Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 27 Sep 2026, 02:08 |
It is currently 27 Sep 2026, 02:08 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 2701:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Sep 2807:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 28, 2026 - Oct. 16, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Sep 2911:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
" Description: Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thur Sept. 29, 2026 - Dec. 3, 2026, 11:00am-1:00pm EST
Oct 0102:00 AM EDT
-03:00 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.
Oct 0107:00 AM BST
-08:00 AM GMT
Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event for Top MBA Programs! Buy tickets - Virtual series that’s all set to equip you to -excel in your MBA interviews.
Oct 0301:00 PM EDT
-04:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays Oct. 3, 2026 - Dec. 26, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm EST
28 Sep 2019, 14:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
38% (01:52) correct
62%
(01:45)
wrong
based on 605
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils.
A) Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
B) The oldest reliably dated human fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey in Tanzania, dating to 3.75 million years ago
C) The teeth and jawbones found in Tanzania by Dr. Mary Leakey and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
D) In Tanzania, the teeth and jawbones found by Dr. Mary Leakey date to 3.75 million years ago and are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
E) In Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils, found by Dr. Mary Leakey
28 Sep 2019, 14:49
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
• HIGHLIGHTS
• Although the coupling is not common on the GMAT, a past participle and a present participle can be parallel.
Both found and dating to are participial adjectives. They modify the nouns teeth and jawbones. See the notes below.
• "Date to" is idiomatic. HERE is an official question in which "date to" is used.
THE PROMPT
THE OPTIONS
• they might be ambiguous. Logically I think it can mean only "teeth and jawbones," but the sentence would be better without any hint of ambiguity.
Eliminate A
• we might be able to argue that "dating to 3.75 million years ago" modifies the whole previous clause
-- "dating to 3.75 millions years ago" might qualify as "extra information" about the clause, but that logic is a stretch. "Dating to XXX" refers to fossils and does not tell us anything about "fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey.
-- although GMAC frequent uses present participles (verbINGs) as clause modifiers, remember that participles are often adjectives.
• passive voice? Passive voice is often correct on the GMAT.
• the sentence is more descriptive with "teeth and jawbones" included; three other options have that detail.
KEEP, but look for a better option
-- common linking verbs are is, become, and seem. These verbs connect the subject to additional information about the subject.
-- the thing on the other side of the linking verb is called a subject complement,
• present and past participles found and dating are parallel as a matter of logic. Both are adjectives that describe teeth and jawbones. See below.
• the active voice probably does not make that much difference, but it's a slight bonus
-- The verbs date and are are parallel, but the verb date follows the past participle, found, (are you dizzy yet?) an arrangement that is not as clear as that in C
• In Tanzania suggests that the fossils are the oldest in Tanzania. At the least the issue is not clear.
Introductory prepositional phrases are very versatile. They do not have to modify the subject of the subsequent clause.
-- Compare:
In Tibet and Nepal, Mt. Everest measures almost 30,000 feet and is the tallest mountain. (Everest is the tallest mountain in Tibet and Nepal)
Mt. Everest in Tibet and Nepal measures almost 30,000 feet and is the tallest mountain. (Everest is the the tallest mountain in the world)
Eliminate D
-- The sentence is scrambled. Compared to (C), option E is not as clear
-- The inverted structure (verb → subject) is cumbersome; again, compared to (C), there is no reason to put the verb "are" before the subject "oldest fossils."
-- The introductory descriptors are both adjectives but are a little strange compared to (C): located in Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago would be better.
-- "teeth and jawbones" are not present; the sentence would be more descriptive if it included them
-- Grammatical but not as effective or clear as C
Eliminate E
Option B v. Option C? Option C wins.
Option C places dating close to its noun, is not in passive voice, and includes "teeth and jawbones."
The answer is C
• NOTES
Found and dating are parallel
-- In C, two qualities describe the compound subject teeth and jawbones: found in Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago
-- See this SC Butler question, here, from just a few days ago, in which [SPOILER ALERT] I link to an official question. If you click the spoiler, you know the answer to an official question. That question is
As I wrote in my other post, parallelism is grounded in logic. If logic requires different participles, grammar adapts.
Although the pairing of past and present participles is not common on the GMAT, that pairing is also allowed—as it should be.
In good prose, that pairing is fairly common.
COMMENTS
exliontamer , welcome to SC Butler.
This question is hard. Errors are not "slam dunk" and obvious.
We have one job: find the four worst answers, make sure the remaining answer is grammatical, mark that answer, and move on.
We are not looking for the best possible or perfect option. We are looking for the best option of five.
In this case, that option is straightforward and well-written, but sometimes "best of five" will seem to be a not-great sentence.
Everyone who took this on and explained gets kudos, even if a person relied on a bad assumption and did not reach the right conclusion.
I have watched critical reasoning skills improve markedly in the last few months.
Nice work.
Project SC Butler: Day 170: Sentence Correction (SC2)
• HIGHLIGHTS
• Although the coupling is not common on the GMAT, a past participle and a present participle can be parallel.
Both found and dating to are participial adjectives. They modify the nouns teeth and jawbones. See the notes below.
• "Date to" is idiomatic. HERE is an official question in which "date to" is used.
THE PROMPT
Quote:
THE OPTIONS
Quote:
• a present participle (verbING) without a comma (dating) modifies the immediately preceding noun Tanzania and produces nonsense. Tanzania is not dated to 3.75 million years ago.
• they might be ambiguous. Logically I think it can mean only "teeth and jawbones," but the sentence would be better without any hint of ambiguity.
Eliminate A
Quote:
• dating to 3.75 million years ago is a noun modifier of "human fossils" and should be placed as closely as possible to the noun
• we might be able to argue that "dating to 3.75 million years ago" modifies the whole previous clause
-- "dating to 3.75 millions years ago" might qualify as "extra information" about the clause, but that logic is a stretch. "Dating to XXX" refers to fossils and does not tell us anything about "fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey.
-- although GMAC frequent uses present participles (verbINGs) as clause modifiers, remember that participles are often adjectives.
• passive voice? Passive voice is often correct on the GMAT.
• the sentence is more descriptive with "teeth and jawbones" included; three other options have that detail.
KEEP, but look for a better option
Quote:
• This sentence is clear: subject + two adjectives (found . . and dating . . .), a linking verb, and a subject complement
-- common linking verbs are is, become, and seem. These verbs connect the subject to additional information about the subject.
-- the thing on the other side of the linking verb is called a subject complement,
• present and past participles found and dating are parallel as a matter of logic. Both are adjectives that describe teeth and jawbones. See below.
• the active voice probably does not make that much difference, but it's a slight bonus
Quote:
• this sentence is hard to read. And is a parallelism marker.
-- The verbs date and are are parallel, but the verb date follows the past participle, found, (are you dizzy yet?) an arrangement that is not as clear as that in C
• In Tanzania suggests that the fossils are the oldest in Tanzania. At the least the issue is not clear.
Introductory prepositional phrases are very versatile. They do not have to modify the subject of the subsequent clause.
-- Compare:
In Tibet and Nepal, Mt. Everest measures almost 30,000 feet and is the tallest mountain. (Everest is the tallest mountain in Tibet and Nepal)
Mt. Everest in Tibet and Nepal measures almost 30,000 feet and is the tallest mountain. (Everest is the the tallest mountain in the world)
Eliminate D
Quote:
[/quote]
-- The sentence is scrambled. Compared to (C), option E is not as clear
-- The inverted structure (verb → subject) is cumbersome; again, compared to (C), there is no reason to put the verb "are" before the subject "oldest fossils."
-- The introductory descriptors are both adjectives but are a little strange compared to (C): located in Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago would be better.
-- "teeth and jawbones" are not present; the sentence would be more descriptive if it included them
-- Grammatical but not as effective or clear as C
Eliminate E
Option B v. Option C? Option C wins.
Option C places dating close to its noun, is not in passive voice, and includes "teeth and jawbones."
The answer is C
• NOTES
Found and dating are parallel
-- In C, two qualities describe the compound subject teeth and jawbones: found in Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago
-- See this SC Butler question, here, from just a few days ago, in which [SPOILER ALERT] I link to an official question. If you click the spoiler, you know the answer to an official question. That question is
here. In that official question, the past participle spawned and present participle extending are parallel.
As I wrote in my other post, parallelism is grounded in logic. If logic requires different participles, grammar adapts.
Although the pairing of past and present participles is not common on the GMAT, that pairing is also allowed—as it should be.
In good prose, that pairing is fairly common.
COMMENTS
exliontamer , welcome to SC Butler.
This question is hard. Errors are not "slam dunk" and obvious.
We have one job: find the four worst answers, make sure the remaining answer is grammatical, mark that answer, and move on.
We are not looking for the best possible or perfect option. We are looking for the best option of five.
In this case, that option is straightforward and well-written, but sometimes "best of five" will seem to be a not-great sentence.
Everyone who took this on and explained gets kudos, even if a person relied on a bad assumption and did not reach the right conclusion.
I have watched critical reasoning skills improve markedly in the last few months.
Nice work.
General Discussion
28 Sep 2019, 20:42
Kudos
Bookmarks
Imo. C
Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils[/u].
A) Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils - ing form without comma refers to the preceding word. Hence this option is incorrect.
B) The oldest reliably dated human fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey in Tanzania, dating to 3.75 million years ago - ing form immediately after comma (dating as an effect) usually refers to preceding action words, I.e. were found. Hence its incorrect.
C) The teeth and jawbones found in Tanzania by Dr. Mary Leakey and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils - Subject verb agreement and parallelism error
D) In Tanzania, the teeth and jawbones found by Dr. Mary Leakey date to 3.75 million years ago and are the oldest reliably dated human fossils - Maintained subject verb agreement & parallelism. Hold it.
E) In Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils, found by Dr. Mary Leakey - Subject verb agreement error & parallelism error.
Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils[/u].
A) Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils - ing form without comma refers to the preceding word. Hence this option is incorrect.
B) The oldest reliably dated human fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey in Tanzania, dating to 3.75 million years ago - ing form immediately after comma (dating as an effect) usually refers to preceding action words, I.e. were found. Hence its incorrect.
C) The teeth and jawbones found in Tanzania by Dr. Mary Leakey and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils - Subject verb agreement and parallelism error
D) In Tanzania, the teeth and jawbones found by Dr. Mary Leakey date to 3.75 million years ago and are the oldest reliably dated human fossils - Maintained subject verb agreement & parallelism. Hold it.
E) In Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils, found by Dr. Mary Leakey - Subject verb agreement error & parallelism error.
28 Sep 2019, 21:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils.
A) Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
"dating" modifies Tanzania? and they refers to jawbones or teeth and jawbones, no clear reference
B) The oldest reliably dated human fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey in Tanzania, dating to 3.75 million years ago
what is dating modifying? Tanzania and there is no mention of teeth and jawbones
C) The teeth and jawbones found in Tanzania by Dr. Mary Leakey and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
the teeth and jawbones found and dating to ,,,are -> looks good
D) In Tanzania, the teeth and jawbones found by Dr. Mary Leakey date to 3.75 million years ago and are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
this option changes the meaning, the teeth and jawbones are oldest reliably dated human fossils in tanzania
E) In Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils, found by Dr. Mary Leakey
parallelism is not correct in this , In tanzania and dating to - are not parallel.
C is the answer!
A) Dr. Mary Leakey found teeth and jawbones in Tanzania dating to 3.75 million years ago, and they are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
"dating" modifies Tanzania? and they refers to jawbones or teeth and jawbones, no clear reference
B) The oldest reliably dated human fossils were found by Dr. Mary Leakey in Tanzania, dating to 3.75 million years ago
what is dating modifying? Tanzania and there is no mention of teeth and jawbones
C) The teeth and jawbones found in Tanzania by Dr. Mary Leakey and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
the teeth and jawbones found and dating to ,,,are -> looks good
D) In Tanzania, the teeth and jawbones found by Dr. Mary Leakey date to 3.75 million years ago and are the oldest reliably dated human fossils
this option changes the meaning, the teeth and jawbones are oldest reliably dated human fossils in tanzania
E) In Tanzania and dating to 3.75 million years ago are the oldest reliably dated human fossils, found by Dr. Mary Leakey
parallelism is not correct in this , In tanzania and dating to - are not parallel.
C is the answer!
Not sure but seems strange to me
