Question 2
zoezhuyan wrote:
hi
u1983,
GMATNinjaTwo,
workout,
GMATNinja,
SajjadAhmad,
Gnpth and other experts,
would you please elaborate further of Q2
2. The author draws which of the following conclusions about the fact that Melville's fiction often does not possess the qualities of a Jamesian novel?
A. Literary critics should no longer use Jamesian standards to judge the value of novels.
B. Literary critics who have praised Melville's fiction at the expense of James's fiction should consider themselves justified.
C. Literary critics should no longer attempt to place writers, including Melville and James, in traditions or categories.
D. Melville and James should be viewed as different sorts of writers and one should not be regarded as inherently superior to the other.E. Melville and James nevertheless share important similarities and these should not be overlooked or slighted when literary critics point out differences between the two writers.
I struggled with C and D,
I cannot grasp the point of
one should not be regarded as inherently superior to the other, that's why I think C is better than D,
please help.
In general, it's better to get to four solid "no's" through POE rather than choosing an answer that looks better than the others. And for broad questions like question #2, your best bet is to have a solid understanding of the structure and purpose of the passage as a whole before diving into the details.
Here's a breakdown of the passage as a whole:
- The author explain how critics find fault with Melville's work: they believe that his works do not live up to the standards of fiction that have been in place since another novelist, James, arrived on the scene
- The author then argues against this critique, saying that Melville isn't a "Jamesian" novelist, and Melville's work is not actually worse than James' work -- instead, the author thinks that the two writers are just different, and so should be judged used different criteria.
- The author then goes on to explain exactly what Melville really cared about in his writing, which was different from what James cared about.
From this, it is clear that the author believes that critics were incorrect in portraying Melville as a
worse writer than James -- the two novelists just chose
different things to focus on in their works.
With that in mind, take another look at (C):
Quote:
C. Literary critics should no longer attempt to place writers, including Melville and James, in traditions or categories.
The author's argument against critics of Melville is that they tried to measure him in the SAME tradition or category as James. He/she isn't necessarily against putting authors in categories
in general -- he/she just thinks it's unfair to judge Melville as if he was in the same category as James. For this reason, (C) is out.
Quote:
D. Melville and James should be viewed as different sorts of writers and one should not be regarded as inherently superior to the other.
This aligns well with our analysis of the passage -- Melville cared about different things than James did, so they should be viewed as different kinds of writers rather than judged against one another.
Question 5
sarphant123 wrote:
hi
u1983,
GMATNinjaTwo,
workout,
GMATNinja,
SajjadAhmad,
GnpthPlease Explain Q5.
I think A too is a good option
Question #5 asks about lines 24-30 in the passage:
Quote:
It is true that Melville wrote “romances”; however, these are not the escapist fictions this word often implies, but fictions that range freely among very unusual or intense human experiences. Melville portrayed such experiences because he believed these best enabled him to explore moral questions, an exploration he assumed was the ultimate purpose of fiction.
To answer the question, we need to determine why the author includes these sentences in the passage. Taking it piece by piece:
- "It is true that Melville wrote “romances”: In the first paragraph, the critics argue that Melville was a deficient writer because because he didn't even write novels -- he only wrote romances. Here, the author agrees with part of that statement: he concedes that Melville did write romances.
- "however, these are not the escapist fictions this word often implies, but fictions that range freely among very unusual or intense human experiences." In other words, the author says that romances aren't so bad -- they're not just escapist fiction.
- "Melville portrayed such experiences because he believed these best enabled him to explore moral questions, an exploration he assumed was the ultimate purpose of fiction": Now we're getting deeper into why Melville wrote romances -- they were the best stories to get after the themes that he found to be most important in writing fiction.
Overall, the author agrees with one piece of the critics' argument, but then explains why this fact does not support their conclusion that Melville was a "deficient writer." Sure he wrote romances, but he did so for a specific reason -- so that he could explore the things that he thought were important in fiction.
So, which answer choice best describes the author's method of argumentation?
Quote:
A. The author describes an important standard of evaluation used by critics of Melville and then attacks that standard.
I suppose that the "standard of evaluation" in (A) could be the charge that Melville wrote romances, not novels. In that case, the author doesn't describe the standard of evaluation -- he/she
agrees with it.
It wouldn't make sense at this point for the author to
attack that standard of evaluation. Instead, the author
lessens the impact of the critics' point by giving further context about Melville's intentions.
Compare that to (E):
Quote:
E. The author concedes an assertion made by critics of Melville but then mitigates the weight of the assertion by means of an explanation.
The critics assert that Melville wrote romances, and the author concedes this point. But then the author argues that romances aren't inherently bad fiction -- in fact, they are the best stories to allow Melville to explore the themes most important to him. This explanation weakens the force of the critic's argument: even if Melville wrote romances, that does not make him a deficient writer.
(E) fits much better with the author's method of argumentation than (A), so (E) is the correct answer.
I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE/EA tutors @
www.gmatninja.com (
hiring!) |
YouTube |
Articles |
IG Beginners' Guides:
RC |
CR |
SC |
Complete Resource Compilations:
RC |
CR |
SC YouTube LIVE webinars:
all videos by topic +
24-hour marathon for UkraineQuestion Explanation Collections:
RC |
CR |
SC