Paraphrase:
Para 1:
It’s about “venture capital investment in technology sector”,
despite of drop in technology shares,
still investor’s want to invest, re-invest profits, and to start "new start-ups" by funding, which
can cause to increase technology sector valuation.
Para 2: Brief about invested returns till 2004, highest returns by “Software technology” from 2001 to 2003.
Para 3: After crash effects, overall, less new investment but more new re-investment by veteran.
Assumption: Many still invest reason to capture on ROI will be high on once’s exit.
Personal Learning "when market is down, invest, when market is Up, withdraw with good returns"
1. According to the passage, one of the reasons for the inflow of money into the said share market is:
A. After the revival of the share market,
investors opportunistically advanced their funds believing in the quick returns on money invested.
Wrong: this stem, gives information about revival and then investment.
B. The promising future of the software industry pushes investors to invest money.
Wrong: No, we need about investors & their returns, in technology shares,
this can be trap, as software industry is mentioned in passage,
which is an example of rise and fall journey of technology shares.
C. Keeping in view the massive returns of the pre-crash age,
the financiers fund their money.
Correct: as mentioned in paragraph 2,
the investment returns of investors in venture capital were very high from year 2001 to end of 2004 (i.e. pre-crash era).
Investors anticipating same returns, which motivated them to re-invest again.
D. To recover their funds lost during the market downfall,
the investor keenly invested their money in the share market.
Wrong: this is not the intention of investor, in fact many veteran reinvested, anticipating high investment returns.
E. Most veteran investors invest their vast available pension funds and endowments to gain from the market
Wrong: Again a trap! interesting its intended cause, why veteran invested is the answer of the question, that is option C
2. The author mentioned the word “recidivist” (Highlighted) most probably in order to
Recidivist meaning "convicted criminal who reoffends, especially repeatedly"
Interpretation: investors who have had done investment and have had good returns/rewards
they wanted to gain same again, repeating same investment again.
A. Explain when a market crashes, its aftershocks remain for several years - No
B. Stress that huge inflow of money in the market is not favourable - No
C. Show that managing as big funds as $2 billion is a massive responsibility - No
D. Identify that the investments by people in the boom period are inevitable - No
E. Highlight that people has started reinvesting their money in the market - Yes[/b]
3. The following can be [b]inferred from the passage
A. The investments by the venture capitalist were significantly greater than $20 billion in 2003
Wrong: we have information about “America's venture capitalists put $20.4 billion into deals in 2004.” Para 2, line 1
B. The investments by the venture capitalist during the bubble years were greater than $40 billion
Wrong: we have information about “Although this sum was far below the amounts of the bubble years, it marks the first increase after three years of declining investment.” Para 2 line 2
C. Money appraisals for American start-ups were less than 10m in 2001
Wrong: Information not mentioned in passage
D. Money appraisals for American start-ups were 10m in 2003
Correct: based on information para 2: last line
“Money appraisals for American start-ups in 2004 were $13m
—the highest since 2001 and a 30% increase compared with 2003” 30% drop of $13m of 2004 ~10m in 2003
E. After the crash of the market, the scarcity of good deals was
the prime reason for zero investments by venture-capital funds
Wrong: Well, it’s a Trap! If one misses the Option D logic, then Option E would have max acceptance as it is mentioned in passage para 4, 1st line, this stem mention’s “Prime reason” and “Zero” investment, it means involvement of all venture capital, as it cannot be 100%, if stem would have mentioned “Some venture capital funds” it would have dominated option D.
4. The author's main point is to highlight that:
A. Due to the complicated nature of the share market, the investors hesitate to risk their money
Wrong: as per paragraph 1, interpretation can be investors invested or some re-invested profit returns, it was only Peter Barris of New Enterprise Associates, who was hesitated of overvaluation by over flow of money invested, none mentioned about risk their money.
B. The sudden inject of excessive money in a recovering market is unfavourable
Correct:[/b] 1st, I didn’t go well with this option, but it has a logic in it, let say:
- 2001 – one invested $100 and share price in 2003 grew about 300% and 2004 dropped 150% i,e still 150% growth, now 2005 it went up by 100% , person who has invested $100 in 2005 its again 300% growth
- Now another one invested $300 in 2003 recovering market and share dropped 150%, its returns in 2004 is $150, & when 2005 shares rise by 100%, its still $300 i.e 0% growth,
its unfavourable for investor who invested in recovering market, this correctly defined in passage.
C. During the dwindling situation of the market, the huge influx of money, although favourable, is only possible after some years.
[b]Wrong: as example quoted above for OptionB, it can be or cannot be, as mentioned in passage, it the investors, who thought that market will respond as it did in 2001 to 2003, same now rise in share will happen, but, its only the instinct to have quick and good returns.
D. Venture-capitalists played a vital role to bring back the market to its normal
Wrong: easy elimination
E. Investors fund their money when they find good deals, without keeping in view the market situation
Wrong: easy elimination, irrelevant