bkpolymers1617To me this is quite straightforward.
Were you able to get the discrepancy here?
Although the film received rave reviews, the viewing pattern did not change in "few Major cities".
This was supported by the fact that " low number of movie goers went to watch the movie"
In other words, Movie watchers were not influenced by the good review of the movie.But it was observed in the later few weeks that movie picked its pace and became a hit : supporting fact : movie ticket's sale increased
so what could be the reason here ? why did the movie became hit if the reviews were not taken seriously in the first hand?
So the new information which A brings is the filling logic which we need here to make both the statement correct standing tall with the conclusion
less sale in few major cities + good sales in other cities = high number of tickets sale.
lets see E - what is it doing?
Many respected bloggers wrote about seeing and enjoying the movie, beginning about two months after its release
But doesn't it tell the same thing what we already know - we already know that the movie has received good reviews , but movie watchers are not basing their judgement at the back of these review? didn't the pattern tell us that : it's not a new info
In other words, Movie watchers were not influenced by the good review of the movie.