Jul 19 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease. Jul 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn a structured approach to solve 700+ Number Properties question in less than 2 minutes
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56251

Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 04:55
Question Stats:
29% (02:33) correct 71% (03:03) wrong based on 349 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of them buy a pillow case each too. The prices of the seven items were all different integers, and every top cost more than every pillow case. What was the price, in dollars, of the most expensive pillow case if the total price of the seven items was $89? (1) The most expensive top cost $16. (2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9. Kudos for a correct solution.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 221

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 10:39
HI Bunuel, My solution as follows, Option A for me. Please let me know whether this is correct. Really killer question. Our of curiosity can we solve this in 2 mins. A T1 PC1 B T2 PC2 C T3 PC3 D T4 T1+T2+T3+T4+PC1+PC2+PC3=89 (T>PC) Option A: Most expensive top costs 16 lets say, 16+15+14+13.; That means= PC1+PC2+PC3=31 (Lets assume PC1 as the expensive pillow case) From the given data, we must take the highest possible numbers for shirts because, the pillow cases are the least expensive ones. From the above, (16+15+14+13)= 58= Remaining 31 must be shared among the 3 pillow cases. the only we can do is 12+11+9; 12+10+9 and 12+11+8; In any of the above, the value maximum value will be for Pillow case =12. A Sufficient. Option B: The least expensive pillow case is $9, Following the above, we can fix the most expensive pillow case depending on the how we arrange the prices of the top. Option A. Bunuel wrote: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of them buy a pillow case each too. The prices of the seven items were all different integers, and every top cost more than every pillow case. What was the price, in dollars, of the most expensive pillow case if the total price of the seven items was $89?
(1) The most expensive top cost $16.
(2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9.
Kudos for a correct solution.
_________________
Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.




Intern
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 40
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38 GMAT 2: 760 Q48 V47

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 11:44
Bunuel wrote: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of them buy a pillow case each too. The prices of the seven items were all different integers, and every top cost more than every pillow case. What was the price, in dollars, of the most expensive pillow case if the total price of the seven items was $89?
(1) The most expensive top cost $16.
(2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9.
Kudos for a correct solution. Answer A The Only possible ways to price the pillows is $16, 15, 14, 13. Sum = 58. To account for 31 the only possible combination would be 12, 10, 9. Sum = 31 Statement B. Fixes the lower limit, but we can have more than one value for the most expensive pillow. These two choices could be 11 or 12.



Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2014
Posts: 294
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management

Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 12:19
(1) The most expensive top cost $16. Top prices = 16, 15, 14, 13 Pillow case prices = 12, 10, 9 No other higher pillow prices are possible as all numbers still have to sum to 89 sufficient
(2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9. Here, pillow prices can range based on an unfixed top price For example: Top prices could be 17, 16, 15, 14 pillow prices could be 12, 11, 4 or 13, 10, 4 insufficient
Answer : A



Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2015
Posts: 116

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 12:46
x1, x2, x3  pillows, y1, y2, y3, y4  tops, lets just say that x1 < x2 < x3 < y1 < y2 < y3 < y4. x1 + x2 + x3 + y1 + y2 + y3 + y4 = 89.
#1 y4 = 16, which means that y3 <= 15, y2 <= 14, y1 <= 13, if we summ all these inequalities we'll get y1 + y2 + y3 + y4 <= 58, which means that x1 + x2 + x3 >= 89  58 = 31 (1) We also have to keep in mind that x3 <= 12, x2 <= 11 and x1 <= 10 Now lets look at our question, wich asks us the value of x3. To check if we can answer the question explicitly we should check if we can change x3 and still make our inequalities work: lets do it 1: x3 = 12 (max possible), in this case y4 = 16, y3 = 15, y2 = 14, y1 = 13, x2 = 11, x1 = 9  that works and gives us perfect 89. 2: x3 = 11 (second max), we can't really add to values of y so we have to compensate with x: in this case x2 will be 10 at max, x1 will be 9 at max and the summ will be 11+10+9 = 30 which doesn't satisfy (1)  fail. Going lower aggravates the situation even further so 12 is the only possible value for x3 thus the answer to question is SUFFICIENT
#2 x1 = 9 that means x2 >= 10, x3 >=11, y1>=12, y2>=13, y3 >=14, y4 >=15 and so x1+x2+x3+y1+y2+y3+y4 >= 84. We also have to keep in mind that x1+x2+x3+y1+y2+y3+y4 <= 89 The situation like this implies that our variables aren't exactly fixated coz the gap between 84 and 89 is rather big, lets see if we can answer our question. To do that lets check these 2 equalities: for the first one lets take minimum possible values of x1x3 and y1y4: 1)x1 + x2 + x3 + y1+ y2 +y3+y4 = 84 (9+10+11+12+13+14+15) lets increase x3 by 1 2)x1+x2+(x3+1)+(y1+1)+(y2+1)+(y3+1)+(y4+1) = x1+x2+x3+y1+y2+y3+y4 +5 = 89. The fact that we got 89 and not above it means that even if we increase our value of x3 we can still get respective values of y1y4 that would let us get the 89 total price (9 10 12 13 14 15 16) So we got 2 different possible values for x3 thus #2 is INSUFFICIENT
Answer is A.



Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 21

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 13:53
Should be A
Given that, 4T + 3P = 89
1) From 1st statement we know that most expensive top= $16
so lets take other tops as = ,$13,$14,$15
so total money spend on tops = 13+14+15+16= $58
Money left for pillow covers= 8958=$31
Now lets divide 31 among 3 pillows keeping in mid that the max value of a pillow cover can be 12 only
so a combination can be = 9,10 &12
we cant have any other combination other than this one whose sum will be =31
and if we lower the price of one of the tops say from 13 to 12, the total cost of tops will be = 12 + 14 + 15 +16 =$57 So we will have $32 for Pillow covers.
Now it is impossible to distribute 32 among 3 when max value can be 11, as max value for this combination = 11 +10 +9= 30 only.
So price of most exp pillow cover = $12
hence statement 1 is sufficient
2) From 2nd statement we know that ,
Least exp Pillow cover = $9
so we can take pillow covers as = 9 +10 + 11 = $30
So we will have to distribute remaining $59 among 4 tops.
we can have 1 combination as = 12+14+16+17 =59
Now lets take pillow covers as = 9 + 10 +12 = $31
So we will have to distribute remaining $58 among 4 tops.
This can be achieved as = 13+14+15+16=58
So from 2, we are getting two answers for price of most expensive pillow cover. Thus Not sufficient
Hence answer should be A



Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2015
Posts: 55

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 14:26
St (1) The most expensive top cost $16. To maximize the vale of 1 PC we need to min the value of Tops, Max vale of top = 16; so since all 4 tops are of different prices and we need to min their value lets take the lowest distinct value of the remaining tops = 16+15+14+13+12+x+y = 89 where x and y could be anything that adds up to give 19 and are not of a concern. Max value of PC =12. Thus Suff (2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9. max value of PC could be anything NS Answer A



Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2012
Posts: 11

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Apr 2015, 23:59
Let x1+x2+x3+x4 be the top costs and x5+x6+x7 be the pillow case costs. Essentially, x1>x2>x3>x4>x5>x6>x7.=89 Let x1 be the most expensive top and x5 be the most expensive pillow case.
S1: The most expensive top cost $16. therefore x1+x2+x3+x4 = 16+15+14+13 (since all numbers are different integers). >then x5=12, x6 and x7. (x6 and x7 could be any combinations totalling to 19). To arrive at the most expensive pillowcase (and different integer values), we need to minimize the differences between each of the integer values starting with $16 (upper limit). Sufficient.
St2: The least expensive pillow case cost $9. Since we have a lower limit, the most expensive pillowcase can hold multiple values. Therefore insufficient.
Ans: A



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56251

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2015, 06:04
Bunuel wrote: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of them buy a pillow case each too. The prices of the seven items were all different integers, and every top cost more than every pillow case. What was the price, in dollars, of the most expensive pillow case if the total price of the seven items was $89?
(1) The most expensive top cost $16.
(2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9.
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTIONThe first problem here is figuring out the starting point. There must be many ways in which you can price the seven items such that the total cost is $89. So we need to establish a base case (which conforms to all the conditions given in the question stem) first and then we will tweak it around according to the additional information obtained from our statements. ‘Seven items for $89’ means the average price for each item is approximately $12. But 12 is not the exact average. 12*7 = 84 which means another $5 were spent. A sequence with an average of 12 and different integers is $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $15. But actually another $5 were spent so the prices could be any one of the following variations (and many others): $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $20 (Add $5 to the highest price) $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $16, $18 (Split $5 into two and add to the two highest prices) $9, $10, $12, $13, $14, $15, $16 (Split $5 into five parts of $1 each and add to the top 5 prices) $7, $9, $13, $14, $15, $16, $17 (Take away some dollars from the lower prices and add them to the higher prices along with the $5) etc Let’s focus on another piece of information given in the question stem: “every top cost more than every pillow case.” This means that when we arrange all the prices in the increasing order (as done above), the last four are the prices of the four tops and the first three are the prices of the three pillow cases. The most expensive pillow case is the third one. Now that we have accounted for all the information given in the question stem, let’s focus on the statements. Statement 1: The most expensive top cost $16. We have already seen a case above where the maximum price was $16. Is this the only case possible? Let’s look at our base case again: $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $15 (a further $5 needs to be added to bring the total price up to $89) Since the prices need to be all unique, if we add 1 to any one price, we also need to add at least $1 to each subsequent price. E.g. if we increase the price of the least expensive pillow case by $1 and make it $10, we will need to increase the price of every subsequent item by $1 too. But we have only $5 more to give. If the maximum price is $16, it means the rightmost price can increase by only $1. So all prices before it can also only increase by $1 only and except the first two prices, they must increase by $1 to adjust the extra $5. Hence the only possible case is $9, $10, $12, $13, $14, $15, $16. So the cost of the most expensive pillow case must have been $12. Statement 1 is sufficient alone. Statement 2: The least expensive pillow case cost $9. A restriction on the lowest price is much less restrictive. Starting from our base case $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $15, we can distribute the extra $5 in various ways. We can do what we did above in statement 1 i.e. give $1 to each of the 5 highest prices: $9, $10, $12, $13, $14, $15, $16 We can also give the entire $5 to the highest price: $9, $10, $11, $12, $13, $14, $20 So the price of the most expensive pillow case could take various values. Hence, statement 2 alone is not sufficient. Answer (A) Note that the answer is a little unexpected, isn’t it? If we were to read the question and guess within 20 secs, we would probably guess that the answer is (C), (D) or (E). The two statements give similar but complementary information. It would be hard to guess that one will be sufficient alone while other will not be. This is what makes this question interesting and hard too. Our strategy here was to establish a base case and tweak it according to the information given in the statements. This strategy is often useful in DS – not just in maxmin questions but others too.
_________________



BSchool Thread Master
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 75
Location: Singapore
WE: Operations (Investment Banking)

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Sep 2015, 22:07
Bunuel wrote: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of them buy a pillow case each too. The prices of the seven items were all different integers, and every top cost more than every pillow case. What was the price, in dollars, of the most expensive pillow case if the total price of the seven items was $89?
(1) The most expensive top cost $16.
(2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9.
Kudos for a correct solution. so just to confirm, if the question read "total price of the seven items was $90", then the OA should be E right?



Intern
Joined: 05 Feb 2015
Posts: 3

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 May 2017, 08:14
I will take (pillow case) p1=1,p2=3,p3=15 and (top) t1=16,t2=17,t3=18,t4=19 so the total is 89. This is the max (p3=15) of pillow cost without any statements.Why we need statements here as i got unique value ?



Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 472
Location: India
GPA: 3.5

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Sep 2017, 23:54
My approach
Statement 1: price of most expensive top is 16$, so the max value of most exp pillow should be 12$ (since there can be 4 tops with values 13,14,15,16).
Let us assume that price of most exp pillow is 11$, then let price of other pillow items be 10$ and 9$, so total price of pillows = (11 + 10 + 9) = 30$, now given, most exp top is 16$, so max combined price of other three tops will be (13+14+15) = 42,
So max combined price of 7 items (30 $  pillows) + (42  top) + 16 (most exp top) = 88 which is not equals to 89. Our assumption of price of most exp pillow = 11$, is wrong. so price of most exp pillow cannot be 11 $ or less than 11$. Also, since most exp price of pillow also cannot be >12$. The price of most exp pillow has to be 12$.  Suff
Statement2: price of least expensive pillow is 9$
so min value of most exp pillow is 11$
let us assume price of most exp pillow is 11$, then possible values of 7 items (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20) = 89$ let us assume price of most exp pillow is 12$, then possible values of 7 items (9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) = 89$
from above, price of most exp pillow can be 11$ or 12$  Insuff
So Answer A.



Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2018
Posts: 217
Location: United States (ID)
GPA: 3.33
WE: Accounting (Accounting)

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jan 2018, 11:16
from st2: ones will find that 9, 10, 11, 12,13,14,15 so closed. the price can be either 11 or 12. from st1, the highest price is locked, so the answer must be 11



Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 224
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 4

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jan 2018, 11:37
cant we split $89 into 7 parts as 8,11,12,13,14,15,16?



Intern
Joined: 27 May 2015
Posts: 5

Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Aug 2018, 03:31
Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of them buy a pillow case each too. The prices of the seven items were all different integers, and every top cost more than every pillow case. What was the price, in dollars, of the most expensive pillow case if the total price of the seven items was $89? (1) The most expensive top cost $16. (2) The least expensive pillow case cost $9
Please correct me if I am wrong 
Let's put the prices in the asending order  {P1,P2,P3,T1,T2,T3,T4}, we have to find the max value of P3.So in the set, the rest all values should be minimum Statement 1:T4=16,so T1(min)=P3+1(as every top costs more than the pillow),T2(min)=P3+2,T3(min)=P3+3,P1=1,P2=2 >4P3+25=89 >P3=16, But it can not be 16 as T4 is 16, So P3(max)=12, Statement 1 alone is sufficient Statement 2:P1(min)=9,so P2(min)=10,T1(min)=P3+1,T2(min)=P3+2,T3(min)=P3+3,T4=P3+4 >5P3+29=89 >P3=12, Statement 2 alone is sufficient
So the answer should be D Please comment




Re: Four friends go to Macy’s for shopping and buy a top each. Three of th
[#permalink]
24 Aug 2018, 03:31






