GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Jan 2019, 09:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### GMAT Club Tests are Free & Open for Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday!

January 21, 2019

January 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Mark your calendars - All GMAT Club Tests are free and open January 21st for celebrate Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday.

# Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 143
Location: Manchester UK

### Show Tags

Updated on: 24 Dec 2018, 08:40
25
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (01:24) correct 29% (01:30) wrong based on 990 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Project CR Butler:Day 49:Critical Reasoning (CR2)

Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.

Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.

Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?

(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 28
Page: 505

Spoiler: :: OE
Because E indicates that the number of commercials in a cluster is increasing, it entails that proportionally more commercials are aired in intermediate positions. Hence, E helps fact 2 explain fact 1 by showing that increasingly more commercials are aired in positions in which viewers find them difficult to recall. E is the best answer.

A testifies to the ineffectiveness of television advertising but does not help fact 2 explain fact 1. B indicates that fact 2 contradicts rather than explains fact 1, since it suggests that the number of commercials per cluster is decreasing. C and D help to explain fact 1-by describing a change in viewing habits and a change in programming-but neither relates fact 2 to fact 1.

Originally posted by sagarsabnis on 07 Jan 2010, 13:30.
Last edited by gmat1393 on 24 Dec 2018, 08:40, edited 3 times in total.
Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2007
Posts: 77
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jan 2010, 15:03
6
1
sagarsabnis wrote:
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?
(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.

This supports fact 1. It doesn't do anything for fact 2.

(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.

If the total time is decreasing, then the chances of brand name commercials being in the middle is less. Does not support.

(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.

Out of scope. Doesn't explain/support how brand names are not being recalled with their position in the cluster.

(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.

if there are more clusters, then theres more chances for viewers to catch the first or last commercial in the cluster which could be brand names. Does not support

(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

if the number of commercials in a cluster is increasing, then the chances for brand names to be in the middle is greater. This supports fact 2. Pick E

_________________

If you like my post, a kudos is always appreciated

##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 47
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2010, 03:12
if more commercials are aired people will recall lesser % of commercials aired. so E is the only one that impacts this.

hence E

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Schools: Wake Forest Evening
WE 1: ~12 years total
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2010, 10:10
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.
Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 143
Location: Manchester UK
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2010, 13:11
that was good explanation guys!!!

OA is E
Current Student
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Posts: 851
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: Fisher '19 (M\$)
GPA: 3.71
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2015, 00:31
firasath wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?
(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.

This supports fact 1. It doesn't do anything for fact 2.

(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.

If the total time is decreasing, then the chances of brand name commercials being in the middle is less. Does not support.

(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.

Out of scope. Doesn't explain/support how brand names are not being recalled with their position in the cluster.

(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.

if there are more clusters, then theres more chances for viewers to catch the first or last commercial in the cluster which could be brand names. Does not support

(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

if the number of commercials in a cluster is increasing, then the chances for brand names to be in the middle is greater. This supports fact 2. Pick E

I think your explanation makes sense
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2016
Posts: 37
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q47 V21
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2016, 17:17
1
2
sagarsabnis wrote:
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?
(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

IMO:- E

Between D & E

Suppose In 1 hr movie, there are 4 ad breaks and each ad break there are 12 Nos ad. Therefore Total ads/movie aired are 4X12=48 Nos. Out of those 48 Nos, as per argument people would remember 2 ads/ breaks i.e. 2X4=8 Nos.

Now choice D says : Clusters /Ad breaks get increased. So ad breaks increased to 6 Nos. Now people would remember 2X6=12 Nos which is more than original 8 Nos. This is going against the argument.

Choice E :-Ads get increased.So now per ad break there are now 16 ads/break and 3 ad breaks.People would remember 2X3=6 Nos ads in this scenario which is going with the flow of argument which says that advertising is becoming less effective (Fact1)- Correct

_________________

Consider giving Kudos, if you find worth it !!

Director
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 678
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2016, 02:45
(D)The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing
Clusters of consecutive commercials could be small or big i.e. there could be 2 ads or 10 ads. We do not know that.
Also if the cluster of ads is increasing then there can be two scenarios:
1st: when the same ads are being repeated.
If this is the case, then it would reinforce the brand names because you will be watching the same brands again and again.

2nd: When ads are different everytime. It would become difficult to recall except what is seen first and last.

(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing
If the number of ads increase in a cluster then it becomes hard to recall the clutter of brands. Thus it supports fact 1.
_________________

Help me make my explanation better by providing a logical feedback.

If you liked the post, HIT KUDOS !!

Don't quit.............Do it.

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 731
Location: United States
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GRE 1: Q157 V158
GPA: 2.66
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2017, 17:04
sagarsabnis wrote:
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?

(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

Spoiler: :: OE
Because E indicates that the number of commercials in a cluster is increasing, it entails that proportionally more
commercials are aired in intermediate positions. Hence, E helps fact 2 explain fact 1 by showing that
increasingly more commercials are aired in positions in which viewers find them difficult to recall. E is the best
answer. A testifies to the ineffectiveness of television advertising but does not help fact 2 explain fact 1. B
indicates that fact 2 contradicts rather than explains fact 1, since it suggests that the number of commercials per
cluster is decreasing. C and D help to explain fact 1-by describing a change in viewing habits and a change in
programming-but neither relates fact 2 to fact 1.

What E is clearly showing that because most people recall less during ads that appear in the middle, and because there are more of these clusters most will forget most of they saw and will probably only tend to remember brands advertised in the first and last ad of a cluster.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 345
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2017, 00:00
Fact 1
TA ==> less effective
less recall no of brands
Fact 2
first and last I remember, middle I forget.

(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
opposite effect.

(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.
if E is true, it can explain fact 1. more no. of consecutive commercial and more they forget.
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 27
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2018, 04:19
sagarsabnis wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 28
Page: 505

Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.

Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.

Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?

(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

Spoiler: :: OE
Because E indicates that the number of commercials in a cluster is increasing, it entails that proportionally more commercials are aired in intermediate positions. Hence, E helps fact 2 explain fact 1 by showing that increasingly more commercials are aired in positions in which viewers find them difficult to recall. E is the best answer.

A testifies to the ineffectiveness of television advertising but does not help fact 2 explain fact 1. B indicates that fact 2 contradicts rather than explains fact 1, since it suggests that the number of commercials per cluster is decreasing. C and D help to explain fact 1-by describing a change in viewing habits and a change in programming-but neither relates fact 2 to fact 1.

The clue to the answer lies in Fact 1- i.e. the proportion of $$\frac{# of Brand names viewer remember}{total brand advertised}$$ is decreasing

if # total brand advertised is increasing in a cluster ( as per fact1) then the denominator will increase. and this increase combined with Fact2 will validate the Fact 1.

So is the reason option D is wrong and option E is correct.
Intern
Joined: 09 Jan 2018
Posts: 16
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2018, 07:17
sagarsabnis wrote:
The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 10th Edition, 2003

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 28
Page: 505

Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.

Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.

Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?

(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

Spoiler: :: OE
Because E indicates that the number of commercials in a cluster is increasing, it entails that proportionally more commercials are aired in intermediate positions. Hence, E helps fact 2 explain fact 1 by showing that increasingly more commercials are aired in positions in which viewers find them difficult to recall. E is the best answer.

A testifies to the ineffectiveness of television advertising but does not help fact 2 explain fact 1. B indicates that fact 2 contradicts rather than explains fact 1, since it suggests that the number of commercials per cluster is decreasing. C and D help to explain fact 1-by describing a change in viewing habits and a change in programming-but neither relates fact 2 to fact 1.

This question is to explain Fact1 with Fact2. But it can't be completely explained. What is worse? Fact2 says that only the head and tail can be remembered, and fact1 says that the proportion of ads that are remembered has dropped.
OK, think about it, the head and tail can remember, the decrease in the ratio indicates that the total number has become larger, so the number of advertisements that should be untenable is increasing, that is, the number of advertisements in the middle is increasing. That is the answer E.
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 79
Location: India
Schools: Yale '19, GMBA '20, XLRI
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V35
GPA: 3.8
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2018, 10:30
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.

Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.

Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?

CATCH: an answer choice that contributes to the conclusion that promotion is less effective due to people not recalling advertisements in the middle of cluster.

(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
INCORRECT because if the viewer is recalling fewer than half, it still could be more than just the ones aired last or first.

(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
TRAP ANSWER. It is very possible that people do not recall because the time per advertisement has decreased. But we are not looking for a reason why "not recalling" happens.

(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
IRRELEVANT. We are concerned about viewership of commercials specifically.

(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.

(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.
CORRECT. If the number of ads per cluster are more and people can recall only the ones at beginning and end, then the proportion of commercials recalled becomes less. Thus less effective promotion.

KUDOS if this helps!
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 61
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V34
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2018, 11:18
AbhiGarg2007 wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?
(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

IMO:- E

Between D & E

Suppose In 1 hr movie, there are 4 ad breaks and each ad break there are 12 Nos ad. Therefore Total ads/movie aired are 4X12=48 Nos. Out of those 48 Nos, as per argument people would remember 2 ads/ breaks i.e. 2X4=8 Nos.

Now choice D says : Clusters /Ad breaks get increased. So ad breaks increased to 6 Nos. Now people would remember 2X6=12 Nos which is more than original 8 Nos. This is going against the argument.

Choice E :-Ads get increased.So now per ad break there are now 16 ads/break and 3 ad breaks.People would remember 2X3=6 Nos ads in this scenario which is going with the flow of argument which says that advertising is becoming less effective (Fact1)- Correct

Very intuitive way of expression!! You represented the way a mind thinks on paper. Kudos!!

The quant aspect to this question made it flawless
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2174
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2018, 20:16
AbhiGarg2007 wrote:
sagarsabnis wrote:
Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proportion of brand names promoted on television that viewers of the advertising can recall is slowly decreasing.
Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.
Fact 2 would be most likely to contribute to an explanation of fact 1 if which of the following were also true?
(A) The average television viewer currently recalls fewer than half the brand names promoted in commercials he or she saw.
(B) The total time allotted to the average cluster of consecutive television commercials is decreasing.
(C) The average number of hours per day that people spend watching television is decreasing.
(D) The average number of clusters of consecutive commercials per hour of television is increasing.
(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing.

IMO:- E

Between D & E

Suppose In 1 hr movie, there are 4 ad breaks and each ad break there are 12 Nos ad. Therefore Total ads/movie aired are 4X12=48 Nos. Out of those 48 Nos, as per argument people would remember 2 ads/ breaks i.e. 2X4=8 Nos.

Now choice D says : Clusters /Ad breaks get increased. So ad breaks increased to 6 Nos. Now people would remember 2X6=12 Nos which is more than original 8 Nos. This is going against the argument.

Choice E :-Ads get increased.So now per ad break there are now 16 ads/break and 3 ad breaks.People would remember 2X3=6 Nos ads in this scenario which is going with the flow of argument which says that advertising is becoming less effective (Fact1)- Correct

Option D---> fact 1 talks about the proportion of brand names that viewers of the advertising can recall. As per the above explanation, the proportion remains the same.
Original ratio = 8/48 = 1/6
New ratio =12/72 =1/6

So viewers recall the same proportion of brand names in case of D.

Fact 2: Television viewers recall commercials aired first or last in a cluster of consecutive commercials far better than they recall commercials aired somewhere in the middle.

If the total number of commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials= N
Then, the proportion of advertisements that a viewer can recall far better than normal = 2/N

(E) The average number of television commercials in a cluster of consecutive commercials is increasing-- this tells that our denominator N is increasing. Thus it helps explains fact 1.

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Re: Fact 1: Television advertising is becoming less effective: the proport &nbs [#permalink] 30 Dec 2018, 20:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by