Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:50 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
DHAR
Joined: 15 Dec 2015
Last visit: 13 Dec 2021
Posts: 92
Own Kudos:
928
 [10]
Given Kudos: 83
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 92
Kudos: 928
 [10]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
gvvsnraju@1
Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Last visit: 09 Dec 2018
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Given Kudos: 83
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 48
Kudos: 19
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pradeepmaria
Joined: 11 May 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2021
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 21
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GPA: 3.44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
GMATaspirant641
Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Last visit: 13 Feb 2022
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 11
Kudos: 95
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think the answer should be E.

the question asks us to check if -4ab is negative.

(1): 16a + b > 0

16(1) + 2 > 0; 16(1) - 2 > 0; 16(-1) + 17 > 0

SO, Not sufficient

(2) a>0. Nothing about b. So, -4ab can be positive or negative. Not sufficient.

(1) + (2): Still not sufficient since b can be + or -.

Ans: E.

Bunuel, please let us know if this approach is correct.
avatar
ArupRS
Joined: 23 Jan 2018
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V36 (Online)
Posts: 254
Kudos: 248
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u, Bunuel

Dear experts: Please check if C is the correct answer. I think E should be the answer.

Regards,
Arup
avatar
smlprkh
Joined: 13 Jun 2018
Last visit: 23 Apr 2019
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 50
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Posts: 34
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1: 16a + b > 0

Both a and b are unknown and thus, insufficient

Statement 2: a > 0

This tells us ax^2 is always positive, however b could be negative. Insufficient

Both 1 and 2 together:

16a + b is positive and that 16a is positive.

B could be positive, no intersection or B could be a large negative number which could give us 1 or 2 intersections. Therefore insufficient.

E
User avatar
KanishkM
Joined: 09 Mar 2018
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
Posts: 759
Kudos: 503
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATaspirant641
I think the answer should be E.

the question asks us to check if -4ab is negative.

(1): 16a + b > 0

16(1) + 2 > 0; 16(1) - 2 > 0; 16(-1) + 17 > 0

SO, Not sufficient

(2) a>0. Nothing about b. So, -4ab can be positive or negative. Not sufficient.

(1) + (2): Still not sufficient since b can be + or -.

Ans: E.

Bunuel, please let us know if this approach is correct.

Hey GMATaspirant641

After combining when we use a>0 in 16a + b > 0, both cases will be valid, b can be <0 or b can be > 0

*Editing it*

Now if -4ab < 0

This means that determinant can be greater than 0 or less than 0

Giving answer as ,rightly mentioned in previous posts, E
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,989
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,989
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Two posts above suggest that these inequalities:

16a + b > 0
a > 0

imply that b > 0. That is not the case, as you can see by plugging in numbers: we might have a = 1 and b = -1, for example.

If our parabola is y = ax^2 + b, then when a is positive, the parabola (a U shape) opens upwards, and if a is negative, the parabola opens downwards (an upside-down U shape). The value of b is the y-intercept of the parabola. Using both statements here, we know the parabola opens upwards, because a > 0, and we know that when x=4, the parabola is above the x-axis. But that still leaves two possibilities: maybe the parabola has a y-intercept that is above the origin (b > 0), and lies entirely above the x-axis (e.g. in the parabola y = x^2 + 1) or maybe it starts at or below the x-axis (b < 0), crosses the x-axis in one or two places, and becomes positive by the time x = 4 (e.g. in the parabola y = x^2 - 1, which clearly has two x-intercepts at 1 and -1). So the answer is E.

If the source is claiming the answer is C here, then I'd suggest working with more reliable study materials.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts