Seems we just have a different opinion.
Surely there are extreme cases that can be perfectly understood but oversimplifying it, just think that you needed to have the GMAT beforehand, you did not prepare well, or you just went to the limit (like I did) and then you had some delay, if you still do not manage to provide the score, they have said it, you won't be accepted.
You can find endless excuses for it but correlating this with the lack of justice in the world... mate, you should review your words. It is disrespectful for the ones that really suffer in topics that matter, I am talking about comments that feel like someone is trying to cheat the system benefiting from a pandemic situation, bringing a smoke curtain of rights, equality, etc is nonsense.
The study should have happened before, you can always apply at a later round or intake, if you are unemployed (btw, I am) and in need, you can ask for taking the GMAT for free, get a fee waiver on your application, etc.
We could debate about the fairness of MBA applications, etc but it is a completely different topic, and in objective terms, making excuses (if there are no material issues) for not taking a GMAT/GRE or trying to squeeze the deadlines to take it later does not seem fair for the ones that prepared and applied within the established terms.
Regards,
Pablo
DuaQuad wrote:
pabpinor wrote:
Seriously guys, I could not take the GMAT before because of a job interview and then Covid, but I do not see how we should not be kind of "downgraded" by the adcom somehow versus the candidates that submitted their applications with a GMAT score.
To be clear, a GMAT score (or GRE) is needed to send an application, due to this unforeseen circumstance the policy has been relaxed, but for anyone applying in R2 they should have had the GMAT taken before May 20th, otherwise, their applications would have not been accepted.
If you think you need more time, maybe is better than you talk to your AO and delay your evaluation to R3, but with the GMAT online available, etc I feel that taking the GMAT on July 15th, or thinking that "
there is no point preparing for GMAT if profile get rejected at interview stage itself" like
DailySeeker should really weight you down and probably you won't make it in. It does not seem fair to the other candidates, and without any offense, I'm sure I would not like to have in my study group someone with that approach.
I'm just another candidate, you better check with your AO on that, but I would say if you have not started preparing the GMAT yet, with less than a month you won't be getting close to what it is required.
Regards,
Pablo
DailySeeker wrote:
Hello All,
Do we need to take the GMAT before 20th July?
Like shall i focus on GMAT now or wait for the school to call for interviews..there is no point preparing for GMAT if profile get rejected at interview stage itself.
If the AdCom indeed adopts this view (i.e. those who did not submit a score beforehand were not prepared enough) it is severely disappointing as it neglects important factors to do with privilege and diversity that INSEAD boasts are its core values. The pandemic was not a great leveller - it has affected those who were worse off far more severely. So, for instance, lockdowns mean those with less room in their house to study in quiet spaces could not do so as easily as they used to do in public libraries. Layoffs or furloughs would put tremendous pressures on the lesser off to move home to parents - again no private space to study or take exams in your own privacy and comfort. What if you don't have parents nearby? The list goes on quite endlessly.
I submitted with a score by the way. But I disagree to downgrade the no-score applications. What a severe lack of judgment that would be. And at a time when the world is fighting for justice for those who've lacked it for so long.