Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 18:59 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 18:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
shikhar
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Last visit: 26 May 2013
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
1,132
 [51]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 81
Kudos: 1,132
 [51]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
34
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
anordinaryguy
Joined: 28 May 2011
Last visit: 18 Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
161
 [6]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 109
Kudos: 161
 [6]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [5]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sleepynut
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2017
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
92
 [2]
Given Kudos: 905
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Posts: 162
Kudos: 92
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi all,
I agree that option E is the best of all.However,what are "ideological positions" mentioned in this choice?
This is an inference question,and there is no other information which states that there are some other factor apart from "disposable personal income per capita" which can affect the election as well.We know that A causes B;how can we conclude that there something apart from C,which is A,causes B
What am I missing?
avatar
Rohit23
Joined: 13 Dec 2018
Last visit: 12 Apr 2019
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GPA: 3.94
Posts: 37
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Argument says :
increase in disposable personal income impacts results of presidential elections. So it can be safely conclude Ideological position of the candidate is not the only thing that impacts the result of presidential election. Choice E precisely does the same. Hence, E is the answer.
User avatar
mba20202022
Joined: 04 Apr 2018
Last visit: 02 Jan 2022
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
23
 [2]
Given Kudos: 405
Posts: 52
Kudos: 23
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone explain why the answer is not A?
I get the rational of E, but why can't we infer that an incumbent is likely (i.e. has high probability) to win when running for office?
We are told that only one incumbent lost since 1952, can't we infer that the probability of an incumbent to win is thus "likely"?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [4]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mba20202022
First, a broad principle: inference questions are asking for something that is definitely true based on what we've read. So in general, be careful about any answer that tries to predict the future based on past trends. Any such prediction relies on the assumption "If things go like before . . ."

As for the particulars of this case, notice that we were never told that only this one incumbent lost. We're told that 1952 was the only election year that saw a drop in disposable income. We don't know how much of a rise (if any) occurred in other elections, so we don't know how big an edge the incumbents developed, and we certainly don't know anything about who won.
User avatar
Masterclass_Space
Joined: 05 Jan 2024
Last visit: 26 Feb 2024
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 29
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Each increase of 1 percent in real disposable personal income per capita will increase the share of the electorate for an incumbent by about 2.2 percentage points, other things being equal. Since 1952 there has been a decline in real disposable income during only one presidential election year. The incumbent lost that election.
Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?
(A) When an incumbent runs for office, he or she is likely to win. (Incorrect: no relevance)
premise is about income increase and decrease hence conclusion should be linked with winning + Income

(B) Political parties should take care to put forth a candidate who seems prosperous. (Incorrect: out of scope)
What the party should do does not matter. It should be about income plus winning possibility

(C) Presidential candidates should put their greatest efforts into improving their public image. (Incorrect: extra premise)
The premise cannot become a conclusion

(D) Because a presidential campaign requires the expenditure of large amounts of money, it frequently impoverishes a candidate and his or her supporters. (Incorrect: assumption)
Based on premise, it is assumed however inference means to conclude based on premise

(E) The outcome of a presidential election is substantially affected by factors other than the ideological positions of the candidates. (correct option)
To conclude, it needs at least two premises. This option includes both hence the best option
User avatar
Azakura16
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 12 Mar 2025
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (AR)
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90
GPA: 3.5
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 805 Q90 V90 DI90
Posts: 59
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Each increase of 1 percent in real disposable personal income per capita will increase the share of the electorate for an incumbent by about 2.2 percentage points, other things being equal. Since 1952 there has been a decline in real disposable income during only one presidential election year. The incumbent lost that election.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?


(A) When an incumbent runs for office, he or she is likely to win.

(B) Political parties should take care to put forth a candidate who seems prosperous.

(C) Presidential candidates should put their greatest efforts into improving their public image.

(D) Because a presidential campaign requires the expenditure of large amounts of money, it frequently impoverishes a candidate and his or her supporters.

(E) The outcome of a presidential election is substantially affected by factors other than the ideological positions of the candidates

Fact 1: Each increase of 1% in real disposable personal income per capita will increase the share of the electorate for an incumbent by about 2.2 percentage points, all else equal.
Fact 2: Since 1952 there has been a decline in real disposable income during only one presidential election year, and the incumbent lost that election.

We’re looking for an inference.
A. Not supported. In fact, the only incumbent mentioned specifically lost their reelection.
B. Not supported. No candidate personal traits are mentioned.
C. Not supported. They don’t bring up personal image at all.
D. Not supported. Nothing is said about the expenses of the candidates.
E. Supported. The % increase in real disposable income isn’t an ideological position of the candidate, but it affects the election outcome.
Best answer is E.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts