Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:00 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,160
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,160
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,160
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,160
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
MaxFabianKirchner
Joined: 02 Jun 2025
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
62
 [2]
Given Kudos: 122
Status:26' Applicant
Location: Denmark
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 4.0
WE:Other (Student)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arkadutt
Joined: 25 Sep 2022
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 53
Status:Live in the future and build what seems interesting.
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 8.26
WE:Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.

This is the correct option, because:

1. Many young people are media illiterate.

2. Biased media will influence elections.

Therefore, if young people are to vote in an informed way, many of them will need to improve their media literacy.
User avatar
Karanjotsingh
Joined: 18 Feb 2024
Last visit: 03 Oct 2025
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 362
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 139
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer
(C) If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.

Explanation

The Argument's Logic:
  1. Young people are bad at telling reliable information from unreliable information.
  2. Politicians will use unreliable (biased) information to influence elections.

Why (C) is the Correct Conclusion:

This choice directly connects the two points from the argument. If young people are going to make informed voting decisions (i.e., not be fooled by the biased information politicians use), they logically must acquire the skill they are currently lacking: the ability to tell reliable sources from unreliable ones. It's a direct and necessary consequence of the statements provided.

Why the Other Choices are Incorrect:
  • (A) and (B): These are specific recommendations ("should suggest courses," "should be required"). The passage describes a problem but doesn't provide enough information to conclude that these specific solutions are the right ones.
  • (D): This is too narrow. The problem is about all "sources of information," not just "journalism."
  • (E): This introduces a new idea ("unrealistic ideals") that is never mentioned in the passage.
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The stimulus says:

1) People are getting worse at telling reliable from unreliable info.

2) Young adults just out of school are worse than somewhat older adults at this.

3) Political actors are increasingly using biased media to sway elections.

We are looking for a conclusion that can be properly drawn from this information — that is, something that logically follows from what's stated.

Evaluating the options:
A. "It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses..."
-> This is a recommendation, not a conclusion drawn from the facts. The passage gives no basis for concluding what should be done, only what is happening.

B. "Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity..."
-> Again, this is a policy proposal, not a conclusion from the given facts.

C. "If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate..."
->This follows logically. Since many young people are media illiterate (per the passage), and informed voting requires media literacy, many of them must learn to be able to make informed decisions. This is a conditional conclusion based on the facts given.

D. "If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists..."
->This makes an assumption about the solution (that understanding journalism is the key), which is not directly supported by the passage. The stimulus talks about media literacy, not specifically journalism.

E. "When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse..."
->This introduces a new idea (confusing accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals), not mentioned or implied in the passage.

Final Answer: C
User avatar
Dipan0506
Joined: 24 May 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 72
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The paragraph states that media illiteracy tends to be higher in young adults (those who are in twenties) than the older adults. This is because older adults have practical exposure after completing their formal education, on the basis of that exposure and formal education they have the ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.

Point B should be the answer as it states this should be included in formal education so that they have the ability to differentiate while they step out for practical exposure. All other points tend to be optional from either the students side or administration, however this should be mandatory included in formal education. Hence point B.
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,282
Own Kudos:
784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Products:
Posts: 1,282
Kudos: 784
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

We are looking for something which connects unreliable sources, young adults and political actors.

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information. The passage is about reliable and unreliable source and not interpreting information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private. This is out of scope again. Educational curriculum covers general population, not just the young adults. Even if we consider the formal education part from the passage above, it does not follow as conclusion. No info on private and public too
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information. This makes sense
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism. This is out of scope, the discussion isn't focused on journalists
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals. This is mixed up. Nowhere it is suggested that young people are researching political candidates
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
BeachStudy
Joined: 30 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Aug 2025
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
37
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 61
Kudos: 37
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C (most likely)

A- This is focused on all voters not young adults in early twenties with formal education
B- Too broad for just education curriculums public and private
C- Focuses on younger people and informed voting decisions based off information - likely answer.
D- only focused on journalism.
E - We dont discuss researching, but this could of been the answer.

I believe it is most likely C
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
vnandan2001
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 25
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Suggesting media literacy courses is an opinion, not a conclusion.
B. Recommending changes to the curriculum is also a suggestion.
C. If young people are to make informed decisions, many need to learn to tell good from bad sources — this directly follows from the info.
D. Mentions "propagandists" and "understanding journalism" — not in the original passage.
E. Talks about confusing reporting with ideals — not mentioned at all.

(C)
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
Heix
Joined: 21 Feb 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 361
Own Kudos:
153
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
GPA: 3.4
WE:Accounting (Finance)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
Posts: 361
Kudos: 153
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let me analyze the premises in this argument:
1. The public's ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources is getting worse.
2. Young adults in their early twenties are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults.
3. Political actors will increasingly use biased media outlets to sway elections.
I need to find a conclusion that logically follows from these premises without introducing new information or assumptions.
C) If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
This is the correct answer. The premises establish that young adults have poor media literacy (premise 2) and that political actors will use biased media to influence elections (premise 3).
It logically follows that for young people to make informed voting decisions, they would need to improve their ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources.
Let's check the other options:
A) This recommends a specific solution (media literacy courses) that goes beyond what the premises support.
B) This prescribes a specific curriculum requirement that isn't supported by the premises.
D) While related to the topic, this introduces "propagandists" and focuses only on journalism understanding, which is narrower than the general media literacy mentioned in the premises.
E) This introduces a specific claim about young people confusing accurate reporting with ideals, which isn't mentioned in the premises.
User avatar
simondahlfors
Joined: 24 Jun 2025
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Posts: 48
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Information given:
- Public is getting worse at telling reliable vs. unreliable information
- Young adults in their early 20s (newly out of formal education) are more likely to be media illiterate than older adults
- Political actors will increasingly use biased media to sway elections

Question:
- Which conclusion can be properly drawn? (What must be true?)

Solution:
- A: It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information
- This is a recommendation ('should'). The passage does not require this step, it's advice, not a logical conclusion
- Not supported

- B: Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private
- Again, this is policy advice. The passage says they're worse, but does not state what the education system must do
- Not supported

- C: If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information
- The reasoning follows: young people are more likely to be media illiterate, they want informed decisions, they must be able to tell reliable information from unreliable information
- Supported

- D: If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
- The passage says they need to tell reliable from unreliable. 'Understanding journalism' is an extra leap, too specific.
- Not supported

- E: When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.
- The passage never mentions why young people are media illiterate or that they specifically confuse reporting with ideals
- Not supported

Answer: C, If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
Benedictng
Joined: 21 Jan 2025
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 18
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

A. Passage says nothing about needing to remedy the situation or the method to doing it, rejected
B. same reasoning as A, rejected
C. This follows from the passage which links ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information to political actors increasingly making use of biased media outlets, so a conclusion linking the two follows from the passage which is what C is, accepted
D. The passage doe not point out journalism specifically
E. The passage does not mention unrealistic ideals or how biased media outlets get young people.
User avatar
Emkicheru
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
Posts: 119
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

The issue is on getting reliable information hence it should be addressed as in option B
User avatar
iamchinu97
Joined: 14 Dec 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Products:
Posts: 132
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information. => Suggestions derived can't be the conclusion derived from the argument so this is irrelevant
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private. =>The passage does not mention anything about educational curriculum so out of scope or irrelevant
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information. => Yes thats what author is trying to say. he is trying to link the differentiation to voting decision. so this is the Ans
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism. =>The passage doesn’t mention journalism or propagandists specifically
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.=> The passage says young people are more media illiterate, but doesn’t say how they misinterpret information

Ans is C
User avatar
Harika2024
Joined: 27 Jul 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 80
Kudos: 65
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
From given options,

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.

is considered best as its considers following :

Public including young adults struggles with source differentiation, young adults are more likely to be media illiterate and Political actors will exploit this with biased media to influence elections. If young adults are to make informed voting decisions, they must be able to overcome their media illiteracy, which means learning to differentiate sources. This option is a conditional statement that logically follows from the components of the argument without introducing new assumptions or prescribing actions.
User avatar
Rishika2805
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 31
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My Answer is C

C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.Here is the reason
  • The statements say young adults are more media illiterate (i.e., less able to differentiate sources).
  • To make informed voting decisions in this environment, given their current media illiteracy, it logically follows that young people must acquire the ability to differentiate sources. This statement directly connects the observed problem (media illiteracy among young adults) with a necessary condition for a desired outcome (informed voting decisions) in the context of political influence. This is a direct logical consequence.

Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,422
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,422
Kudos: 4,979
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
argument
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse, young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults.
conclusion : political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information. not relevant to argument
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private. this is not what the argument is about
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information. there is no solution provided to issue in hand discussed
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism. correct option
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals. irrelevant


OPTION D is correct
OPT
Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

avatar
DachauerDon
Joined: 19 Apr 2025
Last visit: 27 Aug 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools: LBS
Schools: LBS
Posts: 29
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is asking me to identify/infer a conclusion from a set of premises.

A: incorrect -> this might be a sensible plan but it doesn't follow logically from the passage
B: incorrect -> for the same reason as A
C: correct -> each element in this answer follows logically from each premise in the prompt. People are getting worse at x, particularly young people, politicians use this to influence young people's political decisions so if young people are to not be influenced in their political decisions, they should get better at x.
D: incorrect -> out of scope. Understanding of journalism does not necessarily equal ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources.
E: incorrect -> related to the passage by content domain but doesn't flow logically from it.

Answer: C)
User avatar
hakzarif
Joined: 31 May 2025
Last visit: 25 Oct 2025
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Products:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The passage states that young adults fresh out of education struggle more than older adults to tell reliable from unreliable sources, and biased media will increasingly influence elections. Option A and B suggest specific solutions not mentioned in the passage, so they can be eliminated. Option D focuses on understanding journalism specifically, which the passage doesn’t address, and option E introduces confusion between accurate reporting and ideals, which isn’t stated. Only option C logically follows: if young people are to make informed voting decisions, many must learn to distinguish reliable from unreliable information.

Therefore, C is the best-supported conclusion.

Bunuel
The public’s ability to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information is getting worse. Young adults in early twenties, just having completed their formal education, are more likely to be media illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, political actors will increasingly make use of biased media outlets to sway elections in their favor.

Which of the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the statements above?

A. It should be suggested that voters attend media literacy courses in order to acquire a minimal competency in interpreting public information.
B. Instruction in how to evaluate the veracity of an information source should be made a required part of the educational curriculum, both public and private.
C. If all young people are to make informed voting decisions, many of them must learn how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources of information.
D. If young people are not to be influenced by propagandists, they must increase their understanding of journalism.
E. When researching political candidates, young people tend to confuse reasonably accurate reporting with unrealistic ideals.


 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2025

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts