It is currently 15 Dec 2017, 19:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# federal legislation

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2004, 21:38
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits <compensating state governments for damage to> their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.
(A) compensating state governments for damage to
(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging

Plz explain ur answer.

Thanks
Satya

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 184

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Location: Kiev, Ukraine

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 04:40
I believe there's nothing wrong with A.

Here's an explanation, I'm afraid it's a bit roundabout, but that's how I did it.

The correct parts of the sentences say this:

'Legislation... permits A, but does not allow B'

If we look at B closely, we can see 'injury to' people.

I figured, that by the same token, it should be 'damage to' resources.

Only A provides for that.
_________________

Searching for an answer...

Last edited by SmashingGrace on 14 Jun 2004, 05:52, edited 2 times in total.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: INDIA

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 05:23
mmmmm my ans wud be A too let me try wid the explantons!

federal legislation '' does'' some thing to do X but not to do Y fIf we can get the whole sent to this form ... it wud help us easyy on the right choice...

B) all is well but when the use of ''ing'' comes beware with the ETS policy
C) well... changes the meaning '' fed will give copensation b'cos sate gov. is damaging ....'' that wud tople the whole govt for that matter
D) IF i M WORNG THIS WUD BE THE ANS ... some how I feel permits and giving mean the same her in this context and juxtaposing them wud like saying U are a bad bad girl ''

E ) ''ing'' also ''the givng of'' is odd
hope that helpz ,

Have fun
_________________

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 06:55
I think "damage to" is the correct idiom here, so (B) and (D) are out.
(C) and (E) changes the meaning of sentence by using damaging, (Using damaging would mean, "federal legislation has damaged the resources.", which is not the intended meaning of the sentence.)

What's the OA.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 06:58
(A) looks fine.

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 08:46
A is my FA.

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 838

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 08:58
was definitely confused between A and D, but after looking at the posted explanations, I arrive at A !

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA
Re: federal legislation [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jun 2004, 09:19
singh_satya wrote:
Federal legislation establishing a fund for the cleanup of sites damaged by toxic chemicals permits <compensating state governments for damage to> their natural resources but does not allow claims for injury to people.
(A) compensating state governments for damage to
(B) compensating state governments for the damaging of
(C) giving state governments compensation for damaging
(D) giving compensation to state governments for the damage of
(E) the giving of compensation to state governments for damaging

Plz explain ur answer.

Thanks
Satya

A for me too
damage to is correct idiom
I think "giving compensation" is redundant; compensation is always given

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Re: federal legislation   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2004, 09:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# federal legislation

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.