Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:31 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:31
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
1,705
 [10]
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
 [10]
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
paddyboy
Joined: 06 May 2006
Last visit: 27 Nov 2016
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
79
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 387
Kudos: 79
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Own Kudos:
Posts: 894
Kudos: 639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
buzzgaurav
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Last visit: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Posts: 354
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
paddyboy
D.

a) may apply to the us only - what about the other parts of the world?
b) ROI is doubtful, as already mentioned
c) The Godfather way - 'make them an offer they can't refuse'. Doesn't make it attractive to investors.
d) provides an alternative approach.
e) The Osama way - absolute NO.

Brilliant observation, sadly GMAT doesn't test us on this :wink: .
User avatar
u2lover
Joined: 14 May 2006
Last visit: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
933
 [1]
Posts: 706
Kudos: 933
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
from what I understand... the argument is about raising money for the sport in the US and make people watch it on TV in the US...

thus A, has a little to do with the argument, as roofs might bring more people to the stadium, but not watch games on TV, since players slide on the grass because it is wet. The fact that roof is built does not mean that the grass will suddenly be dry... player will still slide and lose the ball

B goes against the argument

C may or may not be true

E is out of scope

D is the only choice that stands out, as it deals with all the premises mentioned in the argument.
User avatar
TestWriter
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Last visit: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 16
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is D. Paddyboy's explanation is very good.
a. mentions a cheaper way, but does it solve the problem? we do not have all the information to properly conclude this one is the best option.
b. the statement says that 'this is an unsure solution'. it is automatically false. again, should there be more concrete data, we could possibly pick this one.
c. besides being a Godfather approach, we do not know about the value of those offers. building new roofs might be cheaper and a better solution, for example.
d. says the proposal with new kind of grass is inefficient and explains why. then, deals with the problem from another angle. plus, this option answers 'and the other parts of the world' part of the question.
e. obviously there just to take your attention off the main issue.
User avatar
paddyboy
Joined: 06 May 2006
Last visit: 27 Nov 2016
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 387
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zoom612
Paddyboy, I have a question for you.
Option A talks about the popularity of football in U.S.But why should we not choose A as the argument just talks about U.S.


The question mentions - "Which of the following is a better suggestion, the one that will make the game more financially attractive to football clubs and investors in the U.S. and other parts of the world? "

Which is why I took it out without thinking too much about it. Testwriter's explanation about this is good :)
User avatar
saurabh9gupta
Joined: 10 Jan 2013
Last visit: 28 Jul 2023
Posts: 264
Own Kudos:
177
 [1]
Given Kudos: 201
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GRE 1: Q163 V155
GPA: 3.95
Products:
GRE 1: Q163 V155
Posts: 264
Kudos: 177
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Bunuel - plz add OA
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,406
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,406
Kudos: 778,408
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
saurabh9gupta
Hey Bunuel - plz add OA
____________________
Done. Thank you.
User avatar
udaypratapsingh99
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 399
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 372
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Praetorian
Football is not a very popular sport in the U.S. To make more people like the game and watch it on TV (and therefore bringing in more money from commercial ads), the football association proposed several changes to make the game more active and attractive. One of the suggestions is to grow grass on the football fields that would be water resistant on the surface. This will make the game run smoother, as often times football players slide on wet grass and therefore lose the ball.

Which of the following is a better suggestion, the one that will make the game more financially attractive to football clubs and investors in the U.S. and other parts of the world?

a. Building stadiums with roofs that cover 100% of the stadium is considerably cheaper than using water resistant grass in U.S.

b. Football games should be advertised more on TV in order to attract such audiences that never watched football before. This is an unsure solution, as the ROI in this case is doubtful.

c. U.S. needs to attract more foreign players to make the games more attractive by offering them such benefits that they cannot refuse.

d. Research shows that planting water resistant grass is very ineffective as it increases the costs of running a stadium and would not enable football stadium owners make much profit off the sales of the tickets. Therefore, investors should invest more in the football players' shoes to make them run smooth on wet surfaces.

e. Football should cease to exist and more money needs to be channelled in other sports, like baseball and american football. More investments into popular sports will bring in more profit off the sports.

Strange - there's only one relatable option, option D, and all other options are wague, and yet a majority of people marking it wrong.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts