It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 19:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a

Author Message
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Florida
Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 18:50
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:48) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a ring of stones thousands of years ago in Britain were knowledgeable about celestial
events. The ground for this claim is that two of the stones determine a line pointing directly to the position of the sun at sunrise at the spring equinox. There are many stones in the ring, however, so the chance that one pair will point in a celestially significant direction is large. Therefore, the people who built the ring were not knowledgeable about celestial events.

Which one of the following is an error of reasoning in Dobsonâ€™s argument?

(A) The failure of cited evidence to establish a statement is taken as evidence that that statement is false.
(B) Dobsonâ€™s conclusion logically contradicts some of the evidence presented in support of it.
(C) Statements that absolutely establish Dobsonâ€™s conclusion are treated as if they merely give some support to that conclusion.
(D) Something that is merely a matter of opinion is treated as if it were subject to verification as a matter of fact.
(E) Dobsonâ€™s drawing the conclusion relies on interpreting a key term in two different ways.
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574
Location: San Jose, CA
Re: CR - Dobson - good one [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jul 2004, 19:02
Will go with A on this one.
cited evidence: stones pointing to the sun
statement: Were those people knowledgeable about celestial events?
Because the evidence is not convincing enuf to prove that they were knowledgeable, the author concludes that they were not knowledgeable.
This is exactly stated in A
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400
Location: India

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2004, 01:49
BY POE, (A) is best.

(Don't ask me the time I took for this!! I guess it was 2+ mins)
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2004, 05:54

Dobson can see the flaw in historians claim and is of the opinion that there is nothing unique about two stones out of number of them pointing to the sun. In the same breadth Dobson is also incorrect as he assumes that a pair pointing the sun is not unique - can very well be unique.

Hence A.
26 Jul 2004, 05:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Reviewer: Many historians claim, in their own treatment of 5 14 Mar 2011, 17:43
People who discontinue regular exercise typically claim that 9 25 Jan 2011, 08:25
Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a 5 13 Mar 2010, 13:20
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious 0 27 Jun 2008, 13:53
Source: 1000CR) Kim: Some people claim that the 6 02 Jul 2007, 10:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by