that as per the new research, the allergy happens ONLY IF a particular bee pollinates the flower.

Note how do we establish the ONLY IF relation:
Only if A, then B (Only if "that specific bee", then "allergy")
- B implies A (allergy implies that specific bee)
- Not A implies not B (No bee means no allergy)
If both the above points are established, then we can establish the "only if" relation. (Or if the only if relation is established, then the above two points are its implications)

Option (A) gives you "no bee means no allergy". This helps in establishing the only if relation.

(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee.
Option (D) gives you "not B implies not A". This does not help us in establishing the only if relation.

Let's look at other options too:
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
Doesn't help. We want to establish that when the bee pollinates, only then the allergy happens.

(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
"Many" is not good enough to establish the "only if bee, then allergy" case.

(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.
This questions the already established fact - this allergy is caused by the pollen of a particular flower.
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 995
Location: India
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2019, 20:28
katelyntanglu wrote:
Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of allergy.  Their research confirms that not only is it caused by pollen of a certain flower, as it was thought, but also the flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Which of the following would most likely support the data’s implication?

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee
(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.


SO the question is
Allergy is caused by pollen of a certain flower and that flower has to be pollinated by a certain kind of bee to cause the allergy.

Since its an AND, both have to be present for the allergy to be present.

(A) In the absence of the bee, the pollen does not cause allergic reactions
Bee is removed, pollen wont cause allergy -> this supports the data.

(B) The bee has been shown to be a critical element in the reproduction of the particular flower.
reproduction -> OOS

(C) Many cases of the allergy have been observed only in the presence of the bee
Many cases is open ended, Allergy can or cannot happen. -> Out

(D) In cases in which the allergy does not develop, the flower will grow without the presence of the bee -> Eliminate
I was stuck here for a moment, This is a different case, not pertaining to the argument.
Here it is talking about the growth of the flower, we were concerned with its pollination by bee.
This just meant that some other bee is helping the flower to grow.

(E) The onset of the allergy is usually caused by the flower even if the pollen is not present.
This is irrelevant.
_________________
If you notice any discrepancy in my reasoning, please let me know. Lets improve together.

Quote which i can relate to.
Many of life's failures happen with people who do not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9705
Location: Pune, India
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2019, 23:35
1
gvij2017 wrote:
Is there difference between "only if" and "if" statements?

Previously I understood as below.
If A then B
means
Not B, not A.

Similar concept we use in "x led y".
No Y, no x.

But in case of only if A then B.
If not A, not B.


Please explain. I want to correct myself if I am wrong.



Check out this post: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/1 ... tatements/
It talks about "if" and "only if" statements.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 495
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2019, 00:03
Thanks for sharing such a helpful link!

:)
VeritasKarishma wrote:
gvij2017 wrote:
Is there difference between "only if" and "if" statements?

Previously I understood as below.
If A then B
means
Not B, not A.

Similar concept we use in "x led y".
No Y, no x.

But in case of only if A then B.
If not A, not B.


Please explain. I want to correct myself if I am wrong.



Check out this post: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2012/1 ... tatements/
It talks about "if" and "only if" statements.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of   [#permalink] 23 Jan 2019, 00:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Bio-chemists at Perck Pharma Corporation have discovered a new type of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne