It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 05:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Chess

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 241 [2], given: 194

Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2010, 22:42
2
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

31% (01:11) correct 69% (01:12) wrong based on 21 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Kudos [?]: 241 [2], given: 194

Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 404

Kudos [?]: 249 [1], given: 50

Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 00:35
1
KUDOS
Financier wrote:

Options:
A -- Out of scope.
B -- New information introduced and it may or may not weaken the argument.
C -- Good candidate since the line of reasoning proposed by the consortium is broken with a parallel example.
D -- Out of scope.
E -- Out of scope.

C wins.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Kudos [?]: 249 [1], given: 50

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 194

Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 00:39
ezhilkumarank wrote:
Financier wrote:

Options:
A -- Out of scope.
B -- New information introduced and it may or may not weaken the argument.
C -- Good candidate since the line of reasoning proposed by the consortium is broken with a parallel example.
D -- Out of scope.
E -- Out of scope.

C wins.

Yes, you are right. OA is "C".

But I ruled out "C" on the basis that differencies between two games may outweight the similarities between them.

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 194

Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 404

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 50

Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 00:46
I guess we should stick as close to the stimulus/argument and options at hand. Yes, in the real world there might be various factors coming into play but for this question we need to eliminate all those except for the most common sense assumptions/factors.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Kudos [?]: 249 [0], given: 50

Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 02:35
ezhilkumarank wrote:
Financier wrote:

Options:
A -- Out of scope.
B -- New information introduced and it may or may not weaken the argument.
C -- Good candidate since the line of reasoning proposed by the consortium is broken with a parallel example.
D -- Out of scope.
E -- Out of scope.

C wins.

Good question ... great explanation
_________________

Please give me kudos, if you like the above post.
Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 5

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 949 [0], given: 621

GPA: 3.77

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 11:48
My take is A.

Reasoning is:

Premise 1: People enjoy plyaing chess when they have equal intellectual abilities.
A-Premise2: It is hard to find suitable opponent.

B-conclusion: Thus, few people play chess. (becasue of premise2).

A->B in this argument. We have to find either something other than influences B, or demonstrate that the relationship is reversed. actually B->A

So, I see A valid because price of a set of chess is the other factor that influences people to play less chess. Those who like to play intellectual games like chess, actually choose other games, because a set of chess is expensive.

Why in C we compare chess and tenis? Here is an unsupported assumption that even if the games are different the trends in all the games are similar.This may not be true.

Why C?
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 949 [0], given: 621

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 1954 [2], given: 6

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 12:48
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
I agree with pkit above; if the answer is C, this is a bad question. Sure, tennis and chess may both be more fun if you play against someone of equal ability. That doesn't mean that it's just as easy to find a suitable chess opponent as it is to find a suitable tennis opponent, and that's the key question here; it may be that all beginning tennis players are roughly equal in ability, or that tennis was already so popular that finding an appropriate opponent is easy. If C told us that it was hard to find a suitable tennis opponent, and yet tennis was still becoming increasingly popular, then C might be a good answer, but as it stands, it doesn't do much to 'undermine' the consortium's opinion, since it doesn't compare tennis and chess on the correct grounds.

Answer A does provide an alternative explanation for the unpopularity of chess - it's expensive. So it's a perfectly good answer.

I'd add that this does seem like one of those poorly constructed prep company questions, and doesn't have much in common with real GMAT CR, so it isn't worth spending time on.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 1954 [2], given: 6

Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1391

Kudos [?]: 949 [1], given: 621

GPA: 3.77

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 12:51
1
KUDOS
IanStewart wrote:
I agree with pkit above; if the answer is C, this is a bad question. Sure, tennis and chess may both be more fun if you play against someone of equal ability. That doesn't mean that it's just as easy to find a suitable chess opponent as it is to find a suitable tennis opponent, and that's the key question here; it may be that all beginning tennis players are roughly equal in ability, or that tennis was already so popular that finding an appropriate opponent is easy. If C told us that it was hard to find a suitable tennis opponent, and yet tennis was still becoming increasingly popular, then C might be a good answer, but as it stands, it doesn't do much to 'undermine' the consortium's opinion, since it doesn't compare tennis and chess on the correct grounds.

Answer A does provide an alternative explanation for the unpopularity of chess - it's expensive. So it's a perfectly good answer.

I'd add that this does seem like one of those poorly constructed prep company questions, and doesn't have much in common with real GMAT CR, so it isn't worth spending time on.

Thank you a lot Ian for helping us!
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 949 [1], given: 621

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 295

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 194

Schools: Chicago Booth Class of 2013

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 13:07
IanStewart wrote:
I agree with pkit above; if the answer is C, this is a bad question. Sure, tennis and chess may both be more fun if you play against someone of equal ability. That doesn't mean that it's just as easy to find a suitable chess opponent as it is to find a suitable tennis opponent, and that's the key question here; it may be that all beginning tennis players are roughly equal in ability, or that tennis was already so popular that finding an appropriate opponent is easy. If C told us that it was hard to find a suitable tennis opponent, and yet tennis was still becoming increasingly popular, then C might be a good answer, but as it stands, it doesn't do much to 'undermine' the consortium's opinion, since it doesn't compare tennis and chess on the correct grounds.

Answer A does provide an alternative explanation for the unpopularity of chess - it's expensive. So it's a perfectly good answer.

I'd add that this does seem like one of those poorly constructed prep company questions, and doesn't have much in common with real GMAT CR, so it isn't worth spending time on.

Thanks Ian!

I've burned all official verbal material and want more practice, that's why I study such terrible stuff

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 194

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Posts: 97

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 17:51
its clearly C

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 55 [1], given: 15

WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2010, 21:24
1
KUDOS
IanStewart wrote:
I agree with pkit above; if the answer is C, this is a bad question. Sure, tennis and chess may both be more fun if you play against someone of equal ability. That doesn't mean that it's just as easy to find a suitable chess opponent as it is to find a suitable tennis opponent, and that's the key question here; it may be that all beginning tennis players are roughly equal in ability, or that tennis was already so popular that finding an appropriate opponent is easy. If C told us that it was hard to find a suitable tennis opponent, and yet tennis was still becoming increasingly popular, then C might be a good answer, but as it stands, it doesn't do much to 'undermine' the consortium's opinion, since it doesn't compare tennis and chess on the correct grounds.

Answer A does provide an alternative explanation for the unpopularity of chess - it's expensive. So it's a perfectly good answer.

I'd add that this does seem like one of those poorly constructed prep company questions, and doesn't have much in common with real GMAT CR, so it isn't worth spending time on.

Totally Agree with IanStewart and pkit. I think A is a perfect answer. I was trying to find a loop hole in my logic to see how I could C be an answer. Honestly I had created an explanation as well. But the post from IanStewart and pkit made me realise at times the OA may not be correct and one needs to be confident on his own techniques.

+1 to pkit on this one.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 55 [1], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2010, 20:15
B relies upon an example of two competitive opponents playing one another. This implies that kids should always be able to find a challenging opponent, albeit a computer opponent, of comparable ability to play. This would weaken the argument if the conclusion did not state the difficulty of two persons to find competitive opponents.

Therefore, C seems to be the best option, although certainly not a perfect choice.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

Re: Chess   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2010, 20:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by