Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Join the live F2F session with the Admission Directors from Rotman School of Management and Ivey Business School to find out why Canada is increasingly becoming the go-to destination for several MBA aspirants, and gain critical insights....
A live session in which Greg Guglielmo, Haas MBA & Founder of Avanti Prep, analyses resumes of MBA applicants, and suggests ways of improvement in one on one talk with concerned applicants.
Leadership is one of the most important characteristics schools look for in applicants. This session will help define exactly what leadership is and how you can best showcase it in your essays.
Start by taking a free, full-length practice test—at your convenience. Receive a detailed score analysis to understand your strengths and see where you need to improve.
GMAT tests your ability to think critically by presenting "tricky" arguments that require you to notice flaws or vulnerabilities in the construct. e-GMAT is conducting a free webinar in which you can learn the art to decode difficult CR questions.
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Sep 2015, 07:36
20
31
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
5% (low)
Question Stats:
85% (01:45) correct 15% (02:19) wrong based on 1524 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company, or both. If 62 percent of those who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees, what percent were stockholders who were not employees?
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2015, 04:11
11
8
Bunuel wrote:
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company, or both. If 62 percent of those who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees, what percent were stockholders who were not employees?
(A) 34% (B) 38% (C) 45% (D) 53% (E) 62%
Kudos for a correct solution.
Answer: Option D
Check the steps below
Attachments
File comment: ww.GMATinsight.com
Sol 2.jpg [ 97.81 KiB | Viewed 16006 times ]
_________________
Prepare with PERFECTION to claim Q≥50 and V≥40 !!! GMATinsight .............(Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha) e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com l Call : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772 One-on-One Skype classes l Classroom Coaching l On-demand Quant course l Admissions Consulting
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Sep 2015, 08:48
20
7
ske wrote:
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company, or both. If 62 percent of those who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees, what percent were stockholders who were not employees?
(A) 34% (B) 38% (C) 45% (D) 53% (E) 62%
Let M represent the number of meeting attendees. Then, since 62% of M or 0.62M were stockholders and 47% of M or 0.47M were employees, it follows that 0.62M + 0.47M = 1.09M were either stockholders, employees, or both. Since 1.09M exceeds M, the excess 1.09M − M = 0.09M must be the number of attendees who were both stockholders and employees, leaving the rest 0.62M − 0.09M = 0.53M, or 53%, of the meeting attendees to be stockholders but not employees.
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Oct 2015, 08:50
9
2
Bunuel wrote:
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company, or both. If 62 percent of those who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees, what percent were stockholders who were not employees?
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Mar 2017, 21:05
1
suppose stockholder in the company = s employee in the company = e both = b as per question => s + b = 62 => e + b = 47 then stockholder in the company + employee in the company - both = 100% (s+b) + (e+b) -b = 100 => b =9 now stockholders who were not employees => (s + b) - b => 62 -9 => 53
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Jan 2018, 12:30
Hi All,
This is essentially an Overlapping Sets question that does not have a "neither" group. As such, it can be solved in a couple of different ways. Here's how you can use standard Overlapping Sets formula to get to the correct answer:
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Sep 2018, 13:47
1
Top Contributor
Bunuel wrote:
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company, or both. If 62 percent of those who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees, what percent were stockholders who were not employees?
(A) 34% (B) 38% (C) 45% (D) 53% (E) 62%
Kudos for a correct solution.
Let's use the Double Matrix Method. This technique can be used for most questions featuring a population in which each member has two characteristics associated with it (aka overlapping sets questions).
Here, we have a population of attendees, and the two characteristics are: - stockholder or not a stockholder - employee or not an employee
Since we're not told the total number of attendees, and since we're trying to find a PERCENTAGE, let's assign a nice value to the total number of attendees Let's say there are 100 attendees
Finally, since we're looking for the percentage of attendees who were stockholders but NOT employees, let's place a red star in that box to remind us of what we're trying to determine.
62 percent of those who attended the meeting were stockholders This also means that the other 38 percent are NOT stockholders
47 percent were employees This also means that the other 53 percent are NOT employees
At this point, we appear to have no more information to add to our diagram. However, we also know that each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company, or both This means that there were ZERO people who were neither a stockholder nor an employee. So, we can add this to our diagram.
Since the two boxes in the right-hand column must add to 53, we know that the top right box must have 53 people in it...
What percent were stockholders who were not employees? Out of 100 attendees, 53 people were stockholders but not employees In other words, 53% of the people were stockholders but not employees
Answer: D
This question type is VERY COMMON on the GMAT, so be sure to master the technique.
To learn more about the Double Matrix Method, watch this video:
_________________
If you enjoy my solutions, you'll love my GMAT prep course.
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Dec 2018, 07:23
1
I feel the answer can be arrived really quick. Given the earlier condition, % employee are 47% so % not employees (means stockholders) = 53% (100-47) which is the answer. Correct me if I'm wrong with my approach.
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Mar 2020, 07:50
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________