Bunuel
Pancreas releases enzymes that control the amount of sugar in blood. An endocrinologist observed that subjects with low-functioning pancreas usually have poorer cardiac health than do people with average to high levels of pancreatic function. Thus, the endocrinologist concluded that high pancreatic function is vital for maintaining blood sugar level as well as cardiac health.
The endocrinologist’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?
A) High pancreatic function ensures good cardiac health better than normal pancreatic function does.
B) Irregular blood sugar is similar to poor cardiac health in its physiological effects.
C) Those whose bodies maintain high pancreatic function cannot develop poor cardiac health.
D) Treating irregular blood sugar with insulin is not as effective as treating poor cardiac health with cardiac therapy.
E) Poor cardiac health does not result in a decrease in pancreatic function.
Experts' Global Official ExplanationMind-map: Pancreas controls blood sugar --> people with low functioning pancreas have poorer cardiac health than those with average or high functioning pancreas --> high pancreas function is vital for maintaining blood sugar levels and cardiac health (conclusion)
Missing-link: Between people with low functioning pancreas having poorer cardiac health than those with average or high functioning pancreas and the conclusion that high pancreas function is vital for maintaining blood sugar levels and cardiac health
Expectation from the correct answer choice: To strengthen the conclusion that high pancreas function is vital for maintaining blood sugar levels and cardiac health, through a valid assumption
Note: This question tests the classic GMAT concept of confusing “effect” with “cause”; the argument mentions that low functioning pancreas is associated with poorer cardiac health and concludes that high pancreas function leads to good cardiac health; the argument may have missed the possibility of “low functioning pancreas” the effect and “bad cardiac health” being the cause.
A. Trap. If high pancreatic function ensures good cardiac health better than normal pancreatic function does, it indicates the importance of high pancreatic function in maintaining good cardiac health, thus strengthening the conclusion. However, despite being a fine "strengthening statement", this answer choice doesn't qualify as a valid "assumption" because it doesn't have to be true for the conclusion to hold; it is possible that high pancreatic function is vital for cardiac health without high pancreatic function being better than normal pancreatic function in ensuring good cardiac health; please remember, a valid assumption “must be necessarily true” for the argument to hold. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
B. Trap. The argument is concerned with the importance of high pancreatic function in maintaining blood sugar levels and cardiac health; this answer choice, suggesting a similarity between irregular blood sugar and poor cardiac health, makes no suggestion regarding the importance of high pancreatic function; so, this answer choice is just additional information and does not strengthen the argument. Besides, this condition is not necessary for the argument to hold and thus, is not a valid assumption. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
C. Trap. This answer choice, suggesting that those with high pancreatic function cannot develop poor cardiac health, indicates the importance of high pancreatic function in maintaining good cardiac health, thus strengthening the conclusion. However, despite being a fine "strengthening statement", this answer choice doesn't qualify as a valid "assumption" because it doesn't have to be true for the conclusion to hold; it is possible that high pancreatic function is vital for cardiac health without high pancreatic function ruling out the possibility of developing poor cardiac health; in other words, even if some of those with high pancreatic function sometimes develop poor cardiac health, high pancreatic function may still be vital for cardiac health; please remember, a valid assumption “must be necessarily true” for the argument to hold. Besides, please note, a hint here is in the term “cannot”, which is too strong to be a valid assumption; one needs to be cautious of such answer choices as they are generally incorrect on the GMAT. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
D. The argument is concerned with the importance of high pancreatic function in maintaining blood sugar levels and cardiac health; this answer choice, comparing the effectiveness of treatments of associated illnesses, is just additional information and has no bearing on the argument. Besides, this condition is not necessary for the argument to hold and thus, is not a valid assumption. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
E. Correct. By eliminating the possibility of poor cardiac health causing low pancreatic function, this answer choice indicates that, in people with low functioning pancreas and poor cardiac health, low pancreatic function is the likely cause of poor cardiac health, thus strengthening the conclusion that high pancreatic function is vital for maintaining cardiac health. Additionally, this statement does have to be true for the conclusion to hold; negating this statement would mean that “poor cardiac health will result in low pancreatic function”, thus casting doubt on the cause-effect relationship established in the conclusion and negating the conclusion. Because this answer choice strengthens the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is correct.
E is the best choice.