takingback
kcw984
Congratulations to all who have received R2 interview invites and best wishes to my fellow R1 waitlisters.
Now that we are one week away from the Feb 16 waitlist "update date", has anyone learned anything new about what we can expect? It seems the speculation up until this point has mostly been negative (ie only dings will be released to some candidates, but no admits).
On my end, I spoke to a friend who is on the student adcom; they stressed several times that they are not involved in the waitlist process so they don't have direct knowledge, but said that they would be surprised if there were dings this early on in the process. Essentially, their thought process was that it costs Booth very little or nothing to maintain the WL, so kicking people off now would only limit their potential options later.
Any thoughts?
Posted from my mobile device
They made it sound like their motivation is to provide the courtesy to the people on the waitlist with a decision a month sooner than they normally would hear back. I don't think it has anything to do with costs, I think they oversubscribed the waitlist by either admitting too few than they normally would or waitlisting more borderline people they otherwise would have rejected. After being able to review the R2 candidates for a month now, they can probably gauge the number of potential applicants they plan to admit and thereby adjust it accordingly. What I think it means is that a R2 candidate probably "replaces" a similar quality candidate on the waitlist, thereby resulting in a rejection decision on February 16th for that waitlist candidate. Because I'm assuming that their main goal is to fill R2 spots with R2 candidates, I just think it would be weird to admit a waitlist candidate without admitting an R2 candidate because theoretically that would imply that that waitlist candidate is better and more deserving than any R2 candidate. For that reason, I think Feb 16 will only be denials for waitlisters. I do hope I'm wrong though because an admit then would be awesome.
I agree with most of this, but I don't think R2 vs. R1 waitlist plays into the decision. For two similar applicants, adcoms see both as simply applicants and have no reason to use R2 vs. R1 waitlist as a tiebreaker.
Also, I agree that courtesy is the major factor, but costs could play a role. Having a really large waitlist means managing a larger list of people and needing more staff time processing updates and communications from them. Maybe it's not significant, but there are definitely costs to keeping a very large waitlist.
I also think that Feb 16 will be likely be all denials, and then waitlist admits will come at the same time as the R2 admits. Whether the decision comes in February or March, I'm hoping to see lots of you make it in off the waitlist!