ArupRS
anud33p
benejo
Disappointed by the company’s decision to put itself for sale,
its shares were quickly sold by the investors, voicing their frustration.
A. its shares were quickly sold by the investors, voicing their frustration
B. investors voiced their frustration, quickly selling the company's shares
C. investors quickly sold its shares and voiced their frustration
D. investors quickly sold its shares, voicing their frustration
E. investors quickly sold their shares and voiced their frustration
Source:
ExpertsGlobalcc
daagh,
AjiteshArunCould someone please explain why B is wrong? Was stuck between B & D.
quickly selling the company's shares describes how the investors voiced their frustration. verb+ing modifiers can serve as adverbial modifiers by providing more information.
Found it extremely hard to choose between B & D. D also made sense, effectively reading it as ~ investors voiced their frustration by selling the shares. The reason I picked B over D was I thought D had some ambiguity - their could refer to shares as well. Clearly I was wrong.
generis,
daagh and
AjiteshArunI also have the same doubt. Here voicing and selling two things are happening. One is the result of another. How to understand this?
Normally investors voice their frustration by selling the shares. I don't think it is another way around. Please explain and provide your suggestion.
Regards,
Arup
ArupRS , two final items:
their and
common metaphorical construction • THEIR
The only logical antecedent is
investors.Shares cannot have frustration or be frustrated. Ever.
GMAC occasionally uses sentences in which inanimate things perform actions that require conscious intent.
"A treatise that argued . . ."
In those questions, GMAC reflects language changes; in certain cases, it has become standard to allow a thing to perform an intent-based action.
By contrast, GMAC never uses sentences in which inanimate things have
emotions or express emotions.
Shares of stock cannot
feel frustration [i.e. frustration that might be expressed by investors].
Shares cannot
express frustration, either.
The
only logical antecedent is investors.
Answer D is fine. (I am not sure whether this part bothered you, but if it did not, perhaps others will benefit.)
• the metaphorical constructTo voice is not literal in this kind of question.
In English, metaphor is common, though we do not see much use of metaphor on the GMAT.
One major difference between B and D is that D correctly captures a common use of metaphor in English.
subject + deed =
metaphorical expression of result captured by comma + ING
BY selling their shares, the investors "voiced" their frustration.
The act of selling came first. That act had the effect of metaphorically "voicing" the investors' frustration.
The investors did not actually utter a word. They "spoke" with action.
As is this question's sentence, this sentence is metaphorical:
Outraged by the university's continuous mishandling of rape cases, about 10 percent of the students transferred immediately, voting with their feet and advertising their anger.
What were the students "voting" on? No election or referendum was actually happening.
The students were deciding whether to attend and pay money to a school that mishandled rape cases.
Leaving the school resulted in their "voting" with their feet
and in their "advertising" their anger: the students let the university know that they found its actions intolerable.
This metaphorical usage is fairly common, and its pattern is predictable.
-- Persons ABC do XYZ, and in doing XYZ, ABCs metaphorically express or do something else.
The deed XYZ happens first.
The deed then "expresses," or becomes emblematic of, some state of mind or affairs.
The investors sold shares of the company's stock, [thereby] voicing their frustration.-- A comma before a present participle phrase often signals that the ___ING word expresses the effect or result of the previous clause.
-- That signal is at work in this case, too: comma + verbING = metaphorical result/effect of previous clause
Another example:
Wary of the high rate of unemployment among lawyers, she chose an expensive Ivy League law school, buying herself options and opportunities.-- Is she really purchasing anything? No. There is a metaphorical "barter" or exchange going on, though.)
-- She chose an Ivy League law school [deed first]. That choice "bought" [gave] her options and opportunities.
Another example:
Apparently undeterred by basic civility, the leader made appalling decisions and issued offensive statements, loudly announcing what some specialists called his "unmitigated narcissism."The leader is not actually announcing his unmitigated narcissism.
His
deeds have the effect of "announcing" what experts say is a personality disorder.
Metaphorically "announcing" a psychological disorder is the result of actions in the previous clause.
• Option B
At best, Option B loses the logic and should be rewritten with verbs of equal weight.
To my native ear, B sounds almost like a comma splice.
B.
investors voiced their frustration, quickly selling the company's sharesNo reason exists to use the participle phrase as a "contemporaneous action" modifier. Time sequence in B?
The investors are disappointed with the company. The investors voice their frustration, literally. They say something.
At the same time, they sell their shares.
B sounds similar to E (and in fact probably should look like E).
in B, "quickly selling shares" is at best a contemporaneous action.
-- Logically, selling shares does not result from investors having spoken about frustration.
-- Investors sold shares not because they
voiced frustration.
-- They sold shares because they
were frustrated. In that case, the verb phrases should be parallel or at least on equal par, as in E.