It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# cr-heart attack

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

cr-heart attack [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 08:54
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Of 2,500 people who survived a first heart attack, those who did not smoke had their first heart attack at a median age of 62. However, of those 2,500, people who smoked two packs of cigarettes a day had their first heart attack at a median age of 51. On the basis of this information, it can be concluded that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.
The conclusion is incorrectly drawn from the information given because this information does not include
(A) the relative severity of heart attacks suffered by smokers and nonsmokers
(B) the nature of the different medical treatments that smokers and nonsmokers received after they had survived their first heart attack
(C) how many of the 2,500 people studied suffered a second heart attack
(D) the earliest age at which a person who smoked two packs a day had his or her first heart attack
(E) data on people who did not survive a first heart attack

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1552

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 1

Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Re: cr-heart attack [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 09:15
AK47 wrote:
Of 2,500 people who survived a first heart attack, those who did not smoke had their first heart attack at a median age of 62. However, of those 2,500, people who smoked two packs of cigarettes a day had their first heart attack at a median age of 51. On the basis of this information, it can be concluded that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.
The conclusion is incorrectly drawn from the information given because this information does not include
(A) the relative severity of heart attacks suffered by smokers and nonsmokers
(B) the nature of the different medical treatments that smokers and nonsmokers received after they had survived their first heart attack
(C) how many of the 2,500 people studied suffered a second heart attack
(D) the earliest age at which a person who smoked two packs a day had his or her first heart attack
(E) data on people who did not survive a first heart attack

The sample is exclusively composed of people who have survived their first heart attack. But the conclusion says that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.

This conclusion cannot be validated unless we survey the date of the attack for people who did not survive their 1st heart attack.

D.

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Re: cr-heart attack [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 10:39
I think you mean E! good explaination.

ncprasad wrote:
AK47 wrote:
Of 2,500 people who survived a first heart attack, those who did not smoke had their first heart attack at a median age of 62. However, of those 2,500, people who smoked two packs of cigarettes a day had their first heart attack at a median age of 51. On the basis of this information, it can be concluded that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.
The conclusion is incorrectly drawn from the information given because this information does not include
(A) the relative severity of heart attacks suffered by smokers and nonsmokers
(B) the nature of the different medical treatments that smokers and nonsmokers received after they had survived their first heart attack
(C) how many of the 2,500 people studied suffered a second heart attack
(D) the earliest age at which a person who smoked two packs a day had his or her first heart attack
(E) data on people who did not survive a first heart attack

The sample is exclusively composed of people who have survived their first heart attack. But the conclusion says that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.

This conclusion cannot be validated unless we survey the date of the attack for people who did not survive their 1st heart attack.

D.

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 1552

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 1

Location: Ann Arbor
Schools: Ross '10
Re: cr-heart attack [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 10:41
arj_singh1976 wrote:
I think you mean E! good explaination.

ncprasad wrote:
AK47 wrote:
Of 2,500 people who survived a first heart attack, those who did not smoke had their first heart attack at a median age of 62. However, of those 2,500, people who smoked two packs of cigarettes a day had their first heart attack at a median age of 51. On the basis of this information, it can be concluded that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.
The conclusion is incorrectly drawn from the information given because this information does not include
(A) the relative severity of heart attacks suffered by smokers and nonsmokers
(B) the nature of the different medical treatments that smokers and nonsmokers received after they had survived their first heart attack
(C) how many of the 2,500 people studied suffered a second heart attack
(D) the earliest age at which a person who smoked two packs a day had his or her first heart attack
(E) data on people who did not survive a first heart attack

The sample is exclusively composed of people who have survived their first heart attack. But the conclusion says that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day.

This conclusion cannot be validated unless we survey the date of the attack for people who did not survive their 1st heart attack.

D.

Oops. Of course, I meant E.

Kudos [?]: 205 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 266

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: cr-heart attack [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2007, 10:00
good explanation nc prasad.

oa is E

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Feb 2007, 09:06
Cofused and selected 'D'.

The conclusion is not severity of heart attacks but finding the avarage age.

It clearly says:

"On the basis of this information, it can be concluded that nonsmokers tend to have a first heart attack eleven years later than do people who smoke two packs of cigarettes a day"

Unless we know the number of years any person smokes 2 pack of cigarettes, it would be difficult to calculate the avarage years smoked before the 1st heart attack.

Therefore, average age of heart attack does not support the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

20 Feb 2007, 09:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# cr-heart attack

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.