Anshul1223333
is there a rule on 'despite' v/s 'despite the fact that' where the later is used as a dependent clause marker and the former is not.
Please clarify a bit here: is it a dependent+ independent clause construction
"despite" needs to be followed by a NOUN.
"despite the fact that", as you said here, needs to be followed by a whole sentence (clause with a subject and verb).
The decision between these two just depends on
which one you actually MEAN in context: Is something true DESPITE
some other consideration (that's represented as a noun)—or is something true DESPITE the fact THAT
the whole idea of a sentence/clause is true?
By the way... There's another type of decision, tested much more often by GMAC, that works just like this one. That's the decision between
PREPOSITION + NOUN + VERBing and
NOUN + VERB (= a COMPLETE SENTENCE).
The key realization to make is that the former construction ([PREP + NOUN + VERBing) is ultimately PREPOSITION +
NOUN, just followed by a modifier (which doesn't, and can't, change the fundamental nature of the construction to which it's attached).
If what you actually mean is the whole idea of NOUN + VERB, rather than just the noun, then this version is incorrect and you need the one with a whole clause that says NOUN + VERB instead.
Here's one official problem that contains this type of split:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/discussion-o ... 04263.htmlIn that problem, there's a split between "the possibility
of Earth getting warmer" and "whether
Earth will get warmer".
The problem with the former construction is that it's just "the possibility
of Earth" + modifier. Earth is not a possibility—the possibility under discussion is
that Earth may get warmer—so "the possibility of Earth [getting warmer]" is nonsense.
In this sentence, on the other hand, it actually makes sense to say that airline execs believe something
DESPITE A CERTAIN STATISTIC that seems to suggest that their belief is outdated. So, "despite the growing
number..." works here.