waytowharton
GMATNinja KarishmaB mikemcgarry ChrisLele ExpertsGlobal5Would option E be incorrect, if we had scientists instead of that?
Modified option E - Digging in sediments in northern China, scientists have gathered evidence which suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than "SCIENTISTS" previously thought.
I am not clear whether option E has pronoun error or some other error. Is the comparison correct phrase(much earlier emergence of complex life-forms) is compared with clause(scientists previously thought)?
Thanks in advance!
No, option (E) is not good and the replacement you suggested will only make it worse. Option (C) is clean, clear and precise.
Note that the verb 'suggest' takes an object. Often, it is a 'that clause'.
He suggested that we should ...
Else, it could take a noun/pronoun.
Please suggest a song...
(E) ... scientists have gathered evidence which suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than that previously thought.
It is better to use 'that' with a defining clause, not 'which'.
What does 'that' refer to? It has to refer to a noun so perhaps it refers to 'emergence'. But it still doesn't make any sense if we write 'suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms than emergence previously thought'.
If instead, 'that' were to refer to 'scientists', we would get a clause 'scientists previously thought' being compared with a noun 'much earlier emergence'.
After 'suggests', we need a 'that clause' to explain what the evidence suggests because we need to compare the time of emergence (emerged earlier than previously thought). So it is best to give the verb and then compare. A verb requires a clause.
Hence, (C)'s that clause: '... suggesting that A emerged much earlier than previously thought' works well.
If there were no comparison or the comparison were implied, it would be acceptable e.g.
(E) ... scientists have gathered evidence that suggests a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms.