January 21, 2019 January 21, 2019 10:00 PM PST 11:00 PM PST Mark your calendars  All GMAT Club Tests are free and open January 21st for celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday. January 22, 2019 January 22, 2019 10:00 PM PST 11:00 PM PST In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 13366
Location: United States (CA)

Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2015, 15:23
Question Stats:
62% (01:30) correct 38% (01:13) wrong based on 99 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
QUANT 4PACK SERIES Data Sufficiency Pack 3 Question 2 If gh < 0 < gk...If gh < 0 < gk, is g < 0? 1) k < h 2) 0 < h 48 Hour Window Answer & Explanation WindowEarn KUDOS! Post your answer and explanation. OA, and explanation will be posted after the 48 hour window closes. This question is part of the Quant 4Pack seriesScroll Down For Official Explanation
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/
*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****



CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2636
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Nov 2015, 16:18
EMPOWERgmatRichC wrote: QUANT 4PACK SERIES Data Sufficiency Pack 3 Question 2 If gh < 0 < gk...If gh < 0 < gk, is g < 0? 1) k < h 2) 0 < h 48 Hour Window Answer & Explanation WindowEarn KUDOS! Post your answer and explanation. OA, and explanation will be posted after the 48 hour window closes. This question is part of the Quant 4Pack seriesScroll Down For Official Explanation Given gh<0<gk > gh<gk , is g<0? Statement 1, k<h > hk>0 but as gh<gk > g(hk)< 0 > as hk>0 the only way g(hk)< 0 is for g<0, "yes" . Sufficient. Statement 2, h>0 > as gh<0 and h>0 > g<0, "yes". Sufficient. D is the correct answer.



Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 253
GPA: 3.76

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2015, 17:49
IMO D is correct'
I] k<h but gh<gk so this only possible when g<0 . Sufficient.
II] h>0 but gh<0 again this only possible when g<0
Sufficient.
So D is the correct answer.



Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 19

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2015, 01:57
Please someone correct me. This is how I approached the problem.
gh<0 implies either g or h <0 ; (h can be >0 or h <0) gk> 0 leads to scenarios : either bot g and k are > 0 or g and k are < 0
second statement was pretty simple to evaluate.
first statement : k< h ; this is possible when both k and h are positive > g has to be positive ( hence g>0) since the equality gk>0 has to be true. k<h is possible even when k< 0 , (and h< 0 or h> 0 both cases) in which case g has to be <0 for the equality gk>0 to be true. (g<0)
thus not sufficient.
where am i going wrong ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 7212

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2015, 03:12
Rk91 wrote: Please someone correct me. This is how I approached the problem.
gh<0 implies either g or h <0 ; (h can be >0 or h <0) gk> 0 leads to scenarios : either bot g and k are > 0 or g and k are < 0
second statement was pretty simple to evaluate.
first statement : k< h ; this is possible when both k and h are positive > g has to be positive ( hence g>0) since the equality gk>0 has to be true. k<h is possible even when k< 0 , (and h< 0 or h> 0 both cases) in which case g has to be <0 for the equality gk>0 to be true. (g<0)
thus not sufficient.
where am i going wrong ? hi, if k<h and both are multiplied by same number... if the number is positive, x*k<x*h.. only if we multiply both numbers by a negative number, there is a reversal of sign ie x*k>x*h so x or g here has to be a negative number since gh < 0 < gk.. now why is your reasoning flawed? why are you taking the two numbers to be positive.. both can be negative or one can be negative and other positive.. here the second is the case k is ive and h is positive and therefore their signs change when multiplied by a ive number.. hope it was helpful
_________________
1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolutemodulusabetterunderstanding210849.html#p1622372 2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html 3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effectsofarithmeticoperationsonfractions269413.html
GMAT online Tutor



Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Posts: 8
Concentration: Strategy, Finance

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2015, 04:02
Hi,
Below was my thought process.
Question stem: gh<0<gk, g<0?
Below is what I inferred from the question stem: gk>0 i.e. g,k<0 or g,k>0 gh<0 i.e. g<0, h>0 or g>0, h<0
1: k<h For statement 1 to comply with question stem (gh<0<gk) , I have to multiply on both sides with a negative value i.e. (ve mutliplier)*(k) > (ve multiplier) * (h). Therefore, g will have to be that negative multiplier. i.e. g<0. I could not think of any other way the sign will get flipped. Sufficient
2: 0< h Based on the question stem, if h>0, g<0. Sufficient
Hope this helps.
Aadi



CEO
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2636
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2015, 04:29
Rk91 wrote: Please someone correct me. This is how I approached the problem.
gh<0 implies either g or h <0 ; (h can be >0 or h <0) gk> 0 leads to scenarios : either bot g and k are > 0 or g and k are < 0
second statement was pretty simple to evaluate.
first statement : k< h ; this is possible when both k and h are positive > g has to be positive ( hence g>0) since the equality gk>0 has to be true. k<h is possible even when k< 0 , (and h< 0 or h> 0 both cases) in which case g has to be <0 for the equality gk>0 to be true. (g<0)
thus not sufficient.
where am i going wrong ? Whenever you are given variables to play with in inequalities, be very careful about your assumptions. You are given, gh<0<gk > gh<0 , 2 cases either g<0 and h>0 or g>0 and h<0 Similarly, gk>0 > g>0 k>0 and g<0 and k<0 Combine the 4 cases by keeping the sign of g as constant, you get the following 2 cases, g>0 h<0 k>0 and g<0 h>0 k<0 Now look at statement 1, h>k > you can eliminate the case g<0 h>0 k<0, thus leaving you with only 1 case of g>0 h<0 k>0, making this statement sufficient to answer the question "is g<0". Hope this helps. Statement in red above is not the correct interpretation of the given variables. Statement in green above is also not correct.



Intern
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 19

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2015, 06:12
Ohhhhk!! (lightbulb!) Now I feel so dumb!!!! Thanks a lot guys for the explanations! Really appreciate it



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 6823
GPA: 3.82

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Nov 2015, 10:54
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. If gh < 0 < gk, is g < 0? 1) k < h 2) 0 < h We can get gh<gk, or ghgk<0, or g(hk)<0에서 g<0? > hk>0?, or h>k? when we modify the question. Condition 1 answers the question 'yes' so it is sufficient, Condition 2 also gives gh<0, and when h>0, g<0 so this is also sufficient; the answer becomes (D). Once we modify the original condition and the question according to the variable approach method 1, we can solve approximately 30% of DS questions.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare The oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $149 for 3 month Online Course" "Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test" "Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 13366
Location: United States (CA)

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Nov 2015, 16:59
EMPOWERgmatRichC wrote: QUANT 4PACK SERIES Data Sufficiency Pack 3 Question 2 If gh < 0 < gk...
If gh < 0 < gk, is g < 0?
1) k < h 2) 0 < h
Hi All, This prompt is based heavily on NUMBER PROPERTY rules. As such, you can solve it by TESTing VALUES or by using Number Property Rules. Since the prompt itself starts us off with a Number Property rule, I'm going to start by breaking down those possibilities. gh < 0 < gk From this inequality, we know two things: 1) gh is NEGATIVE, so one of those variables is negative while the other is positive 2) gk is POSITIVE, so the two variables are either both negative OR both positive When combining those pieces of information, we have a limited number of outcomes... gh < 0 < gk ()(+) < 0 < ()() (+)() < 0 < (+)(+) Thus, having information about one variable will impact the rest of the other variables. We're asked if g is less than 0. This is a YES/NO question. 1) k < h From the above information, we know that k and h CANNOT be the same sign (one will be positive and the other will be negative, depending on g). Since k is LESS than h, this means that k MUST be NEGATIVE and h MUST be POSITIVE. This fits the second 'option' (above) and proves that g MUST be POSITIVE. Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS NO. Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT 2) 0 < h This Fact proves that MUST be POSITIVE. This also fits just the second 'option' (above) and proves that g MUST be POSITIVE. Thus, the answer to the question is ALWAYS NO. Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/
*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 9462

Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk...
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2018, 07:56
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources




Re: Data Sufficiency Pack 3, Question 2) If gh < 0 < gk... &nbs
[#permalink]
30 Oct 2018, 07:56






