It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 04:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
D
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 320

Kudos [?]: 237 [1], given: 97

Location: United States (MA)
Reviews Badge
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2017, 21:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

36% (01:21) correct 64% (01:44) wrong based on 116 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.

Source: LSAT
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

+1 Kudos is the best way to say "Thank you!"


Last edited by broall on 24 Sep 2017, 21:55, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question

Kudos [?]: 237 [1], given: 97

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 33

Reviews Badge
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 06:35
Option D. because the bio-markers, geologist is talking about, can be from the bacteria molecules within the earth crust.
_________________

NOW OR NEVER

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 33

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 682

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 138

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 19:19
david2099 wrote:
Option D. because the bio-markers, geologist is talking about, can be from the bacteria molecules within the earth crust.


Hi,

Could you please elaborate your answer? Bacteria are living creatures only. So, why did you choose D?

Regards
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
2. LSAT RC compilation
3. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
4. QOTD RC (Carcass)
5. Challange OG RC

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 138

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:14
broall can you explain this one ? :/

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

1 KUDOS received
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1290

Kudos [?]: 1089 [1], given: 62

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
Masshole wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?


(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.
_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Kudos [?]: 1089 [1], given: 62

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 682

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 138

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:43
broall wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.


Hi broall,
Thanks for the quick reply. I still have the following doubt:
As per the highlighted portion, we need to undermine the position that petroleum is formed from the fossils of living materials such as plants and animals.
Bacteria are also living creatures, then how does option D weaken the argument?

Please throw some light on this.
Regards
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
2. LSAT RC compilation
3. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
4. QOTD RC (Carcass)
5. Challange OG RC

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 138

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:58
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself.


Thank You for the prompt reply broall
but i have a question

How can you conclude that bacteria leads to the formation of biomakers, since nothing is mentioned in the argument ? plus bacteria are living organisms :/
can you explain this part ?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 36

Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1290

Kudos [?]: 1089 [0], given: 62

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 21:54
gmatexam439 wrote:
broall wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.


Hi broall,
Thanks for the quick reply. I still have the following doubt:
As per the highlighted portion, we need to undermine the position that petroleum is formed from the fossils of living materials such as plants and animals.
Bacteria are also living creatures, then how does option D weaken the argument?

Please throw some light on this.
Regards


You take the wrong argument. The argument is highlighted. Hope this helps!

kunalsinghNS wrote:
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself.


Thank You for the prompt reply broall
but i have a question

How can you conclude that bacteria leads to the formation of biomakers, since nothing is mentioned in the argument ? plus bacteria are living organisms :/
can you explain this part ?


The argument doesn't mention anything about bacteria, but this answer choice does. This choice provides some extra information that does weaken the argument.
_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

Kudos [?]: 1089 [0], given: 62

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 682

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 138

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2017, 07:11
Still not convinced with the answer. Bacteria are living organisms that definitely indicate the past/present of the living species.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
2. LSAT RC compilation
3. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
4. QOTD RC (Carcass)
5. Challange OG RC

Kudos [?]: 160 [0], given: 138

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2017, 07:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.