It is currently 22 Oct 2017, 05:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# cars

Author Message
VP
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 1098

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Location: London

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 14:32
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of
odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 10 Jun 2007
Posts: 1434

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 14:40
Ravshonbek wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of
odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

A bit tough, but went with E

I feel that E has the most precise meaning. A and B suggests that the automobile manufacturer will pay for all cars and this isn't the intended meaning here. D sounds like the manufacturer tested drive the car. For C, I didn't pick it because "its" has no clear reference & passive.

Kudos [?]: 352 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 523

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 14:43
Prefer D over E for conciseness.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 910

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 14:48
Ravshonbek wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of
odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

E for clarity.

A and B convey the wrong meaning
C "its cars having been..." is wrong
D sounds like the manufacturers did the crime themselves

Last edited by beckee529 on 06 Oct 2007, 14:49, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 14:49
Very slight difference between A and E which I did not catch at first.
Choice E is correct because it states that the manufacturer will pay for THEIR cars, not all the other cars which were test driven with broken adometers.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 18:08
I would go for A.

B is out for pronoun error: the manufacturer should be referred to as 'his' or 'her' if the manufacturer is actually a person. if the manufacturer is a company, then 'it' is fine, but then 'it' cannot actually do the test-driving, as the sentence suggests

C is out for using "have been" - which makes it passive, wordy and inconcise.

D: presuming that the manufacturer is a company rather than a person, the manufacturer cannot actually do the test-driving. Therefore out.

E: Starting of with "having" accentuates that the main reason for the fine is for "having" the car, but its not, since the main reason for the fine is for test-driving it without a connected odometer.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 867

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 20:08
Ravshonbek wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.

(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

D is better over A. D says "test driven cars had their odometers disconnected" where as A says "cars with disconnected odometers were test driven".

So A changes the meaning but D keeps the meaning as it is.

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 7

Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 575

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 20:48
Ravshonbek wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of
odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

A B D has "their" with no clear precedent . C looks passive.

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 22:34
between d and e i will go with D. Both are good contenders.

What is the Oa?

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2554

Kudos [?]: 517 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2007, 23:13
Ravshonbek wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of
odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

Vote for E.

agreed to pay damages for... cars? no. we need to modify this correctly.

So A and B are out.

C: awkward and passive.
D: their has no clear referent.

E: most concise and clear.

Kudos [?]: 517 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 04 Oct 2007
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2007, 04:44
I would go with E, doesn't D change the meaning of the sentence also?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 177

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2008, 16:17
E as well

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1437

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2008, 09:52
E

same explanation as GMATBLACKBELT

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 12

Director
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 685

Kudos [?]: 604 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2008, 07:36
Folks,

I picked E and was surprised to see the OA as D.
What do you guys think?
_________________

Persistence+Patience+Persistence+Patience=G...O...A...L

Kudos [?]: 604 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2947

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2008, 22:54
Repeat post ? I remember answering D for this one not too long ago.
Ravshonbek wrote:
In December of 1987 an automobile manufacturer pleaded no contest to criminal charges of odometer tampering and agreed to pay more than \$16 million in civil damages for cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected.
(A) cars that were test-driven with their odometers disconnected
(B) cars that it had test-driven with their disconnected odometers
(C) its cars having been test-driven with disconnected odometers
(D) having test-driven cars with their odometers disconnected
(E) having cars that were test-driven with disconnected odometers

Kudos [?]: 667 [0], given: 210

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1487

Kudos [?]: 1456 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2010, 04:35
I cannot decide between A and D.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1456 [0], given: 2

Re: cars   [#permalink] 17 Oct 2010, 04:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by