GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Jul 2018, 12:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
V
Joined: 30 Jan 2016
Posts: 624
Location: United States (MA)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Sep 2017, 21:55
2
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:24) correct 62% (01:50) wrong based on 211 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.

Source: LSAT

_________________

本当のライバルは昨日までの自分


Originally posted by Akela on 24 Sep 2017, 21:33.
Last edited by broall on 24 Sep 2017, 21:55, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jul 2015
Posts: 15
Reviews Badge
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 06:35
Option D. because the bio-markers, geologist is talking about, can be from the bacteria molecules within the earth crust.
_________________

NOW OR NEVER

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1052
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 19:19
david2099 wrote:
Option D. because the bio-markers, geologist is talking about, can be from the bacteria molecules within the earth crust.


Hi,

Could you please elaborate your answer? Bacteria are living creatures only. So, why did you choose D?

Regards
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


Preparing for RC my way


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 149
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:14
broall can you explain this one ? :/
1 KUDOS received
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1394
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:29
1
Masshole wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?


(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.
_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1052
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:43
broall wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.


Hi broall,
Thanks for the quick reply. I still have the following doubt:
As per the highlighted portion, we need to undermine the position that petroleum is formed from the fossils of living materials such as plants and animals.
Bacteria are also living creatures, then how does option D weaken the argument?

Please throw some light on this.
Regards
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


Preparing for RC my way


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Sep 2016
Posts: 149
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 20:58
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself.


Thank You for the prompt reply broall
but i have a question

How can you conclude that bacteria leads to the formation of biomakers, since nothing is mentioned in the argument ? plus bacteria are living organisms :/
can you explain this part ?
Senior CR Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1394
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 21:54
gmatexam439 wrote:
broall wrote:
Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized remains of plants and animals deep in the earth's crust has been challenged by scientists who hold that it formed, not from living material, but from deep carbon deposits dating from the formation of the earth. But their theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the geologist's argument?

(A) Fossils have been discovered that are devoid of biomarkers.
This choice is irrelevant to the argument

(B) Living organisms only emerged long after the earth's formation.
This choice strengthens the argument. This choice supports the argument that petroleum formed from the fossilized of living material.

(C) It would take many millions of years for organisms to become petroleum.
This choice strengthens the argument.

(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself

(E) Some carbon deposits were formed from the fossilized remains of plants.
This choice strengthens the argument since this choice indicates that the carbon deposits, which formed petroleum , were formed from the living materials.


Hi broall,
Thanks for the quick reply. I still have the following doubt:
As per the highlighted portion, we need to undermine the position that petroleum is formed from the fossils of living materials such as plants and animals.
Bacteria are also living creatures, then how does option D weaken the argument?

Please throw some light on this.
Regards


You take the wrong argument. The argument is highlighted. Hope this helps!

kunalsinghNS wrote:
Quote:
(D) Certain strains of bacteria thrive deep inside the earth's crust.
Correct. This choice points out a possible case that could undermine the argument: There are some certain strains of bacteria, which led to the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, thrive deep inside the Earth's crust. On the other hand, the presence in petroleum of biomarkers is from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself.


Thank You for the prompt reply broall
but i have a question

How can you conclude that bacteria leads to the formation of biomakers, since nothing is mentioned in the argument ? plus bacteria are living organisms :/
can you explain this part ?


The argument doesn't mention anything about bacteria, but this answer choice does. This choice provides some extra information that does weaken the argument.
_________________

Actual LSAT CR bank by Broall

How to solve quadratic equations - Factor quadratic equations
Factor table with sign: The useful tool to solve polynomial inequalities
Applying AM-GM inequality into finding extreme/absolute value

New Error Log with Timer

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1052
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
CAT Tests
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2017, 07:11
Still not convinced with the answer. Bacteria are living organisms that definitely indicate the past/present of the living species.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


Preparing for RC my way


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 534
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2018, 00:44
gmatexam439 wrote:
Still not convinced with the answer. Bacteria are living organisms that definitely indicate the past/present of the living species.


Geologist's Argument: Their (scientists') theory is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers, molecules indicating the past or present existence of a living organism.

Scientists' theory is refuted. So, what is scientists' theory? Scientists' theory is that petroleum is formed from deep carbon deposits. So if scientists' theory is refuted, it becomes that petroleum is NOT formed from deep carbon deposits. Why? because the presence of molecules, the biomarkers, in petroleum.

We need to weaken the argument. We can do this by showing that petroleum is formed from deep carbon deposits or by showing that the presence of molecules in petroleum does not necessarily lead that petroleum is NOT formed from deep carbon deposits.

Only option D weakens the argument by saying that the presence of biomarkers in petroleum may be from the external factors, not from the petroleum source itself (broall).
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Re: Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized &nbs [#permalink] 11 Jun 2018, 00:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Geologist: The dominant view that petroleum formed from the fossilized

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.