C is a potential conclusion from the statements: If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are
more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly
make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.
The statements show how young people seem to not be reliable in terms of making informed decisions, hence likely to be swayed by biased media outlets for voting.
The option C, directly addresses this and tells us that if the young people want to make informed voting decisions, they need to
differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of informationBunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.
Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?
A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.