Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 00:00 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 00:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
vannbj
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Status:Yeah well whatever.
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE:Analyst (Insurance)
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 245
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Iamnotaprimenumber
Joined: 29 Nov 2010
Last visit: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 179
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:Indiana, Texas, Emory
Posts: 179
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
His direct quote was "I got an email saying that the deadline was extented." I'll inquire further to confirm this. :-)
User avatar
method
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 27 Feb 2021
Posts: 684
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 249
Status:Go Blue!
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
GPA: 3.22
WE:Management Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
Posts: 684
Kudos: 157
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I received this email:

Consortium
It is not too late to submit your application for consideration this year! To ensure that your application is considered for Fall 2011 admission, submit your application today. The application will close on February 1. Time is running out!

If you have questions about the application process, please contact The Consortium Recruiting Team at (314) 877-5500 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

The Consortium Recruiting Team
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i think we can consider the case of the floating deadline officially solved!
User avatar
method
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 27 Feb 2021
Posts: 684
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 249
Status:Go Blue!
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
GPA: 3.22
WE:Management Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
Posts: 684
Kudos: 157
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
money9111
i think we can consider the case of the floating deadline officially solved!

Yep, yep, hopefully that doesn't cause delays for everyone who colored inside the lines.

And good luck to you money, I visit your blog from time to time and hope you get into your first choice. I think if schools followed the "who would you want to sit next to on a flight" concept for MBA admissions, you'd be a clear admit anywhere, but of course it's a bit trickier than that!
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
method
money9111
i think we can consider the case of the floating deadline officially solved!

Yep, yep, hopefully that doesn't cause delays for everyone who colored inside the lines.

And good luck to you money, I visit your blog from time to time and hope you get into your first choice. I think if schools followed the "who would you want to sit next to on a flight" concept for MBA admissions, you'd be a clear admit anywhere, but of course it's a bit trickier than that!

i literally lol'ed @ "colored inside the lines"

Thanks for reading my blog... if I had your stats I would feel much more confident! but at this point i need all of the stars to align twice in a row on the same day while a lunar eclipse is occurring after i've climbed mt. everest barefoot while updating my facebook status on my cell phone. so fingers crossed haha
avatar
loloswims
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Last visit: 25 Jan 2011
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Posts: 56
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
method
I received this email:

Consortium
It is not too late to submit your application for consideration this year! To ensure that your application is considered for Fall 2011 admission, submit your application today. The application will close on February 1. Time is running out!

If you have questions about the application process, please contact The Consortium Recruiting Team at (314) 877-5500 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

The Consortium Recruiting Team

Well AIN'T that a $*%&&#:) I still think the fellowship decision will be negatively impacted with a late app as indicated on the Consortium website.
avatar
shewhomustnotbenamed
Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Last visit: 27 Nov 2011
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 22
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
loloswims
method
I received this email:

Consortium
It is not too late to submit your application for consideration this year! To ensure that your application is considered for Fall 2011 admission, submit your application today. The application will close on February 1. Time is running out!

If you have questions about the application process, please contact The Consortium Recruiting Team at (314) 877-5500 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

The Consortium Recruiting Team

Well AIN'T that a $*%&&#:) I still think the fellowship decision will be negatively impacted with a late app as indicated on the Consortium website.

I wonder how strongly the extension correlates to a drop in application numbers/quality?

I aks because last year's forum was brutal in terms of Consortium applicants who reported being admitted and receiving the fellowship (overall, 900+ applicants, 400+Consortium membership invites, ~300 fellowship recipients--don't remember actuals numbers). I inquired about the turnabout during my Yale SOM visit (where I think there are only 2 CGSM Fellows 2012-correct me if i'm wrong) versus a larger number 2011. The Adm Director very candidly said that the application quality was siginificantly lower last year plus less money in the pool and that they hoped to bring in more this year, but if the application quality was similar to last year's, they would not.

Thoughts???
User avatar
lagomez
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Last visit: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
563
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 563
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It depends on how you define quality. I know some applicants that were dinged by Consortium schools but yet accepted to higher ranked schools. I wouldn't necessarily call them lower quality. Additionally, some were accepted that one could consider questionable quality. Point being, there will always be quality candidates but perhaps not the quality a school is looking for. Seriously, how many times have you visited a school and were left wondering "how in the heck did this person make it through"?
User avatar
vannbj
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Status:Yeah well whatever.
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE:Analyst (Insurance)
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 245
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lagomez
It depends on how you define quality. I know some applicants that were dinged by Consortium schools but yet accepted to higher ranked schools. I wouldn't necessarily call them lower quality. Additionally, some were accepted that one could consider questionable quality. Point being, there will always be quality candidates but perhaps not the quality a school is looking for. Seriously, how many times have you visited a school and were left wondering "how in the heck did this person make it through"?

Wouldn't the consortium schools ding those that they think are more likely to turn down admission to go to higher ranked schools? Aren't they trying to protect their yields? If I were Cornell and a consortium applicant was an AA male with a 730 gmat, 3 years at Carlyle, and a 3.8 gpa in Physics from MIT then why would I admit him and offer the Park fellowship when his essay and interview didn't convince me of "why Johnson"? Dude's a shoe in for somewhere else so I'd have to be convinced that he want's to come to my program over that other place.
User avatar
vannbj
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Status:Yeah well whatever.
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE:Analyst (Insurance)
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 245
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shewhomustnotbenamed

I wonder how strongly the extension correlates to a drop in application numbers/quality?

I aks because last year's forum was brutal in terms of Consortium applicants who reported being admitted and receiving the fellowship (overall, 900+ applicants, 400+Consortium membership invites, ~300 fellowship recipients--don't remember actuals numbers). I inquired about the turnabout during my Yale SOM visit (where I think there are only 2 CGSM Fellows 2012-correct me if i'm wrong) versus a larger number 2011. The Adm Director very candidly said that the application quality was siginificantly lower last year plus less money in the pool and that they hoped to bring in more this year, but if the application quality was similar to last year's, they would not.

Thoughts???

That’s amazing because the average GMAT and GPA for the overall pool at almost all top schools has been steadily rising. Maybe a bunch of applicants just had horrible essays and interviews. idk
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vannbj
shewhomustnotbenamed

I wonder how strongly the extension correlates to a drop in application numbers/quality?

I aks because last year's forum was brutal in terms of Consortium applicants who reported being admitted and receiving the fellowship (overall, 900+ applicants, 400+Consortium membership invites, ~300 fellowship recipients--don't remember actuals numbers). I inquired about the turnabout during my Yale SOM visit (where I think there are only 2 CGSM Fellows 2012-correct me if i'm wrong) versus a larger number 2011. The Adm Director very candidly said that the application quality was siginificantly lower last year plus less money in the pool and that they hoped to bring in more this year, but if the application quality was similar to last year's, they would not.

Thoughts???

That’s amazing because the average GMAT and GPA for the overall pool at almost all top schools has been steadily rising. Maybe a bunch of applicants just had horrible essays and interviews. idk

gotta convey fit.. that's my motto! lol the only thing keeping me in the game too! ;-)
User avatar
lagomez
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Last visit: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vannbj
lagomez
It depends on how you define quality. I know some applicants that were dinged by Consortium schools but yet accepted to higher ranked schools. I wouldn't necessarily call them lower quality. Additionally, some were accepted that one could consider questionable quality. Point being, there will always be quality candidates but perhaps not the quality a school is looking for. Seriously, how many times have you visited a school and were left wondering "how in the heck did this person make it through"?

Wouldn't the consortium schools ding those that they think are more likely to turn down admission to go to higher ranked schools? Aren't they trying to protect their yields? If I were Cornell and a consortium applicant was an AA male with a 730 gmat, 3 years at Carlyle, and a 3.8 gpa in Physics from MIT then why would I admit him and offer the Park fellowship when his essay and interview didn't convince me of "why Johnson"? Dude's a shoe in for somewhere else so I'd have to be convinced that he want's to come to my program over that other place.

Yeah, sure maybe applicants like that. But how many applicants do you see like that that would apply to the Consortium anyway?
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just to play devils advocate - " If I were Cornell and a consortium applicant was an AA male with a 730 gmat, 3 years at Carlyle, and a 3.8 gpa in Physics from MIT then why would I admit him and offer the Park fellowship when his essay and interview didn't convince me of "why Johnson"?"

Why would you reject this applicant? You'd be assuming that the applicant conveyed fit at all of the other schools he applied too. Meaning yours would be the anomaly. This could just be a hunch and a very naive statement, but I would not think that schools reject a profile of this caliber to prevent their yield #'s from going down.
User avatar
vannbj
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Status:Yeah well whatever.
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE:Analyst (Insurance)
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 245
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lagomez
vannbj
lagomez
It depends on how you define quality. I know some applicants that were dinged by Consortium schools but yet accepted to higher ranked schools. I wouldn't necessarily call them lower quality. Additionally, some were accepted that one could consider questionable quality. Point being, there will always be quality candidates but perhaps not the quality a school is looking for. Seriously, how many times have you visited a school and were left wondering "how in the heck did this person make it through"?

Wouldn't the consortium schools ding those that they think are more likely to turn down admission to go to higher ranked schools? Aren't they trying to protect their yields? If I were Cornell and a consortium applicant was an AA male with a 730 gmat, 3 years at Carlyle, and a 3.8 gpa in Physics from MIT then why would I admit him and offer the Park fellowship when his essay and interview didn't convince me of "why Johnson"? Dude's a shoe in for somewhere else so I'd have to be convinced that he want's to come to my program over that other place.

Yeah, sure maybe applicants like that. But how many applicants do you see like that that would apply to the Consortium anyway?

If you do the math it's between 27 and 36 depending on your definitions of strong applicants.... I'm practicing pulling numbers out of my butt so I'm just kidding. I just used this as an extreme example.
User avatar
vannbj
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 245
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Status:Yeah well whatever.
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE:Analyst (Insurance)
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 245
Kudos: 283
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
money9111
Just to play devils advocate - " If I were Cornell and a consortium applicant was an AA male with a 730 gmat, 3 years at Carlyle, and a 3.8 gpa in Physics from MIT then why would I admit him and offer the Park fellowship when his essay and interview didn't convince me of "why Johnson"?"

Why would you reject this applicant? You'd be assuming that the applicant conveyed fit at all of the other schools he applied too. Meaning yours would be the anomaly. This could just be a hunch and a very naive statement, but I would not think that schools reject a profile of this caliber to prevent their yield #'s from going down.

I've heard of very numerically qualified applicants doing piss-poor jobs on their essays at the not as elite schools because they're like "What? Are you gonna reject me? I'm almost too sexy for your school. Now throw my greatness some money before I ride off in the sunset." If this attitude came across to me then I'd ding that dude in a heartbeat. I was pretending that my proposed physicist fell into this category.
User avatar
lagomez
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Last visit: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 1,224
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 1,224
Kudos: 563
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just for curiosity, I wonder what the averages look like for Consortium applicants. Any guesses?
avatar
money9111
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 22 Oct 2010
Last visit: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 518
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Schools:Cornell (accepted)
Posts: 518
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vannbj
money9111
Just to play devils advocate - " If I were Cornell and a consortium applicant was an AA male with a 730 gmat, 3 years at Carlyle, and a 3.8 gpa in Physics from MIT then why would I admit him and offer the Park fellowship when his essay and interview didn't convince me of "why Johnson"?"

Why would you reject this applicant? You'd be assuming that the applicant conveyed fit at all of the other schools he applied too. Meaning yours would be the anomaly. This could just be a hunch and a very naive statement, but I would not think that schools reject a profile of this caliber to prevent their yield #'s from going down.

I've heard of very numerically qualified applicants doing piss-poor jobs on their essays at the not as elite schools because they're like "What? Are you gonna reject me? I'm almost too sexy for your school. Now throw my greatness some money before I ride off in the sunset." If this attitude came across to me then I'd ding that dude in a heartbeat. I was pretending that my proposed physicist fell into this category.


aaahh i see...
   1  ...  12   13   14   15   16  ...  132   
Moderator:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts