targetemba
Since EA is now accepted by Wharton, I think IR (GMAT) should not hold much value. 4 hour test compared to 1.5 hour test is not logical. More the time a candidate spends on test, greater the difficulty. Thats my take.
Well good point, as long as Wharton's reasoning is sames as yours
I attended a macroeconomics class
Berkeley MBA and can clearly see the applications of IR, and we all do graphical interpretation day-in / day-out for running business so it is definitely a skill desired. But my point is , Its the time that killed me at IR section as opposed to my inability in interpreting graph ...but then everyone has to go thru the same grill anyways !
Wondering - How come 57 in verbal and 47 in qunat, ended up in a score of 650.... QQ