Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:18 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
49,313
 [8]
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,313
 [8]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MayankSingh
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 289
Own Kudos:
274
 [1]
Given Kudos: 249
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V27
GMAT 2: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.9
WE:Project Management (Manufacturing)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Akarshkhan86
Joined: 21 Sep 2022
Last visit: 20 Feb 2025
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,588
Location: India
Posts: 54
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
49,313
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,313
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akarshkhan86
Hello Sajjad1994 can you share the OE of Ques 4? Thanks.

Explanation

4. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following would provide the LEAST support for the idea that surface sediment is responsible for increased concentrations of iron in the Arctic Ocean?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

The question asks for the option that would provide the least support for the idea that surface sediment is responsible for increased concentrations of iron in the Arctic Ocean.

Option (e) states: "The observation that there are higher concentrations of aluminum in the Nansen Basin than in the western Arctic."

If there are higher concentrations of aluminum in the Nansen Basin compared to the western Arctic, it actually supports the idea that surface sediment is responsible for increased iron concentrations. The passage mentions that the presence of large amounts of aluminum in the same regions as high iron values bolsters the hypothesis. Therefore, this observation of higher aluminum concentrations in the Nansen Basin would provide support for the idea, rather than being the least supportive.

Answer: E
User avatar
Prob2303
Joined: 16 May 2023
Last visit: 15 Sep 2024
Posts: 63
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 63
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Sajjad,

Can I get a brief explanation of the passage and the OE for Q1 and Q3?
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,313
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Prob2303
Hello Sajjad,

Can I get a brief explanation of the passage and the OE for Q1 and Q3?
Explanation

1. It can be inferred from the passage that an example of a detrimental effect in the highlighted text would be

Explanation

(a)
 This is the correct answer. The passage states that phytoplankton is the source of most of Earth's atmospheric oxygen and requires iron for various biochemical processes. Therefore, a lack of iron in surface waters could lead to a decrease in the supply of Earth's atmospheric oxygen.

(b) This is not the correct answer because the passage doesn't suggest a decrease in the significance of phytoplankton. It highlights the detrimental effects of a lack of iron on phytoplankton, indicating the importance of iron for their biochemical processes.

(c) This is not supported by the passage. The passage discusses the detrimental effects of low iron concentrations on phytoplankton, suggesting a potential decrease in their ability to perform biochemical processes.

(d) The passage does not provide information about an increase in the dissolution of eolian-transported continental dust. The focus is on the role of iron and its concentrations in surface waters.

(e) this is not supported by the passage. The passage emphasizes that extremely low concentrations of dissolved iron limit biological productivity in some ocean regions, suggesting that an increase in iron availability would not lead to an increase in biological productivity.

In summary, the correct answer is (a) because the passage explicitly mentions the role of phytoplankton in providing Earth's atmospheric oxygen and the detrimental effects of low iron concentrations on this process.

Answer: A
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,313
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Prob2303
Hello Sajjad,

Can I get a brief explanation of the passage and the OE for Q1 and Q3?
Explanation

3. The passage suggests which of the following about surface waters of temperate oceans?

Explanation(a) The passage does not provide information about the evenness or unevenness of iron distribution in temperate oceans. Therefore, this statement cannot be inferred from the passage.

(b) The passage does not suggest that iron was absent from temperate oceans before recent advances in analytical methodology. It mentions the dissolution of eolian-transported continental dust as a source of iron in temperate oceans.

(c) The passage mentions that in temperate and tropical oceans, iron reaches surface waters via the dissolution of eolian-transported continental dust. Therefore, if eolian activity decreased, it could lead to lower concentrations of iron in surface waters.

(d) This is not supported by the passage. The passage indicates that iron reaches surface waters through the dissolution of eolian-transported continental dust. It doesn't suggest that the direct rise of continental dust to the surface would increase iron concentrations.

(e) This is not supported by the passage. The passage discusses the hypothesis that ice-rafted sediment is a source of high iron values in the Arctic Ocean but does not suggest that temperate oceans would not contain iron if ice-rafted sediment did not melt.

Answer: C
User avatar
DangPham9625
Joined: 11 Feb 2025
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 11
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think there is something wrong in your explanation. This observation would be the least support for the idea because: the concentration in Nansen Basin is lower than western Arctic (as stated in para 2), while the idea is: more aluminum ==> higher concentration of iron. Correct me if I'm wrong
Sajjad1994


Explanation

4. It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following would provide the LEAST support for the idea that surface sediment is responsible for increased concentrations of iron in the Arctic Ocean?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

The question asks for the option that would provide the least support for the idea that surface sediment is responsible for increased concentrations of iron in the Arctic Ocean.

Option (e) states: "The observation that there are higher concentrations of aluminum in the Nansen Basin than in the western Arctic."

If there are higher concentrations of aluminum in the Nansen Basin compared to the western Arctic, it actually supports the idea that surface sediment is responsible for increased iron concentrations. The passage mentions that the presence of large amounts of aluminum in the same regions as high iron values bolsters the hypothesis. Therefore, this observation of higher aluminum concentrations in the Nansen Basin would provide support for the idea, rather than being the least supportive.

Answer: E
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
189 posts