Question 3
rinkuda
Hi
GMATNinja,
Just a quick clarification here. The author in the 2nd para just states that when something is difficult, investigators do X. We have not idea if the author agrees with it or disagrees with it. He is just presenting general accepted information which might not necessarily be the authors accepted view.
I am having a tough time understanding how can i infer that the author agrees with this generally accepted view? Would really appreciate how to comprehend such languages in GMAT RC passages because we see this often. Thanks a lot.
Query pertains to this question - " With which of the following statements regarding the classification of individual species would the author most likely agree?"
Question 3 asks us which answer choice the author would "
most likely" agree with. So, we don't need something that the author EXPLICITLY agrees with in the passage. Instead, we can look for hints that
suggest the author would agree with one of the answer choices.
In the first paragraph, the author lists problems with the biological species concept. In the second paragraph, the author tells us how "some investigators" overcome these problems using the phenotype instead.
When explaining how the phenotype concept fixes the issues with the biological species concept, the author says that "two groups that have evolved separately are
likely to display measurable differences," and that "if the distribution of measurements from one group does not overlap with those of another, the two groups might
reasonably be considered distinct species."
By using the words "likely" and "reasonably" in describing the phenotype method, the author seems to think that it DOES, in fact, address some of the issues with the other definition. So, we can say that the author would
likely agree that "phenotype comparison may help to classify species when application of the biological species concept proves inconclusive."
(A) is the correct answer to question 3.
I hope that helps!